Willow genotype, but not drought treatment, affects foliar phenolic concentrations and leaf-beetle resistance

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-14

  Glynn, Carolyn ^a,d   Rönnberg Wästljung, Ann Christin ^b   Julkunen Tiitto, Riitta ^c   Weih, Martin ^b  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^d Swedish Council for Building Research   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Chrysomelidae; Coleoptera; F2 hybrid; Genotype by environment interactions; Insect bioassays; Insect resistance; Phratora vulgatissima; Preference performance; Resource allocation; Root shoot ratio; Salix dasydados; Salix viminalis; Trade off growth defense

Indexed keywords

DROUGHT; GENOTYPE; PEST RESISTANCE; PHENOLIC COMPOUND;

CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; PHRATORA; SALICACEAE; SALIX; SALIX DASYCLADOS; SALIX VIMINALIS;

EID: 7244240801     PISSN: 00138703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00199.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Björkman C, Höglund S, Eklund K & Larsson S (2000) Effects of leaf beetle damage on stem wood production in coppicing willow. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2: 131-139.
2. Björkman C & Larsson S (1999) Insects on drought-stressed trees: four feeding guilds in one experiment. Physiology and Genetics of Tree-Phytophage Interactions (ed. by F Lieutier, WJ Mattson & MR Wagner), pp. 323-335. IUFRO International Symposium, Gujan, France.
3. Chapin FS III (1991) Effects of multiple environmental stresses on nutrient availability and use. Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses (ed. by HA Mooney, WE Winner & EJ Pell), pp. 67-88. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
4. Craig TP, Price PW & Itami JK (1992) Facultative sex ratio shifts by a herbivorous insect in response to variation in host plant quality. Oecologia 92: 153-161.
5. Denno RF, Larsson S & Olmstead KL (1990) Role of enemy-free space and plant quality in host-plant selection by willow beetles. Ecology 71: 124-137.
6. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
7. Fritz RS, Hochwender CG, Lewkiewicz DA, Bothwell S & Orians CM (2001) Seedling herbivory by slugs in a willow hybrid system: developmental changes in damage, chemical defense, and plant performance. Oecologia 129: 87-97.
8. Gershenzon J (1994) The cost of plant chemical defense against herbivory: a biochemical perspective. Insect-Plant Interactions (ed. by EA Bernays), Vol. 5, pp. 105-173. CRC Press, FL.
9. Glynn C, Herms DA, Egawa M, Hansen M & Mattson WJ (2003) Effects of nutrient availability on biomass allocation as well as constitutive and rapid induced herbivore resistance in poplar. Oikos 101: 385-397.
10. Hallgren P, Ikonen A, Hjältén J & Roininen H (2003) Inheritance patterns of phenolics in F1, F2 and back-cross hybrids of willows: implications for herbivore responses to hybrid plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 1143-1158.
11. Hartley SE & Jones CG (1997) Plant chemistry and herbivory or why the world is green. Plant Ecology (ed. by MJ Crawley), 2nd edn, pp. 284-324. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
12. Heilmeier H, Erhard M & Schulze ED (1997) Biomass allocation and water use under arid conditions. Plant Resource Allocation (ed. by FA Bazzaz & J Grace), pp. 93-111. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
13. Herms DA & Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283-335.
14. Hirose T (1987) A vegetative plant growth model: adaptive significance of phenotypic plasticity in matter partitioning. Functional Ecology 1: 195-202.
15. Hjältén J & Hallgren P (2002) The resistance of hybrid willows to specialist and generalist herbivores and pathogens: the potential role of secondary chemistry and parent host plant status. Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects (ed. by MR Wagner, KM Clancy, F Lieutier & TD Paine), pp. 153-168. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
16. Hochwender CG, Fritz RS & Orians CM (2000) Using hybrid systems to explore the evolution of tolerance to damage. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 590-521.
17. Huberty AF & Denno RF (2004) Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects: a new synthesis. Ecology 85: 1383-1398.
18. Hunter T (1992) Pest and disease problems in willow biomass plantations. Proceedings of Wood Energy and the Environment (ed. by GE Richards), pp. 105-109. Harwell Laboratories, Oxford, UK.
19. Inbar M, Doostdar H & Mayer RT (2001) Suitability of stressed and vigorous plants to various insect herbivores. Oikos 94: 228-235.
20. Jones CG & Coleman JS (1991) Plant stress and insect herbivory: towards an integrated perspective. Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses (ed. by HA Mooney, WE Winner & EJ Pell), pp. 249-280. Academic Press, San Diego CA.
21. Julkunen-Tiitto R (1989) Phenolic constituents of Salix: a chemotaxonomic survey of further Finnish species. Phytochemistry 28: 2115-2125.
22. Julkunen-Tiitto R (1986) A chemotaxonomic survey of phenolics in leaves of northern Salicaceae species. Phytochemistry 25: 663-667.
23. Julkunen-Tiitto R & Sorsa S (2001) Testing the effects of drying methods on willow flavonoids, tannins and salicylates. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 779-789.
24. Kelly MT & Curry JP (1991a) The biology and population density of the willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima (L.) on Salix viminalis in reclaimed cutaway peat. Journal of Applied Entomology 11: 44-56.
25. Kelly MT & Curry JP (1991b) The influence of phenolic compounds on the suitability of three Salix species as hosts for the willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 61: 25-32.
26. Kendall DA, Hunter T, Arnold GM, Liggitt J, Morris T & Wiltshire CW (1996) Susceptibility of willow clones (Salix spp.) to herbivory by Phyllodecta vulgatissima (L.) and Galerucella lineola (Fab.) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Annals of Applied Biology 129: 379-390.
27. Kirsten WJ & Hesselius GU (1983) Rapid, automatic, high capacity Dumas determination of nitrogen. Microchemical Journal 28: 529-547.
28. Kolehmainen J, Roininen H, Julkunen-Tiitto R & Tahvanainen J (1994) Importance of phenolic glucosides in host selection of a shoot galling sawfly, Euura amerinae, on Salix pentandra. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20: 2455-2466.
29. Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E & Keinänen M (1998) Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis testing by means of meta-analysis. Oikos 83: 212-226.
30. Larcher W (1995) Physiological Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
31. Larsson S (1989) Stressful times for the plant stress-insect performance hypothesis. Oikos 56: 277-283.
32. Loomis WE (1932) Growth-differentiation balance vs. carbohydrate-nitrogen ratio. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Sciences 29: 240-245.
33. Lorio PL Jr (1986) Growth-differentiation balance: a basis for understanding southern pine beetle-tree interactions. Forest Ecology and Management 14: 259-273.
34. Lower SS & Orians CM (2002) Soil nutrients and water availability interact to influence willow growth and chemistry but not leaf beetle performance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107: 69-79.
35. Matsuki M & MacLean SF Jr (1994) Effects of different leaf traits on growth rates of insect herbivores on willows. Oecologia 100: 141-152.
36. Mattson WJ & Haack RA (1987) The role of drought stress in provoking outbreaks of phytophagous insects. Insect Outbreaks (ed. by P Barbosa & JC Schultze), pp. 365-407. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
37. Miles PW, Aspinall D & Correll AT (1982) The performance of two chewing insects on water-stressed food plants in relation to changes in their chemical composition. Australian Journal of Zoology 30: 347-355.
38. Myers JH (1988) Can a general hypothesis explain population cycles of forest Lepidopterans? Advances in Ecological Research 18: 179-242.
39. Nichols-Orians CM, Fritz RS & Clausen TP (1993) The genetic basis for variation in the concentration of phenolic glycosides in Salix sericea: clonal variation and sex-based differences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 21: 535-542.
40. Orians CM, Bolnick DI, Roche BM, Fritz RS & Floyd T (1999) Water availability alters the relative performance of Salix sericea, Salix eriocephala, and their F1 hybrids. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 54-522.
41. Orians CM & Fritz RS (1995) Secondary chemistry of hybrid and parental willows: phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala and their hybrids. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 1245-1253.
42. Orians CM, Griffiths ME, Roche BM & Fritz RS (2000) Phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala and their F1 hybrids: not all hybrids are created equal. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 28: 619-632.
43. Orians CM, Huang CH, Wild A, Dorfman KA, Zee P, Dao MTT & Fritz RS (1997) Willow hybridization differentially affects preference and performance of herbivorous beetles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 285-294.
44. Orians CM, Lower SS, Fritz RS & Roche BM (2003) The effects of plant genetic variation and soil nutrients on secondary chemistry and growth in shrubby willow, Salix sericea: patterns and constraints on the evolution of resistance traits. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 233-247.
45. Orians CM, Roche BM & Fritz RS (1996) The genetic basis for variation in the concentration of phenolic glycosides in Salix sericea: an analysis of heritability. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 719-724.
46. Perttu KL (1998) Environmental justification for short-rotation forestry in Sweden. Biomass and Energy 15: 1-6.
47. Pretszler RW & Price PW (1988) Host quality and sawfly populations: a new approach to life table analysis. Ecology 69: 2012-2020.
48. Price PW (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62: 244-251.
49. Price PW (1997) Insect Ecology, 3rd edn. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
50. Price PW, Waring GL, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Tahvanainen J, Mooney HA & Craig TP (1989) Carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis in within-species phytochemical variation of Salix lasiolepis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 1117-1131.
51. Rank NE (1992) Host plant preference based on salicylate chemistry in a willow leaf beetle (Chrysomela aeneicollis). Oecologia 90: 5-101.
52. Roininen H & Tahvanainen J (1989) Host selection and larval performance of two willow-feeding sawflies. Ecology 70: 129-136.
53. Rowell-Rahier M (1984) The presence or absence of phenolglycosides in Salix (Salicaceae) leaves and the level of dietary specialization of some of their herbivorous insects. Oecologia 62: 26-30.
54. Soetens P, Rowell-Rahier M & Pasteels JM (1991) Influence of phenolglucosides and thrichome density on the distribution of insect herbivores on willows. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 59: 175-187.
55. Stamp N (2003) Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. The Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 23-55.
56. Sumerford DV, Abrahamson WG & Weis AE (2000) The effects of drought on the Solidago altissima-Eurosta solidaginis-natural enemy complex: population dynamics, local extirpations, and measures of selection intensity on gall size. Oecologia 122: 240-248.
57. Tahvanainen J, Julkunen-Tiitto R & Kettunen J (1985) Phenolic glycosides govern the food selection pattern of willow feeding leaf beetles. Oecologia 67: 52-56.
58. Tsarouhas B, Gullberg U & Lagercrantz U (2002) An AFLP and RFLP linkage map and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of growth traits in Salix. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 277-288.
59. Verwijst T (2001) Willows: an underestimated resource for environment and society. Forestry Chronicle 77: 281-285.
60. Waring GL & Cobb NS (1992) The impact of plant stress on herbivore population dynamics. Insect-Plant Interactions (ed. by EA Bernays), Vol. 4, pp. 168-215. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
61. Waring GL & Price PW (1988) Consequences of host plant chemical and physical variability to an associated herbivore. Ecological Research 3: 205-216.
62. Watt AD (1994) The relevance of the stress hypothesis to insects feeding on tree foliage. Individuals, Populations and Patterns in Ecology (ed. by SR Leather, AD Watt, NJ Mills & KFA Walters), pp. 73-85. Intercept, Andover, UK.
63. Weih M (2001) Evidence for increased sensitivity to nutrient and water stress in a fast-growing hybrid willow compared with a natural willow clone. Tree Physiology 21: 1141-1148.
64. Weih M & Nordh NE (2002) Characterizing willows for biomass and phytoremediation: growth, nitrogen and water use of 14 willow clones under different irrigation and fertilization regimes. Biomass and Bioenergy 23: 397-413.
65. White TCR (1974) A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars, with special reference to populations of Selidosema suavis in a plantation of Pinus radiata. New Zealand. Oecologia 22: 119-134.
66. White TCR (1984) The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63: 90-105.