DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations

Investigative Genetics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Ge, Jianye ^a   Budowle, Bruce ^a   Chakraborty, Ranajit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FAMILY; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MASS DISASTER; MUTATION; PEDIGREE; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RELATIVE; SAMPLE; STANDARD; Y CHROMOSOME;

EID: 78650728344     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20412223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-2223-1-8     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Li CC, Sacks L. The derivation of joint distribution and correlation between relatives by the use of stochastic matrices. Biometrics 1954, 10:347-360.
2. Jacquard A. The Genetic Structure of Populations 1974, New York: Springer.
3. Thompson EA. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet 1975, 39:173-188. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00120.x, 1052764.
4. Brenner C, Weir BS. Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor Pop Biol 2003, 63:173-178.
5. Cash HD, Hoyle JW, Sutton AJ. Development under extreme conditions: forensic bioinformatics in the wake of the World Trade Center disaster. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003, 638-53.
6. LeClair B, Niezgoda S, Carmody GR, Shaler RC. Kinship analysis and human identification in mass disasters: The use of MDKAP for the World Trade Center tragedy. 13th International Symposium on Human Identification 2002,
7. Leclair B, Fregean CJ, Bowen KL, Fourney RM. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: The Swissair flight 111 disaster. J Forensic Sci 2004, 49:939-953.
8. Lau G, Tan WF, Tan PH. After the Indian Ocean Tsunami: Singapore's contribution to the International Disaster Victim Identification effort in Thailand. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005, 34:341-351.
9. Buckleton J, Triggs C, Clayton T. Disaster victim identification, identification of missing persons, and immigration cases. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation 2005, 395-437. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Buckleton J, Triggs CM, Walsh SJ.
10. Drabek J. Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2009, 3:112-118. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.11.005, 19215880.
11. Dawid AP, Mortera J, Vicard P. Objected-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems. Forensic Sci Int 2007, 169:195-205. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.028, 17055679.
12. Brenner CH. Symbolic kinship program. Genetics 1997, 145:535-542. 1207816, 9071605.
13. Brenner CH. DNAView manual, version 27.49.
14. Hepler AB, Weir BS. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2008, 2:166-175. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.12.003, 2600569, 19079769.
15. Egeland T, Mostad PF, Mevag B, Stenersen M. Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases: selecting the most probable pedigree. Forensic Sci Int 2000, 110:47-59. 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00147-X, 10802200.
16. Ellegren H. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet 2000, 16:551-558. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02139-9, 11102705.
17. Schlotterer C. Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma 2000, 109:365-371. 10.1007/s004120000089, 11072791.
18. Elston RC, Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 1971, 21:523-542. 10.1159/000152448, 5149961.
19. National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science An Update: the Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence 1996, Washington (DC): National Academy Press, National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science.
20. Ge J, Wang T, Birdwell JD, Chakraborty R. Further remarks on: 'Paternity analysis in special fatherless cases without direct testing of alleged father' [FSI 146 S (2004) S159-S161] and remarks on it [FSI 163 (2006) 158-160]. Forensic Sci Int 2007, 172:e6-8. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.07.008, 17714899.
21. Balding DJ, Nichols RA. DNA profile match probability calculation - How to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci Int 1994, 64:125-140. 10.1016/0379-0738(94)90222-4, 8175083.
22. Evett IW, Weir BS. Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists 1998, 140-141. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
23. Chakraborty R, Stivers DN, Zhong Y. Estimation of mutation rates from parentage exclusion data: applications to STR and VNTR loci. Mut Res 1996, 354:41-48.
24. DiRienzo A, Peterson AC, Garza JC, Valdes AM, Slatkin M, Freimer NB. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:3166-3170. 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166, 43536, 8159720.
25. Estoup A, Jarne P, Cornuet JM. Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetic analysis. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:1591-1604. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01576.x, 12207711.
26. Kimura M, Crow JF. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 1964, 49:725-738. 1210609, 14156929.
27. Kimura M, Ohta T. Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978, 75:2868-2872. 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2868, 392666, 275857.
28. Crow JF, Kimura M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory 1970, 591. New York: Harper, Row.
29. AABB Annual report summary for testing in 2006. AABB., http://www.aabb.org/sa/facilities/Documents/rtannrpt06.pdf
30. Brinkmann B, Klintschar M, Neuhuber F, Hühne J, Rolf B. Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 62:1408-1415. 10.1086/301869, 1377148, 9585597.
31. Walsh B, Redd A, Hammer M. Joint match probabilities for Y chromosomal and autosomal markers. Forensic Sci Int 2008, 174:234-238. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.014, 17449208.
32. Budowle B, Ge J, Aranda X, Planz J, Eisenberg A, Chakraborty R. Texas population substructure and its impact on estimating the rarity of Y STR haplotypes from DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2009, 54:1016-1021. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01105.x, 19627418.
33. Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM) Guidelines for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) nucleotide sequence interpretation. Forensic Sci Comm 2003, 5. Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM).
34. Ruitberg CM, Reeder DJ, Butler JM. STRBase: a short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29:320-322. 10.1093/nar/29.1.320, 29767, 11125125.
35. Dawid AP, Mortera J, Pascali VL. Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int 2001, 124:55-61. 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00564-3, 11741761.
36. Egeland T, Mostad PF. Statistical genetics and genetical statistics: a forensic perspective. Scand J Stat 2002, 29:297-307.
37. Ge J, Budowle B, Aranda XG, Planz JV, Eisenberg AJ, Chakraborty R. Mutation rates at Y chromosome short tandem repeats in Texas populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2009, 3:179-184. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.01.007, 19414166.
38. Budowle B, Monson KL, Chakraborty R. Estimating minimum allele frequencies for DNA profile frequency estimates for PCR-based loci. Int J Legal Med 1996, 108:173-6. 10.1007/BF01369786, 8652419.