Relative importance of farming practices and landscape context on the weed flora of sown grass strips

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 139, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 595-602

  Cordeau, Stéphane ^a   Reboud, Xavier ^a   Chauvel, Bruno ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Field margin; Linear semi natural habitat; Mosaic structure; Partial Canonical Correspondence Analysis; Spatial scale; Spontaneous flora

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; FARMING SYSTEM; FIELD MARGIN; GRASS; SOWING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; WEED;

EID: 78650720317     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amiaud B., Touzard B. The relationships between soil seed bank, aboveground vegetation and disturbances in old embanked marshlands of Western France. Flora 2004, 199:25-35.
2. Andersson T.N., Milberg P. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 1998, 46:30-38.
3. Bayer Important Crops of the World and their Weeds 1992, Leverkusen. A.G. Bayer (Ed.).
4. Boatman N.D. Factors Affecting the Herbaceous Flora of Hedgerows on Arable Farms and its Value as Wildlife Habitat. Hedgerow Management and Nature Conservation 1994, 33-46. Wye. T.A. Watt, G.P. Buckley (Eds.).
5. Boutin C., Jobin B. Intensity of agricultural practices and effects on adjacent habitats. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8:544-557.
6. Critchley C.N.R., Fowbert J.A., Sherwood A.J., Pywell R.F. Vegetation development of sown grass margins in arable fields under a countrywide agri-environment scheme. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 132:1-11.
7. Critchley C.N.R., Fowbert J.A., Sherwood A.J. The effects of annual cultivation on plant community composition of uncropped arable field boundary strips. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 113:196-205.
8. de Blois S., Domon G., Bouchard A. Factors affecting plant species distribution in hedgerows of southern Quebec. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 105:355-367.
9. de Cauwer B., Reheul D., D'Hooghe K., Nijs I., Milbau A. Evolution of the vegetation of mown field margins over their first 3 years. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 109:87-96.
10. de Cauwer B., Reheul D., Nijs I., Milbau A. Impact of field margin vegetation and herbage removal on ingrowing and anemochorous weeds. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2006, 71:761-773.
11. de Cauwer B., Reheul D., D'Hooghe K., Nijs I., Milbau A. Disturbance effects on early succession of field margins along the shaded and unshaded side of a tree lane. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112:78-86.
12. de Snoo G.R. Arable flora in sprayed und unsprayed crop edges. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1997, 66:223-230.
13. de Snoo G.R., van der Poll R.J. Effect of herbicide drift on adjacent boundary vegetation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 73:1-6.
14. Debaeke P., Barralis G., Marty J.R. Effets de 13 années de rotations culturales irriguées ou non sur la flore adventice d'un blé d'hiver en région Toulousaine. II. Analyse de la flore levée hivernale. C. R. Acad. Agric. Fr. 1990, 76:37-46.
15. Dessaint F., Chadoeuf R., Barralis G. Nine years' soil seed bank and weed vegetation relationships in an arable field without weed control. J. Appl. Ecol. 1997, 34:123-130.
16. Fried G., Norton L.R., Reboud X. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128:68-76.
17. Fried G., Petit S., Dessaint F., Reboud X. Arable weed decline in Northern France: crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:238-243.
18. Gabriel D., Roschewitz I., Tscharntke T., Thies C. Beta diversity at different spatial scales: plant communities in organic and conventional agriculture. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16:2011-2021.
19. Gabriel D., Thies C., Tscharntke T. Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 7:85-93.
20. Hald A.B. Impact of agricultural fields on vegetation of stream border ecotones in Denmark. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 89:127-135.
21. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4:1-9.
22. Hanf M. Les adventices d'Europe 1982, BASF.
23. Jauzein P. Flore des champs cultivés 1995, SOPRA-INRA.
24. Le Coeur D., Baudry J., Burel F. Field margins plant assemblages: variation partitioning between local and landscape factors. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1997, 37:57-71.
25. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology 1998, Elsevier.
26. Lososova Z., Chytry M., Cimalova S., Kropac Z., Otypkova Z., Pysek P., Tichy L. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. J. Veg. Sci. 2004, 15:415-422.
27. Marshall E.J.P., Arnold G.M. Factors affecting field weed and field margin flora on a farm in Essex, UK. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1995, 31:205-216.
28. Marshall E.J.P., Moonen A.C. Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 89:5-21.
29. Marshall E.J.P., Brown V.K., Boatman N.D., Lutman P.J.W., Squire G.R., Ward L.K. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res. 2003, 43:77-89.
30. Marshall E.J.P. Agricultural landscapes: field margin habitats and their interaction with crop production. J. Crop Improve. 2004, 12:365-404.
31. Marshall E.J.P. The impact of landscape structure and sown grass margin strips on weed assemblages in arable crops and their boundaries. Weed Res. 2009, 49:107-115.
32. Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.H., Wagner H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 1.17-2 2010.
33. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2009, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
34. Rahman A., James T.K., Grbavac N. Correlation between the soil seed bank and weed populations in maize fields. Weed Biol. Manage. 2006, 6:228-234.
35. Roschewitz I., Gabriel D., Tscharntke T., Thies C. The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42:873-882.
36. Schippers P., Joenje W. Modelling the effect of fertiliser, mowing, disturbance and width on the biodiversity of plant communities of field boundaries. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 93:351-365.
37. Stoate C., Baldi A., Beja P., Boatman N.D., Herzon I., van Doorn A., de Snoo G.R., Rakosy L., Ramwell C. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe-a review. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 91:22-46.
38. Sutcliffe O.L., Kay Q.O.N. Changes in the arable flora of central southern England since the 1960s. Biol. Conserv. 2000, 93:1-8.
39. ter Braak C.J.F. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 1986, 67:1167-1179.
40. Thomas S.R., Noordhuis R., Holland J.M., Goulson D. Botanical diversity of beetle banks effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 93:403-412.
41. Walker M., Dover J., Sparks T., Hinsley S. Hedges and green lanes: vegetation composition and structure. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006, 15:2595-2610.
42. Westbury D.B., Woodcock B.A., Harris S.J., Brown V.K., Potts S.G. The effects of seed mix and management on the abundance of desirable and pernicious unsown species in arable buffer strip communities. Weed Res. 2008, 48:113-123.