Influence of fermentation by-products on the purification of ethanol from water using pervaporation

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1669-1674

  Chovau, S ^a   Gaykawad, S ^b   Straathof, A J J ^b   Van der Bruggen, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bio ethanol; Carboxylic acids; Fermentation; PDMS; Pervaporation

Indexed keywords

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; BUTANEDIOL; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; FERMENTATION BROTHS; FLUX AND SELECTIVITY; HYDROPHOBIC PERVAPORATION; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; PDMS; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; SEPARATION TECHNIQUES; SILICALITE; WATER FLUX;

BIOETHANOL; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; DISSOCIATION; EVAPORATION; FERMENTATION; GLYCEROL; HYDROPHOBICITY; MICROCHANNELS; PERVAPORATION; PURIFICATION; SORPTION; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

ETHANOL;

2,3 BUTANEDIOL; ALCOHOL; CARBOXYLIC ACID; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUGAR; WATER;

CARBOXYLIC ACID; EQUILIBRIUM; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PH; SALT; SEPARATION; SORPTION; SUGAR; WATER FLOW;

ARTICLE; FERMENTATION; FLUID BALANCE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE; PERVAPORATION; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURIFICATION; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE;

ACIDS; ADSORPTION; BIOFUELS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; PERMEABILITY; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

EID: 78650705738     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.092     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrahamse W., Steg L., Gifford R., Vlek C. Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: a question of self-interest or morality?. Transp. Res. F 2009, 12(4):317-324.
2. Aroujaliana A., Belkacemib K., Davids S.J., Turcotted G., Pouliot Y. Effect of residual sugars in fermentation broth on pervaporation flux and selectivity for ethanol. Desalination 2006, 193:103-108.
3. Baker, R.W., 2004. Membrane Technology and Applications, second ed. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., pp. 39-44, 139-155.
4. Balat M., Balat H., Oz C. Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34:551-573.
5. Banat F.A., Al-Rub F.Abu, Simandl J. Experimental study of the salt effect in vapor/liquid equilibria using headspace gas chromatography. Chem. Eng. Technol. 1999, 22(9):761-765.
6. Bettens B., Degrève J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Transport of binary mixtures in pervaporation through a microporous silica membrane: shortcomings of Fickian models. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2007, 42(1):1-23.
7. Bothun G.D., Knutson B.L., Strobel H.J., Nokes S.E., Brignole E.A., Diaz S. Compressed solvents for the extraction of fermentation products within a hollow fiber membrane contactor. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2002, 25:119-134.
8. Bowen T.C., Meier R.G., Vane L.M. Stability of MFI zeolite-filled PDMS membranes during pervaporative ethanol recovery from aqueous mixtures containing acetic acid. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 298:117-125.
9. Carton A., Benito G.G., Rey J.A., de la Fuente M. Selection of adsorbents to be used in an ethanol fermentation process. Adsorption isotherms and kinetics. Bioresour. Technol. 1998, 66:75-78.
10. Chovau S., Dobrak A., Figoli A., Simone S., Galiano F., Drioli E., Sikdar S.K., Van der Bruggen B. Pervaporation performance of unfilled and filled PDMS membranes and novel SBS membranes for the removal of toluene from diluted aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 159(1-3):37-46.
11. Claes S., Vandezande P., Mullens S., Leysen R., De Sitter K., Andersson A., Maurer F.H.J., Van den Rul H., Peeters R., Van Bael M.K. High flux composite PTMSP-silica nanohybrid membranes for the pervaporation of ethanol/water mixtures. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 351:160-167.
12. Dotremont C., Van den Ende S., Vandommele H., Vandecasteele C. Concentration polarization and other boundary layer effects in the pervaporation of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Desalination 1994, 95:91-113.
13. Efe Ç., van der Wielen L.A.M., Straathof A.J.J. High silica zeolites as an alternative to weak base adsorbents in succinic acid, recovery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49(4):1837-1843.
14. Ezeji T.C., Qureshi N., Blaschek H.P. Acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) production from concentrated substrate: reduction in substrate inhibition by fed-batch technique and product inhibition by gas stripping. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 63:653-658.
15. Fadeev A.G., Kelley S.S., McMillan J.D., Selinskaya Ya.A., Khotimsky V.S., Volkov V.V. Effect of yeast fermentation by-products on poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] pervaporative performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 214:229-238.
16. García M., Sanz M.T., Beltran S. Separation by pervaporation of ethanol from aqueous solutions and effect of other components present in fermentation broths. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:1873-1882.
17. Govindaswamy S., Vane L.M. Kinetics of growth and ethanol production on different carbon substrates using genetically engineered xylose-fermenting yeast. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:677-685.
18. Groot W.J., Kraayenbrink M.R., van der Lans R.G.J.M., Luyben K.C.H.A.M. Ethanol production in an integrated fermentation/membrane system. Process simulations and economics. Bioproc. Eng. 1993, 8:189.
19. Ikegami T., Kitamoto D., Negishi H., Haraya K., Matsuda H., Nitanai Y., Koura N., Sano T., Yanagishita H. Drastic improvement of bioethanol recovery using a pervaporation separation technique employing a silicone rubber-coated silicalite membrane. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2003, 78:1006-1010.
20. Kaseno Miyazawa I., Kokuga T. Effect of product removal by a pervaporation on ethanol fermentation. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998, 86(5):488-493.
21. Kim S., Dale B.E. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:361-375.
22. Lin Y., Tanaka S. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 69(6):627-642.
23. Lipnizki F., Hausmanns S., Field R.W. Influence of impermeable components on the permeation of aqueous 1-propanol mixtures in hydrophobic pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 228:129-138.
24. Lokhorst A., Wildenborg I. Introduction on CO2 Geological storage. Classification of storage options. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. IFP 2005, 60(3):513-515.
25. Lombardi L. Life cycle assessment comparison of technical solutions for CO2 emissions reduction in power generation. Energy Convers. Manage. 2003, 44:93-108.
26. Luis P., Garea A., Irabien A. Zero solvent emission process for sulfur dioxide recovery using a membrane contactor and ionic liquids. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330(1-2):80-89.
27. Madson P.W., Lococo D.B. Recovery of volatile products from dilute high-fouling process streams. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86:1049-1061.
28. Maiorella B.L. Ethanol industrial chemicals. Biochem. Fuels 1983, 861-914.
29. Nomura M., Bin T., Nakao S.-I. Selective ethanol extraction from fermentation broth using a silicalite membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 27:59-66.
30. O'Brien D.J., Roth L.H., McAloon A.J. Ethanol production by continuous fermentation-pervaporation: a preliminary economic analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 166:105-111.
31. Stichnothe H., Azapagic A. Bioethanol from waste: life cycle estimation of the greenhouse gas saving potential. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2009, 53:624-630.
32. Vane L.M. A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80:603-629.
33. Vane L.M. Separation technologies for the recovery and dehydration of alcohols from fermentation broths. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 2008, 2:553-588.
34. Vankelecom, I.F.J., Jacobs, P.A., Uytterhoeven, J.B., 1996. Method for preparing membranes, said membranes, separation methods using said membranes and the use of said membranes as catalytic membranes. European Patent, EP 96201340.5-2113.