The dual-role method and ultimatum game performance

Field Methods

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 102-114

  Macfarlan, Shane J ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominica; dual role method; ultimatum game

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650690858     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X10383546     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alvard, M.S. 2004. Introduction. Socioeconomic aspects of human behavioral ecology. Special issue, Research in Economic Anthropology 23:1-15.
2. Anderson, C.A., J.J. Lindsay, and B.J. Bushman. 1999. Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8:3-9.
3. Baron, J. 2001. Purpose and methods. Commentary on R. Hertwig and A. Ortmann. Behavioral and Brain Science 24:403.
4. Bax, L., L.M. Yu, N. Ikeda, N. Tsuruta, and K.G.M. Moons. 2006. Development and validation of MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data. BMC Medical Research Methodology 6:50.
5. Brandts, J., and G. Charness. 2000. Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preferences stability in experimental economic games. Experimental Economics 2:227-38.
6. Burks, S.T., J.P. Carpenter, and E. Verhoogen. 2003. Playing both roles in the trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51:195-216.
7. Camerer, C.F., and E. Fehr. 2004. Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies, eds. J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and H. Gintis, 55-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Carter, J.R., and M.D. Irons. 1991. Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:171-77.
9. Chen, K., and F. Tang. 2009. Cultural differences between Tibetans and ethnic Han Chinese in ultimatum bargaining experiments. European Journal of Political Economy 25:78-84.
10. Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S.G. West, and L.S. Aiken. 2003. Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral and social science. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Colman, A.M. 1982. Experimental games. In Cooperation and competition: In humans and animals, ed. A. Colman, 113-40. Berkshire, UK: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
12. Colman, A.M. 1995. Game theory and its applications. 2nd ed. London: Butter-worth-Heinemann.
13. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 2001. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39:17-88.
14. Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A-G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical science. Behavior Research Methods 39:175-91.
15. Flinn, M.V., and B.G. England. 1997. Social economics of childhood glucocorticoid stress response and health. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 102:33-53.
16. Gil-White, F.J. 2001. A good experiment of choice behavior is a good caricature of a real situation. Commentary on R. Hertwig and A. Ortmann. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:409-10.
17. Gurven, M., and J. Winking. 2008. Collective action in action: Prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist 110:179-90.
18. Guth, W., R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3:367-88.
19. Guth, W., and R. Tietz. 1990. Ultimatum bargaining behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 11:417-49.
20. Henrich, J. 2000. Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga. American Economic Review 90:973-79.
21. Henrich, J. 2001. Challenges for everyone: Real people, deception, one-shot games, social learning, and computers. Commentary on R. Hertwig and A. Ortmann. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:414-15.
22. Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, and H. Gintis, eds. 2004. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C.F. Camerer, E. Fehr, H. Gintis, and R. McElreath. 2004. Overview and synthesis. In Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies, eds. J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and H. Gintis, 8-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Hertwig, R., and A. Ortmann. 2001. Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:383-451.
25. Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, and V. Smith. 1996. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. International Journal of Game Theory 25:289-301.
26. Kagel, J.H., and A.E. Roth. 1995. The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Kuznar, L.A. 2001. Risk sensitivity and value among Andean pastoralists: Measures, models and empirical tests. Current Anthropology 42:432-40.
28. Kuznar, L.A. 2002. Evolutionary applications of risk sensitivity models to socially stratified species: Comparison of sigmoid, concave, and linear functions. Evolution and Human Behavior 34:265-80.
29. Kuznar, L.A., and J.M. Lutz. 2007. Risk sensitivity and terrorism. Political Studies 55:341-61.
30. Lipsey, M.W., and D.B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis, vol. 49. Applied Social Science Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31. Macfarlan, S.J., and R.Q. Quinlan. 2008. Kinship, family, and gender effects in the ultimatum game. Human Nature 19:294-309.
32. Marlowe, F.W. 2004. What explains Hadza food sharing? Socioeconomic aspects of human behavioral ecology. Special issue, Research in Economic Anthropology 23:69-88.
33. Munier, B., and C. Zaharia. 2002. High stakes and acceptance behavior in ultimatum bargaining: A contribution from an international experiment. Theory and Decision 53:187-207.
34. Oosterbeek, H., R. Sloof, and G. van de Kuilen. 2004. Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7:171-88.
35. Paciotti, B., and C. Hadley. 2003. The ultimatum game in Southwestern Tanzania: Ethnic variation and institutional scope. Current Anthropology 44:427-32.
36. Quinlan, M.B. 2004. From the bush: The front line of health care in a Caribbean village. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37. Quinlan, R.Q. 2006. Gender and risk in a matrifocal Caribbean community: A view from behavioral ecology. American Anthropologist 108:464-79.
38. Rosenthal, R., and M.R. DiMatteo. 2001. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review Psychology 52:59-82.
39. Roth, A.E. 1995. Introduction to experimental economics. In The handbook of experimental economics, eds. J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth, 3-109. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Roth, A.E., V. Prasniker, M. Okuno-Fujiwara, and S. Zamir. 1991. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Lbubliana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81:1068-95.
41. Slonim, R., and A.E. Roth. 1998. Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica 66:569-96.
42. Thaler, R. 1987. The psychology of choice and the assumptions of economics. In Laboratory experimentation in economics: Six points of view, ed. A. E. Roth, 99-130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Weber, J.M., S. Kopelman, and D.M. Messick. 2004. A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8:281-307.
44. Weg, E., and V. Smith. 1993. On the failure to induce meager offers in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Psychology 14:17-32.
45. Weissner, P. 2009. Experimental games and games of life among the Ju/'hoansi Bushmen. Current Anthropology 50:133-38.