The importance of colour, fat content and freshness in the purchase of beef in temuco, la araucanía region, Chile;Importancia del color, contenido de grasa y frescura en la compra de la carne bovina en temuco, región de la araucanía, Chile

Revista Cientifica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 623-632

  Schnettler, Berta ^a   Ciesla, Muriel ^a   Candia, Andrea ^a   Llancanpán, Felipe ^a   Sepúlveda, José ^a   Denegri, Marianela ^a   Miranda, Horacio ^a   Sepúlveda, Néstor ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Beef; Intrinsic attributes; Price; Purchase decision

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650673347     PISSN: 07982259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ADIMARK. Mapa socioeconómico de Chile. 2004. En Línea: http://www.adimark.cl/medios/estudios/informe_mapa_socioeconomico_de_chile.pdf. 20 de octubre, 2005.
2. ARENAS DE M. L.; JEREZ-TIMAURE, N; ORTEGA, A.J.; HUERTA-LEIDENZ, N; GUIFFRIDA-MENDOZA, M. Requerimientos de calidad de la carne vacuna exigidos por el consumidor venezonalo. Caso Región Zuliana. XX Reunión Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 15(Supl.1): 437. 2007.
3. BARRERA, R.; SÁNCHEZ, M. Consumption frequency and degree of abstraction: A study using the laddering technique on beef consumers. Food Qual. Pref. 20: 144-155. 2009.
4. BEARDSWORTH, A.; BRYMAN, A.; KEIL, T.; GOODE, J.; HASLAM, C.; LANCASHIRE, E. Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices. Br. Food J. 107(7): 470-491. 2002.
5. BECKER, T. Consumer perceptions of fresh meat quality: a framework for analysis. Br. Food J. 102(3): 158-176. 2000.
6. BERNUÉS, A.; OLAIZOLA, A.; CORCORAN, K. Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Sci. 65: 1095-1106. 2003.
7. BOLEMAN, S. J.; BOLEMAN, S. L.; MILLER, R. K.; TAYLOR, J. F.; CROSS, H. R.; WHEELER, T. L.; KOOHMARAIE, M.; SHACKELFORD, S. D.; MILLER, M. F.; WEST, R. L.; JOHNSON, D. D.; SAVELL, J. W. Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 1521-1524. 1997.
8. CARPENTER, C.; CORNFORTH, D.; WHITTIER, D. Consumer preferences for beef color and packaging did not affect eating satisfaction. Meat Sci. 57: 359-363. 2001.
9. COSGROVE, M.; FLYNN, A.; KIELY, M. Consumption of red meat, white meat and processed meat in Irish adults in relation to dietary quality. Br. J. Nutr. 93: 933-942. 2005.
10. DRANSFIELD, E.; ZAMORA, F.; BAYLE, M. C. Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index. Food Qual. Prefer. 9(5): 321-326. 1998.
11. th Ed. The Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA. 235 pp. 1995.
12. FERNÁNDEZ, A. Muestreo y trabajo de campo. Investigación y técnicas de mercado. Ed. Esic. España. 143-163 pp. 2002.
13. FICA, D. Factores que condicionan la decisión de compra de distintos tipos de carne en la ciudad de Temuco, Región de La Araucanía, Chile. Universidad de La Frontera. Tesis de Grado. 177 pp. 2008.
14. FIDAN, H. The impacts of beef prices and VAT on chicken meat consumption: a partial equilibrium approach. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 29: 1083-1091. 2005.
15. FISHER, C.; BOWLES, D. Consumer preferences. Hard-Boiled Reality: Animal Welfare-Friendly Egg Production in a global market. Royal Society for the protection of animals, Horsham, U.K. 256 pp. 2002.
16. GELLYNCK, X.; VERBEKE, W.; VERMEIRE, B. Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. Meat Sci. 74: 161-171. 2006.
17. GLITSCH, K. Consumer perceptions of fresh meat quality: cross-national comparison. Br. Food J. 102(3): 177-194. 2000.
18. GOODSON, K.; MORGAN, W.; REAGAN, J.; GWARTNEY, B.; COURINGTON, S.; WISE, J.; SAVELL, J. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks. J. Anim. Sci. 80(2): 401-408. 2002.
19. GRUNERT, K. G. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Qual. Pref. 8(3): 157-174. 1997.
20. GUENTHER, P.; JENSEN, H.; BATRES-MAEQUEZ, P.; CHUN-FU, CH. Socio-demographic, knowledge, and attitudinal factors related to meat consumption in the United States. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 105(8): 1266-1274. 2005.
21. HAIR, J.; ANDERSON, R.; TATHAM, R.; BLACK, W. Análisis cluster. Análisis Multivariante. Ed. Prentice Hall Internacional. Inc. España. 407-454 pp. 1999.
22. HENSON, S.; NORTHERN, J. Consumer assessment of the safety of beef at the point of purchase: a pan-European study. J. Agric. Econ. 51(1): 90-105. 2000.
23. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICAS (INE). Síntesis geográfica regional. Compendio estadístico 2005. Chile. 2005. En Línea: http://ine.cl/canales/publicaciones/ compendio estadistico/pdf/2005/3.pdf. 20 de diciembre, 2006.
24. JACKMAN, P.; SUN, D.W.; DU, CH.; ALLEN, P. Prediction of beef eating qualities from colour, marbling and wavelet surface texture features using homogenous carcass treatment. Pattern Recognition 42(5): 751-763. 2009.
25. KILLINGER, K.M.; CALKINS, C.R.; UMBERGER, W.J.; FEUZ, D.M.; ESKRIDGE, K.M. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 3288-3293. 2004.
26. KRYSTALLIS, A.; ARVANITOYANNIS, I. Investigating the concept of meat quality from the consumers' perspective: The case of Greece. Meat Sci. 72: 164-176. 2006.
27. KUBBEROD, E.; UELAND, O.; RODBOTTEN, M.; WESTAD, F.; RISVIK, E. Gender specific preferences and attitudes toward meat. Food Qual. Prefer. 13: 285-294. 2002.
28. LOUREIRO, M.L.; UMBERGER, W.L. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-oforigin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 32: 496-514. 2007.
29. MCCARTHY, M.; DE BOER, M.; O'REILLY, S.; COTTER, L. Factors influencing intention to purchase beef in the Irish market. Meat Sci. 65: 1071-1083. 2003.
30. MORRISON, J.A.; BALCOMBE, K.; BAILEY, A.; KLONARIS, S.; RAPSOMANIKIS, G. Expenditure on different categories of meat in Greece: the influence of changing tastes. Agric Econ. 28: 139-150. 2003.
31. OFICINA DE ESTUDIOS Y POLITICAS AGRARIAS (ODEPA). Agricultura y mercados/Ganado y carnes. Temporada de carne bovina. 2007. En Línea: https:// www.odepa.gob.cl/odepaweb/servlet/contenidos.Servlet DetallesScr;jsessionid=C152D24173C8F6C5DCAF9DF FA681BF63?idcla=1andidcat=andidn=1961. 24 de junio, 2007.
32. OFICINA DE ESTUDIOS Y POLITICAS AGRARIAS (ODEPA). Boletín de los consumidores. Comportamiento de precios a consumidor de productos cárnicos. Chile. 2009. En Línea: http://www.odepa.gob.cl/odepaweb/publicaciones/ doc /2216.pdf. 2 de septiembre, 2009.
33. OFICINA DE ESTUDIOS Y POLITICAS AGRARIAS (ODEPA). Mercado de la carne de ave. Chile. 2009. En Línea: http:// www.odepa.gob.cl/odepaweb/publicaciones/ doc/2147.pdf. 4 de septiembre, 2009.
34. Oficina de Estudios y Politicas agrarias (ODEPA). La carne de cerdo. Chile. 2009. En Línea: http://www.odepa. gob.cl/odepaweb/publicaciones/doc/2181.pdf. 4 de septiembre, 2009.
35. RESURRECCION, A.V.A. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meats products. Meat Sci. 66: 11-20. 2003
36. REVILLA, I.; VIVAR-QUINTANA, A.M. Effect of breed and ageing time on meat quality and sensory attributes of veal calves of the "ternera de Aliste"quality label. Meat Sci. 73: 189-195. 2006
37. ROBBINS, K.; JENSEN, J.; RYAN, K.J.; HOMCO-RYAN, C.; MCKEITH, F.K.; BREWER, M.S. Consumer attitudes towards beef and acceptability of enhanced beef. Meat Sci. 65: 721-729. 2003.
38. SCHNETTLER, B.; MANQUILEF, O.; MIRANDA, H. Hábitos de consumo de carne bovina en Temuco, IX Región de Chile. Idesia 24(2): 15-23. 2006.
39. SCHNETTLER, B.; FICA, D.; SEPÚLVEDA, N.; DENEGRI, M. "Health, Convenience or Price? Effect on Beef Preferences in a Developing Country". First European Food Congress. Eslovenia, Ljubljana, 11/4-9. 456-459pp. 2008.
40. SCHNETTLER, B.; VIDAL, R.; SILVA, R.; VALLEJOS, L.; SEPÚLVEDA, N. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Beef Meat in a Developing Country: The Effect of Information Regarding Country of Origin, Price and Animal Handling Prior to Slaughter. Food Qual. Pref. 20: 156-165. 2009.
41. SCHNETTLER, B.; FICA, D.; SEPÚLVEDA, N.; SEPÚLVEDA, J.; DENEGRI, M. Valoración de atributos intrínsecos y extrínsecos en la compra de la carne bovina en el sur de Chile. Rev. Científ. FCV-LUZ. XX(1): 101-109. 2010.
42. SEVERIANO-PÉREZ, P.; VIVAR-QUINTANA, A.M. Determination and evaluation of the parameters affecting the choice of veal meat of the "Ternera de Aliste" quality appellation. Meat Sci. 73:491-497 2006.
43. STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (SPSS), for Windows. Versión 14,0. SPSS Inc. Chicago. USA. 2005.
44. STEENKAMP, J.B.E.M. Product quality: an investigation into the concept and how it is perceived by consumers. Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands. 288 pp. 1989.
45. USDA/ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE. Changing consumer demands create opportunities for U.S. food system. Food Rev. 25(1): 19-22. 2002.
46. VERBEKE, W.; WARD, R.; VIAENE, J. Probit analysis of fresh meat consumption in Belgium: exploring BSE and television communication impact. Agribus. 16: 215-234. 2000.
47. VERBEKE, W.; WARD, R. Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Qual. Prefer. 17: 453-467. 2006.
48. YEN, S.; HUANG, CH. Cross-sectional estimation of U.S. demand for beef products: a censored system approach. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 27(2): 320-334. 2002.