Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 990-998

  Chang, Yun Woo ^a   Kwon, Kui Hyang ^a   Choi, Deuk Lin ^a   Lee, Dong Wha ^a   Lee, Min Hyuk ^a   Lee, Hye Kyung ^b   Yang, Seung Boo ^c   Kim, Yongbae ^d   Seo, Dae Young ^e  

^a Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Department of Radiology   (South Korea)

^c Soonchunhyang Gumi Hospital   (South Korea)

^d Soonchunhyang University   (South Korea)

^e Korea Polytechnic University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; MR imaging; Prognostic factors

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGIES; AXILLARY LYMPH NODES; BI-RADS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DATA SYSTEMS; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; IMAGING FEATURES; KINETIC ANALYSIS; LYMPH NODE; MICROVASCULAR; MR IMAGING; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR; PROGNOSTIC FACTORS; SUBTRACTION IMAGING; TUMOR SIZE; UNIVARIATE;

BODY FLUIDS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DECISION MAKING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TUMORS;

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KI-67 ANTIGEN; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RECEPTOR, ERBB-2; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 70449135324     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841850903225180     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;/238:/42-53.
2. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe S, Wardelmann E, Hocke A, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000;/215:/267-79.
3. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Tot T, Bone B. Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol 2003;/ 13:/2423-35.
4. Fischer U, Kopka L, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E. Prognostic value of contrastenhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 1997;/7:/1002-5.
5. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;/220:/13-30.
6. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;/191:/625-31.
7. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001;/219:/484-94.
8. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;/211:/5-7.
9. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, Marx C, Facius M, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. Am J Roentgenol 2005;/185:/964-70.
10. ACR BI-RADS†-MRI. First edition. American College of Radiology; 2003.
11. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, Winston JS, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;/197:/387-95.
12. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000;/217:/841-8.
13. Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ, Cha JH, Cho KS, Ko ES, et al. Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 2008;/9:/10-8.
14. Bone B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, Veress B. Contrastenhanced MR imaging as a prognostic indicator of breast cancer. Acta Radiol 1998;/39:/279-84.
15. Mussrakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumor grade and other histological factors. Br J Radiol 1997;/70:/446-51.
16. Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK. Signi.cance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;/17:/2334-40.
17. Yaghan R, Stanton PD, Robertson KW, Going JJ, Murray D, McArdle CS. Estrogen receptor status predicts local recurrence following breast conservation surgery for early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998;/ 24:/424-6.
18. Elston CW, Ellis IO, Pinder SE. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1999;/ 31:/209-23.
19. Levekin C, Ellis IO, Locker A, Robertson JF, Bell J, Nicholson R, et al. c-erbB2 oncoprotein expression in primary and advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1991;/ 63:/439-43.
20. Ikeda O, Nishimura R, Miyayama H, Yasunaga T, Ozaki Y, Tuji A, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis using dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of plasma vascular endothelia growth factor, hemodynamic, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Acta Radiol 2004;/45:/446-52.
21. Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol 1999;/182:/ 311-22.
22. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991;/19:/403-10.
23. Buada LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, Hashiguchi N, Sakai S, Masuda K, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996;/200:/639-49.
24. Schnall MD. An overview of interpretation strategies for breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001;/9:/289-94.