Testing IGRF-11 candidate models against CHAMP data and quasi-definitive observatory data

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 805-814

  Chulliat, Arnaud ^a   Thébault, Erwan ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Geomagnetic secular variation; IGRF; Magnetic observatories; Main field

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MODEL VALIDATION; MODELING; SATELLITE DATA; SECULAR VARIATION; TESTING METHOD; CHAMP; DATA SET; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD;

EID: 78650610450     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5047/eps.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chulliat, A., E. Thébault, and G. Hulot, Core field acceleration pulse as a common cause for the 2003 and 2007 geomagnetic jerks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L07301, doi:10.1029/2009GL042019, 2010.
2. Cohen, Y., M. Alexandrescu, G. Hulot, and J.-L. Le Mouël, Candidate models for the 1995 revision of IGRF, a worldwide evaluation based on observatory monthly means, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 279-290, 1997.
3. Courtillot, V., J. Ducruix, and J.-L. Le Mouël, Sur une accélération récente de la variation séculaire du champ magnétique terrestre, C. R. Acad. Sci. D, 287, 1095-1098, 1978.
4. Finlay, C. C., S. Maus, C. D. Beggan, M. Hamoudi, F. J. Lowes, N. Olsen, and E. Thébault, Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11, Earth Planets Space, 62, this issue, 787-804, 2010.
5. Fournier, A., G. Hulot, D. Jault, W. Kuang, A. Tangborn, N. Gillet, E. Canet, J. Aubert, and F. Lhuillier, An introduction to data assimilation and predictability in geomagnetism, Space Sci. Rev., doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9669-4, 2010 (in press).
6. Kuvshinov, A. and N. Olsen, 3-D modelling of the magnetic fields due to ocean tidal flow, in Earth Observation with CHAMP, Results from Three Years in Orbit, edited by C. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert, 628 pp, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
7. Lowes, F. J., T. Bondar, V. P. Golovkov, B. Langlais, S. Macmillan, and M. Mandea, Evaluation of the candidate Main Field model for IGRF 2000 derived from preliminary Ørsted data, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1183-1186, 2000.
8. Maus, S. and P. Weidelt, Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a ID conductivity model of the Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12614, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020232,2004.
9. Maus, S., S. Macmillan, F. Lowes, and T. Bondar, Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for the 10th generation of IGRF, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1173-1181, 2005.
10. Maus, S., C. Manoj, J. Rauberg, I. Michaelis, and H. Lühr, NOAA/NGDC candidate models for the 11th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field and the concurrent release of the 6th generation Pomme magnetic model, Earth Planets Space, 62, this issue, 729-735, 2010.
11. Olsen, N. and M. Mandea, Investigation of a secular variation impulse using satellite data: The 2003 geomagnetic jerk, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 255, 94-105, 2007.
12. Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and F. Lowes, New parameterization of external and induced fields in geomagnetic field modeling, and a candidate model for IGRF 2005, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1141-1149, 2005.
13. Olsen, N., M. Mandea, T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, CHAOS2-A geomagnetic field model derived from one decade of continuous satellite data, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 1477-1487, 2009.
14. Olsen, N., M. Mandea, T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, The CHAOS3 geomagnetic field model and candidates for the 11 th generation IGRF, Earth Planets Space, 62, this issue, 719-727, 2010.
15. Peltier, A. and A. Chulliat, On the feasibility of promptly producing quasidefinitive magnetic observatory data. Earth Planets Space, 62, e5-e8, 2010.
16. Thébault, E., A. Chulliat, S. Maus, G. Hulot, B. Langlais, A. Chambodut, and M. Menvielle, IGRF candidate models at times of rapid changes in core field acceleration, Earth Planets Space, 62, this issue, 753-763, 2010.