Evaluation of the candidate Main Field model for IGRF 2000 derived from preliminary Ørsted data

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 1183-1186

  Lowes, F J ^a   Bondar, T ^b   Golovkov, V P ^b   Langlais, B ^c   Macmillan, S ^d   Mandea, M ^c  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b PUSHKOV INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL MAGNETISM   (Russian Federation)

^c INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

^d Geological Survey Murchison House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SATELLITE DATA; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; SECULAR VARIATION;

EID: 0012573904     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03352350     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Langlais, B. and M. Mandea, An IGRF candidate main geomagnetic field model for epoch 2000 and a secular variation model for2000-2005, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue,1137-1148, 2000.
2. Langlais, B., P. Ultré-GuØrard, C. Vernin, M. Mandea, Y. Cohen, and G. Hulot, Ørsted: IPGP commissioning of the OVH magnetometer, CNES report, OERS-RP-0000-0031-IPG, 28 pp., 1999.
3. Lowes, F.J., The working of the IGRF 2000 Task Force, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue,1171-1174, 2000.
4. Menvielle, M. and A. Berthelier, The derived planetary indices: description and availability, Rev. ofGeophys., 29,415-432, 1991.
5. Olsen, N., T.J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, Determination of the IGRF 2000 model, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue,1175-1182, 2000.
6. Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, Free software helps map and display data, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 72,441-448, 1991.