New parameterization of external and induced fields in geomagnetic field modeling, and a candidate model for IGRF 2005

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 57, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1141-1149

  Olsen, Nils ^a   Sabaka, Terence J ^b   Lowes, Frank ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geomagnetic Reference Model; IGRF DGRF; Induction; Magnetospheric currents; Spherical harmonic analysis

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION;

EID: 31444454338     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03351897     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Holme, R., Modelling of attitude error in vector magnetic data: application to Ørsted data. Earth Planets Space, 52, 1187-1197, 2000.
2. Holme, R. and J. Bloxham, The treatment of attitude errors in satellite geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 98, 221-233, 1996.
3. Holme, R., N. Olsen, M. Rother, and H. Lühr, CO2: A CHAMP magnetic field model, in First CHAMP Mission results for Gravity, Magnetic and Atmospheric Studies, edited by C. Reigber, H. Lühr, and P. Schwintzer, pp. 220-225, Springer Verlag, 2003.
4. Kivelson, M. G. and C. T. Russell, Introduction to Space Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
5. Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, Large-scale, near-Earth magnetic fields from external sources and the corresponding induced internal field, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2487-2494, 1985a.
6. Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, The near-Earth magnetic field at 1980 determined from MAGSAT data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2495-2509, 1985b.
7. Langel, R. A. and W. J. Hinze, The Magnetic Field of the Earth's Lithosphere: The Satellite Perspective, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
8. Langel, R. A., G. D. Mead, E. R. Lancaster, R. H. Estes, and E. B. Fabiano Initial geomagnetic field model from Magsat vector data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 793-796, 1980.
9. Lowes, F. J. and N. Olsen, A more realistic estimate of the variances and systematic errors in spherical harmonic geomagnetic field models, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1027-1044, 2004.
10. Mauss, S. and H. Lühr, Signature of the quiet-time magnetospheric magnetic field and its electromagnetic induction in the rotating Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 162, 755-763, 2005.
11. Maus, S. and P. Weidelt, Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12,614, doi: 10. 1029/2004GL020,232, 2004.
12. Maus, S., H. Lühr, G. Balasis, M. Rother, and M. Mandea, Introducing POMME, the POtsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth, in Earth Observation with CHAMP, Results from Three Years in Orbit, edited by C. Reigher, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert, pp. 293-298, Springer Verlag, 2005a.
13. Maus, S., M. Rother, K. Hemant, H. Lühr, A. V. Kuvshinov, and N. Olsen, Earth's crustal magnetic field determined to spherical harmonic degree 90 from CHAMP satellite measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 2005b (submitted).
14. Olsen, N., A model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from øOrsted data, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 454-462, 2002.
15. Olsen, N., New parameterization of external and induced fields in geomagtic field modeling, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 6, 02, 454, 2004.
16. Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, Determination of the IGRF 2000 model, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1175-1182, 2000.
17. Olsen, N., F. Lowes, and T. J. Sabaka, Ionospheric and induced field leakage in geomagnetic field models, and derivation of candidate models for DGRF 1995 and DGRF 2000, Earth Planets Space, 57, this issue, 1191-1196, 2005.
18. Sabaka, T. J., N. Olsen, and M. Purucker, Extending comprehensive models of the Earth's magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data, Geophys. J. Int., 159, 521-547, doi: 10. 1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02,421.x, 2004.
19. Schmucker, U., Magnetic and electric fields due to electromagnetic induction by external sources, in Landolt-Börnstein, New-Series, 5/ 2b, pp. 100-125, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1985a.
20. Schmucker, U., Electrical properties of the Earth's interior, in Landolt-Börnstein, New-Series, 5/2b, pp. 370-397, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1985b.
21. Schmucker, U., Substitute conductors for electromagnetic response estimates, PAGEOPH, 125, 341-367, 1987.
22. Tsyganenko, N. A., Quantitative models of the magnetospheric magnetic field: methods and results, Space Sci. Rev., 54, 75-186, 1990.
23. Tsyganenko, N. A., A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 1. Mathematical structure, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 12-1, 2002a.
24. Tsyganenko, N. A., A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10-1, 2002b.
25. Utada, H., T. Koyama, H. Shimizu, and A. D. Chave, A semi-global reference model for electrical conductivity in the mid-mantle beneath the north Pacific region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 43-1, DOI 10.1029/ 2002GL016,092, 2003.