Peer relations, pro-social behavior and gender from elementary school to college in Colombia;Relaciones entre iguales, conducta prosocial y género desde la educación primaria hasta la universitaria en Colombia

Universitas Psychologica

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 357-370

  Plazas, Elberto Antonio ^a   Cotes, Mónica Lourdes Morón ^a   Santiago, Antonia ^a   Sarmiento, Humberto ^b   López, Sara Elvira Ariza ^c   Patino, Carlos Darío ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA   (Colombia)

^b Universidad Nacional Abierta   (Colombia)

^c Institución Educativa Nacional Loperena   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Antisocial behavior; Antisocial behavior APA PSYNET ; Controversial; Gender; Interpersonal relations; Neglected; Peers relationships; Popular; Prosocial behavior; Rejected; Sociometric category; Sociometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650526356     PISSN: 16579267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11144/javeriana.upsy9-2.ricp     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A. & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A crossage perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
2. De Bruyn, E. H. & Van den Boom, D. C. (2005). Interpersonal behavior, peer popularity, and self-esteem in early adolescence. Social Development, 14, 555-573.
3. De Rosier, M. E. & Thomas, J. M. (2003). Strengthening sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in the assessment of children' peer relations. Child Development, 75, 1379-1392.
4. Erdley, C. A., Nangle, D. W. & Gold, J. A. (1998). Operationalizing the construct of friendship among children: A psychometric comparison of sociometric-based definitional methodologies. Social Development, 7, 62-71.
5. Eshel, Y., Sharabany, R. & Barsade, E. (2003). Reciprocated and unreciprocated dyadic peer preferences and academic achievement of Israeli and immigrant students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 746-762.
6. Frederickson, N. L. & Furnhan, A. F. (1998). Use of sociometric techniques to assess the social stuatus of mainstreamed children with learning difficulties. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monograph, 124, 381-433.
7. Fukada, H., Fukada, S. & Hicks, J. (1997). The relationship between leadership and sociometric status among preescolar children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 481-486.
8. Green, K. D., Forehand, R., Beck, S. J. & Vosk, B. (1980). An assessment of the relationship among measures of children's social competence and children's academic achievement. Child Development, 51, 1149-1156.
9. Gresham, F. M. & Elliott, S. N. (1987). The relationship between adaptive behaviour and social skills: Issues in definition and assessment. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 167-181.
10. Hartup, W., Glazer, J. & Charlesworth, R. (1967). Peer reinforcement and sociometric status. Child Development, 38, 1017-1024.
11. Hayes, S. (2000). Peer assessment of children's prosocial behavior. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 47-60.
12. Hussong, A. M. (2000). Perceived peer context and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 391-415.
13. Luxen, M. F. (2005). Gerder differences in dominance and affiliation during a demanding interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 331-347.
14. Llopis, R. & Llopis, G. (2004). Bienestar familiar y relaciones de amistad: un estudio con adolescentes en el contexto escolar. Estudios sobre educación, 6, 59-75.
15. Maasen, G. H., Van der Linden, J. L. & Akkermans, W. (1997). Nominations, rating, and the dimensions of sociometrics status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 179-199.
16. Margolin, S. (2001). Interventions for nonaggressive peer-rejected children and adolescents: A review of the literature. Children & Schools, 23, 143-159.
17. Mestre, V., Samper, P. & Frías, D. (2004). Personalidad y contexto familiar como factores predictores de la disposición prosocial y antisocial de los adolescentes. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 36, 445-457.
18. Ostroy, J. M. & Keating, C. F. (2004). Gender differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Social Development, 13, 255-277.
19. Owen, L., Daly, A. & Slee, Ph. (2005). Sex and age differences in victimisation and conflict resolution among adolescents in a south Autralian school. Agressive Behavior, 31, 1-12.
20. Pakaslahti L., Karjalainen A. & Keltikargas-Järvinen L. (2002). Relationships between adolescent prosocial problem-solving, prosocial behaviour, and social acceptance. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 137-144.
21. Persson, G. E. B. (2005). Young children's prosocial and aggressive behaviors and their experiences of being targeted for similar behavior by peers. Social Development, 14, 206-228.
22. Plazas, E. A., Aponte, R. & Ariza, S. E. (2006). Relación entre estatus sociométrico, género y rendimiento académico. Revista Psicología desde El Caribe, 16, 176-195.
23. Risi, S., Gerhardstein, R. & Kitsner, J. (2003). Children's classroom peer relationschip and subsequent educational outcomes. Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 351-361.
24. Reijntjes, A., Stegge, H. & Meerum, M. (2006). Childreǹs coping with peer rejection: The role of depressive symptoms, social competence and gender. Infant and Child Development, 15, 89-107.
25. Retuerto, A. & Mestre, M. V. (2005). Influencia de las variables sexo, edad y educación formal en el razonamiento prosocial de adolescentes jóvenes. Psicología Educativa, 11, 27-50.
26. Sanson, A., Hemphill, S. A. & Smart, D. (2004). Connections between temperament and social development: A review. Social Development, 13, 142-170.
27. Sebanc, A. M. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: Links with prosocial behavior and aggression. Social Development, 12, 249-268.
28. Steinberg, L. & Sheffield, A. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110.
29. Szewczyk-Sokolowski, M., Bost, K. K. & Wainwright, A. B. (2005). Attachment, temperament, and preschool children's peer acceptance. Social Development, 14, 379-397.
30. Twenge, J., Ciarocco, N., Baumeister, R., De Wall, N. & Bartels, M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 92, 56-66.
31. Tur, A. M., Mestre, M. A. & Del Barrio, M. V. (2004). Factores moduladores de la conducta agresiva y prosocial: el efecto de los hábitos de crianza en la conducta del adolescente. Estrés y Ansiedad, 10, 75-88.
32. Vaillancourt, T., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M. & Tremblay, R. E. (2003). A longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis of indirect and physical aggression: Evidence of two factors over time? Child Development, 74, 1628-1638.
33. Vaillancourt, T. & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggresion and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396-408.
34. Van Lier, P., Vitaro, F., Wanner, B., Vuijk, P. & Crijnen, A. (2005). Gender differences in developmental links among antisocial behavior, friends' antisocial behavior, and peer rejection in childhood: Results from two cultures. Child Development, 75, 841-855.
35. Walker, S. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between young children's peer-related social competence and individual differences in theory of mind. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 297-312.
36. Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academia achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066-1078.
37. Wentzel, K. R. & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendship, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209.
38. Werner, N. E. & Crick, N. R. (2004). Maladaptative peer relationships and the development of relational and physical aggression during middle childhood. Social Development, 13, 495-514.
39. Yugar, J. M. & Shapiro, E. S. (2001). Elementary children's school friendship: A comparison of peer assessment methodologies. School Psychology Review, 30, 568-585.
40. Zettergren, P. (2003). School adjustment in adolescence for previously rejected, average and popular children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 207-221.
41. Zettergren, P. (2005). Childhood peer status as predictor of midadolescence peer situation and social adjustment. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 745-757.
42. Zhu, L., Xu, Zh. & Kong, R. (2000). A study of attention, behavior characteristics, and peer relations in children with learning disabilities. Psychological Science (China), 23, 556-559.