Solution-diffusion-film model for the description of pressure-driven trans-membrane transfer of electrolyte mixtures: One dominant salt and trace ions

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 368, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 192-201

  Yaroshchuk, Andriy ^a   Martínez Lladó, Xavier ^b   Llenas, Laia ^b   Rovira, Miquel ^b   de Pablo, Joan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b FUNDACIÓ CTM CENTRE TECNOLÒGIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Analytical solution; Concentration polarization; Diffusion permeability; Dominant salt; Electrolyte mixture; Film model; Membrane; Nanofiltration; Rejection; Single ion permeability; Solution diffusion model; Trace ion

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DIFFUSION PERMEABILITY; DOMINANT SALT; ELECTROLYTE MIXTURE; FILM MODEL; REJECTION; SINGLE-ION; SOLUTION-DIFFUSION MODEL; TRACE ION;

DIFFUSION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROLYTES; IONS; MIXTURES; NANOFILTRATION; POLARIZATION; SALTS;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CALCIUM; CHLORIDE; ELECTROLYTE; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SULFATE;

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NANOFILTRATION; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 78650521951     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.037     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Schaefer A., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications 2005, Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford.
2. Jacazio G., Probstein R.F., Sonin A.A., Yung D. Electrokinetic salt rejection in hyperfiltration through porous materials. Theory and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76:4015-4023.
3. Gross R.J., Osterle J.F. Membrane transport characteristics of ultrafine capillaries. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49:1.
4. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. Electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes by the space-charge model and the comparison with Teorell-Meyer-Sievers model. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 103:117-133.
5. Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112:263-274.
6. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
7. Chaabane T., Taha S., Taleb A.M., Maachi R., Dorange G. Coupled model film theory and the Nernst-Planck equation in nanofiltration. Desalination 2007, 206:424-432.
8. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C. Analysis of the salt retention of nanofiltration membranes using the Donnan-Steric Partitioning Pore Model. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1999, 34:3009-3030.
9. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. The electrostatic and steric hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135:19-32.
10. Bandini S., Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:3303-3326.
11. Labbez C., Fievet P., Thomas F., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti P. Evaluation of the "DSPM" model on a titania membrane: measurements of charged and uncharged solute retention, electrokinetic charge, pore size, and water permeability. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 2003, 262:200-211.
12. Szymczyk A., Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:77-88.
13. Merten U. Flow relationships in reverse osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1963, 2:229.
14. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Riley R.L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341.
15. Paul D.R. Solution-diffusion model for swollen membranes. Sep. Purif. Methods 1976, 5:33-50.
16. Kataoka T., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. Permeation equations developed for prediction of membrane performance in pervaporation, vapor permeation and reverse-osmosis based on the solution-diffusion model. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24:326-333.
17. Mccray S.B., Vilker V.L., Nobe K. Reverse-osmosis cellulose-acetate membranes. 2. Dependence of transport-properties on acetyl content. J. Membr. Sci. 1991, 59:317-330.
18. Sekino M. Precise analytical model of hollow-fiber reverse-osmosis modules. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 85:241-252.
19. Malek A., Hawlader M.N.A., Ho J.C. A lumped transport parameter approach in predicting b10 RO permeator performance. Desalination 1994, 99:19-38.
20. Wijmans J.G., Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model-a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:1-21.
21. Yaroshchuk A.E. Solution-diffusion-imperfection model revised. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 101:83-87.
22. Roh I.J., Kim J.J., Park S.Y. Mechanical properties and reverse osmosis performance of interfacially polymerized polyamide thin films. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 197:199-210.
23. Bodalo A., Gomez J.L., Gomez E., Leon G., Tejera M. Reduction of sulphate content in aqueous solutions by reverse osmosis using cellulose acetate membranes. Desalination 2004, 162:55-60.
24. Paul D.R. Reformulation of the solution-diffusion theory of reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 241:371-386.
25. Wijmans J.G. The role of permeant molar volume in the solution-diffusion model transport equations. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 237:39-50.
26. Bodalo A., Gomez J.L., Gomez E., Leon G., Tejera M. Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by reverse osmosis using cellulose acetate membranes. Desalination 2005, 184:149-155.
27. Oh H.J., Hwang T.M., Lee S. A simplified simulation model of RO systems for seawater desalination. Desalination 2009, 238:128-139.
28. Hung P.V.X., Cho S.H., Moon S.H. Prediction of boron transport through seawater reverse osmosis membranes using solution-diffusion model. Desalination 2009, 247:33-44.
29. Murthy Z.V.P., Gupta S.K. Estimation of mass transfer coefficient using a combined nonlinear membrane transport and film theory model. Desalination 1997, 109:39-49.
30. Chellam S., Taylor J.S. Simplified analysis of contaminant rejection during ground- and surface water nanofiltration under the information collection rule. Water Res. 2001, 35:2460-2474.
31. Peeva L.G., Gibbins E., Luthra S.S., White L.S., Stateva R.P., Livingston A.G. Effect of concentration polarisation and osmotic pressure on flux in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 236:121-136.
32. Zhao Y., Taylor J.S. Incorporation of osmotic pressure in an integrated incremental model for predicting RO or NF permeate concentration. Desalination 2005, 174:145-159.
33. Ku Y., Chen S.W., Wang W.Y. Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 43:135-142.
34. Zhao Y., Taylor J.S., Chellam S. Predicting RO/NF water quality by modified solution diffusion model and artificial neural networks. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 263:38-46.
35. Eriksson P., Kyburz M., Pergande W. NF membrane characteristics and evaluation for seawater processing applications. Desalination 2005, 184:281-294.
36. Mukherjee P., SenGupta A.K. Some observations about electrolyte permeation mechanism through reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:301-307.
37. Bader M.S.H. Nanofiltration for oil-fields water injection operations: analysis of concentration polarization. Desalination 2006, 201:106-113.
38. Csefalvay E., Pauer V., Mizsey P. Recovery of copper from process waters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination 2009, 240:132-142.
39. Yaroshchuk A.E., Martínez-Lladó X., Llenas L., Rovira M., de Pablo J., Flores J., Rubio P. Mechanisms of transfer of ionic solutes through composite polymer nano-filtration membranes in view of their high sulfate/chloride selectivities. Desalination Water Treat. 2009, 6:48-53.
40. Bason S., Kedem O., Freger V. Determination of concentration-dependent transport coefficients in nanofiltration: experimental evaluation of coefficients. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:197-204.
41. Bason S., Kaufman Y., Freger V. Analysis of ion transport in nanofiltration using phenomenological coefficients and structural characteristics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114:3510-3517.
42. Lonsdale H.K., Pusch W., Walch A. Donnan-membrane effects in hyperfiltration of ternary systems. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1975, 1(71):501-514.
43. Gilron_ J., Gara N., Kedem O. Experimental analysis of negative salt rejection in nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185:223-236.
44. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Diafiltration by nanofiltration: prediction and optimization. AIChE J. 1998, 44:1799-1812.
45. Prokopovich P., Starov V., Holdich R.G. Concentration of inorganic salts in the permeate during nano- or ultrafiltration promoted by water-soluble polyelectrolytes in the feed solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:1358-1369.
46. Spiegler K.S., Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes. Desalination 1966, 1:311-326.
47. Yaroshchuk A.E. Osmosis and reverse osmosis in fine-porous charged diaphragms and membranes. Adv. Colloids Interface Sci. 1995, 60:1-93.
48. Schlögl R. Elektrodiffusion in freier Lösung und geladenen Membranen. Das allgemeine, zeitunabhängige Integral der Nernst-Planckschen Ionen-Bewegungsgleichungen für beliebige Elektrolyte. Z. Phys. Chem., Neue Folge 1954, 1:305.
49. Yaroshchuk A.E. Rejection of single salts vs. trans-membrane volume flow in RO/NF: thermodynamic properties, model of constant coefficients, and its modification. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 198:285-297.
50. Yaroshchuk A.E., Ribitsch V. The use of trace ions for advanced characterization of transport properties of nano-filtration membranes in electrolyte solutions: theoretical analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 201:85-94.
51. Vonk M.W., Smit J.A.M. Positive and negative ion retention curves of mixed electrolytes in reverse osmosis with a cellulose acetate membrane. An analysis on the basis of the generalized Nernst-Planck equation. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 1983, 96:121-134.
52. Ribau Teixeira M., João Rosa M., Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:160-166.
53. Mazzoni C., Bandini S. On nanofiltration Desal-5 DK performances with calcium chloride-water solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52:232-240.