Impact of different criteria for identifying intra-household interactions: A case study of household time allocation

Transportation

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 81-99

  Kang, Hejun ^a   Scott, Darren M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity analysis; Flexible criteria; GIS; Intra household interactions; Joint activities; Restrictive criteria; Structural equation modeling; Time use; Toronto Travel Activity Panel Survey

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION;

ACTIVITY ANALYSIS; FLEXIBLE CRITERIA; INTRA-HOUSEHOLD INTERACTION; JOINT ACTIVITY; RESTRICTIVE CRITERIA; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TIME USE; TRAVEL ACTIVITIES;

SURVEYS;

GIS; MODELING; PANEL DATA; TIME ALLOCATION; TRAVEL TIME;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; TORONTO;

EID: 78650520912     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-010-9292-y     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bagley, M. N., Mokhtarian, P. L.: Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: modeling and policy implications. Transportation 24, 203-226 (1997).
2. Bhat, C. R., Koppelman, F. S.: A conceptual framework of individual activity program generation. Transp. Res. Part A 27, 433-446 (1993).
3. Bhat, C. R., Misra, R.: Discretionary activity time allocation of individuals between in-home and out-of-home and between weekdays and weekends. Transportation 26, 193-209 (1999).
4. Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M.: Modeling intra-household interactions and group decision-making. Transportation 32, 443-448 (2005).
5. Bollen, K. A.: Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York (1989).
6. Bollen, K. A., Stine, R. A.: Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 21, 205-229 (1992).
7. Bradley, M., Vovsha, P.: A model for joint choice of daily activity pattern types of household members. Transportation 32, 545-571 (2005).
8. Chandraskharan, B., Goulias, K. G.: Exploratory longitudinal analysis of solo and joint trip making in the Puget Sound Transportation Panel. Transp. Res. Rec. 1676, 77-85 (1999).
9. Chou, C. P., Bentler, P. M.: Estimates and tests in structural equations modeling. In: Hoyle, R. H. (ed.) Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications, pp. 37-55. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995).
10. Doherty, S. T., Niemeier, D. A., Roorda, M. J., Miller, E. J.: Design and assessment of the Toronto area computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 1894, 140-149 (2004).
11. Fujii, S., Kitamura, R., Kishizawa, K.: Analysis of individuals' joint-activity engagement using a model system of activity-travel behavior and time use. Transp. Res. Rec. 1676, 11-19 (1999).
12. Gliebe, J. P., Koppelman, F. S.: A model of joint activity participation between household members. Transportation 29, 49-72 (2002).
13. Gliebe, J. P., Koppelman, F. S.: Modeling household activity-travel interactions as parallel constrained choices. Transportation 32, 449-471 (2005).
14. Golob, T. F.: Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp. Res. Part B 37, 1-25 (2003).
15. Golob, T. F., McNally, M. G.: A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transp. Res. Part B 31, 177-194 (1997).
16. Goulias, K. G., Kim, T. J.: An analysis of activity type classification and issues related to the with whom and for whom questions of an activity diary. In: Timmermans, H. J. P. (ed.) Progress in activity-based analysis, pp. 309-334. Elsevier, Oxford (2005).
17. Hoogland, J. J., Boomsma, A.: Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: an overview and a meta-analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 26, 329-367 (1998).
18. Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., Kano, Y.: Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychol. Bull. 112, 351-362 (1992).
19. Jones, P., Clark, M.: The significance and measurement of variability in travel behaviour. Transportation 15, 65-87 (1988).
20. Jones, P. M., Koppelman, F. S., Orfeuil, J. P.: Activity analysis: state of the art and future directions. In: Jones, P. (ed.) Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis, pp. 34-55. Gower, Aldershot (1990).
21. Kang, H.: Social integration of elderly Americans: a time-use perspective. The 106th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers. Washington, DC (2010).
22. Kang, H., Scott, D. M.: An integrated spatio-temporal GIS toolkit for exploring intra-household interactions. Transportation 35, 253-268 (2008).
23. Kang, H., Scott, D. M., Doherty, S. T.: An investigation of planning priority of joint activities in the household activity scheduling process. Transp. Res. Rec. 2134, 82-88 (2009).
24. Kato, H., Matsumoto, M.: Joint resource allocation model of household consisting of a husband, a wife and a child for non-work activities: comparative analysis of Tokyo and Toyama, Japan. The 6th Swiss Transport research Conference. Monte Verità, Ascona (2006).
25. Kitamura, R.: Applications of models of activity behavior for activity based demand forecasting. Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference. Washington, DC: Travel Model Improvement Program, US Department of Transportation and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996).
26. Kline, R. B.: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York (2005).
27. Kuppam, A. R., Pendyala, R. M.: A structural equations analysis of commuters' activity and travel patterns. Transportation 28, 33-54 (2001).
28. Lei, M., Lomax, R. G.: The effect of varying degrees of non-normality in structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Modeling 12, 1-27 (2005).
29. Lu, X., Pas, E. I.: Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part A 33, 1-18 (1999).
30. Meister, K., Frick, M., Axhausen, K. W.: A GA-based household scheduler. Transportation 32, 473-494 (2005).
31. Miller, E. J., Roorda, M. J.: Prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831, 114-121 (2003).
32. Mokhtarian, P. L., Meenakshisundaram, R.: Beyond tele-substitution: disaggregate longitudinal structural equations modeling of communication impacts. Transp. Res. Part C 7, 33-52 (1999).
33. Ory, D. T., Mokhtarian, P. L.: The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior. Qual. Quant. 44, 427-445 (2010).
34. Pendyala, R. M.: Time use and travel behavior in space and time. In: Goulias, K. G. (ed.) Transportation systems planning: methods and applications, pp 2-1-2-37. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003).
35. Scott, D. M., Kanaroglou, P. S.: An activity-episode generation model that captures interactions between household heads: development and empirical analysis. Transp. Res. Part B 36, 875-896 (2002).
36. Sener, I. N., Bhat, C. R.: An analysis of the social context of children's discretionary activity participation. Transportation 34, 697-721 (2007).
37. Shaw, S. L., Wang, D.: Handling disaggregate spatiotemporal travel data in GIS. GeoInformatica 4, 161-178 (2000).
38. Simma, A., Axhausen, K. W.: Within-household allocation of travel-case of Upper Austria. Transp. Res. Rec. 1752, 523-544 (2001).
39. Singhi, P.: Analysis of joint trips using C++ in Mobidrive. Arbeitsbericht Verkehrsund Raumplanung 87, Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transporttechnik, Strassenund Eisenbahnbau, ETH, Zürich (2001).
40. Srinivasan, K. K., Athuru, S. R.: Analysis of within-household effects and between-household differences in maintenance activity allocation. Transportation 32, 495-521 (2005).
41. Srinivasan, S., Bhat, C. R.: Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation. Transportation 32, 523-544 (2005).
42. Srinivasan, S., Bhat, C. R.: A multiple discrete-continuous model for independent- and joint-discretionary-activity participation decisions. Transportation 33, 497-515 (2006).
43. Srinivasan, S., Bhat, C. R.: An exploratory analysis of joint-activity participation characteristics using the American time use survey. Transportation 35, 301-327 (2008).
44. Townsend, T. A.: The Effects of household characteristics on the multi-day time allocations and travel activity patterns of households and their members. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, (1987).
45. Ullman, J. B.: Structural equation modeling. In: Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (eds.) Using multivariate statistics, pp. 709-819. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York (1996).
46. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., Donnelly, R.: Explicit modeling of joint travel by household members: statistical evidence and applied approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831, 1-10 (2003).
47. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., Donnelly, R.: A model for allocation of maintenance activities to household members. Transp. Res. Rec. 1894, 170-179 (2004).
48. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., Curran, P. J.: Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies. In: Hoyle, R. H. (ed.) Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications, pp. 56-75. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995).
49. Zhang, J., Timmermans, H. J. P., Borgers, A.: A model of household task allocation and time use. Transp. Res. Part B 39, 81-95 (2005).