Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: Modeling and policy implications

Transportation

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 203-226

  Bagley, Michael N ^a   Mokhtarian, Patricia L ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Home based telecommuting; Preference model; Telecommuting center

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PUBLIC POLICY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

TELECOMMUTING;

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

LOGIT ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PLANNING METHOD; PREFERENCE MODEL; TELECOMMUTING; TRANSPORT PLANNING;

EID: 0031200969     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004924601411     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bagley MN, Mannering JS & Mokhtarian PL (1994) Telecommuting Centers and Related Concepts: A Review of Practice. University of California at Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-94-4. Prepared for the California Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement: Sacramento CA.
2. Bagley MN (1995) Binary & Multinomial Logit Models of the Preference for Center-Based Telecommuting. Master's Thesis, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis. Available as Research Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-95-16 University of California Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies.
3. Ben-Akiva M & Lerman S (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory & Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
4. Bernardino A, Ben-Akiva M & Salomon I (1993) A stated preference approach to modeling the adoption of telecommuting. Transportation Research Record 1413: 22-30.
5. Bernardino A & Ben-Akiva M (1994) Adoption of telecommuting: The employer's perspective. Prepared for the European Assembly on Teleworking & New Ways of Working: Berlin November 3-4.
6. Greene WH (1995) LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.
7. Healy T (1968) Transportation or communications - some broad considerations. IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology 16(2): 195-198.
8. Hauser J (1978) Testing the accuracy, usefulness and significance of probabilistic choice models: An information-theoretic approach. Operations Research 26(3): 406-421.
9. Hausman J & McFadden D (1984) Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 52(5): 1219-1240.
10. Mahmassani H, Yen J, Herman R & Sullivan M (1993) Employee attitudes & stated preferences towards telecommuting: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Research Record 1413: 31-41.
11. Mannering J & Mokhtarian P (1995) Modeling the choice of telecommuting frequency in California: An exploratory analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 49(1): 49-73.
12. McFadden D, Train K & Tye W (1977) An application of diagnostic tests for the independence from irrelevant alternatives property of the multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Record 637: 39-46.
13. Mokhtarian P (1991) Defining telecommuting. Transportation Research Record 1305: 273-281.
14. Mokhtarian PL, Balepur N, Derr M, Ho C-I, Stanek D & Varma K (1996) Residential Area-Based Offices Project: Interim Findings Report on the Evaluation of Impacts. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Research Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-96-11, November.
15. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (1994) Modeling the choice of telecommuting: Setting the context. Environment & Planning A 26(5): 749-766.
16. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (1995) Modeling the Preference for Telecommuting: Measuring Attitudes & Other Variables. Research Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-95-17: University of California at Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies.
17. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (1996a) Modeling the choice of telecommuting 2: A case of the preferred impossible alternative. Environment & Planning A 28: 1859-1876.
18. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (1996b) Modeling the choice of telecommuting 3: Identifying the choice set and estimating binary choice models for technology-based alternatives. Environment & Planning A 28: 1877-1894.
19. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (1997) Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models. Transportation Research A 31(1): 35-50.
20. Small K & Hsiao C (1985) Multinomial logit specification tests. International Economic Review 26(3): 619-627.
21. Stanek D & Mokhtarian P (forthcoming) Developing models of preference for home-based and center-based telecommuting: Findings and forecasts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
22. Sullivan M, Mahmassani H & Yen J (1993) A choice model of employee participation in telecommuting under a cost-neutral scenario. Transportation Research Record 1413: 42-48.
23. Yen J & Mahmassani H (1994) Telecommuting adoption: Conceptual framework & model estimation. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.