A persuasion dialog for gaining access to information

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4946 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 63-79

  Perrussel, Laurent ^a   Doutre, Sylvie ^a   Thévenin, Jean Marc ^a   McBurney, Peter ^b  

^a IRIT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

ARGUMENTATION DIALOGS; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; GAINING ACCESS; GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION SOURCES; REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION; TWO AGENTS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 77249166758     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78915-4_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning 29(2), 125-169 (2002)
2. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Perrussel, L.: An Argumentation Framework based on contextual Preferences. In: Proc. of FAPR 2000, London, pp. 59-67 (January 2000)
3. Andreka, H., Ryan, M., Schobbens, P.: Operators and Laws for Combining Preference Relations. In: Wieringa, R., Feenstra, R. (eds.) Information Systems: Correctness and Reusability (Selected Papers), World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore (1995)
4. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., McBurney, P.: A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. In: Rahwan, et al. (eds.), [21fl, pp. 149-161
5. Bench-Capon, T.: Specifying the interaction between information sources. In: Quirchmayr, G., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Schweighofer, E. (eds.) DEXA 1998. LNCS, vol. 1460, pp. 425-434. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
6. Bench-Capon, T.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
7. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Chaib-draa, B.: Specifying and implementing a persuasion dialogue game using commitments and arguments. In: Rahwan, et al. (eds.), [21], pp. 130-148.
8. Boella, G., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.: Argument games for interactive access control. In: Proc. of WI 2005, pp. 751-754. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2005)
9. Boella, G., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.: Argumentation for access control. In: Proc. AIIA 2005, pp. 86-97 (2005)
10. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 378-389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
11. Dijkstra, P., Bex, F., Prakken, H., de Vey Mestdagh, K.: Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. In: Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 133-151 (2005)
12. Doutre, S., McBurney, P., Perrussel, L., Thévenin, J.M.: Arguing for gaining access to information. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2007, ACM, New York (2007)
13. Doutre, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M., Barden, W.: Information-seeking agent dialogs with permissionsand arguments. Technical Report ULCS-05-010, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (2005)
14. Dung, P.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming, and N-Person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(32), 321-357 (1995)
15. FIPA.: Communicative Act Library Specification. Standard SC00037J, Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, 3 (December 2002)
16. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Adaptative agent negotiation via argumentation. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2006 (2006)
17. Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M.: The mechanics of some formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Dignum, F. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 329-348. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
18. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 347-376 (2003)
19. Prakken, H.: On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In: Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L., Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzmán, I.P. (eds.) JELIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1919, pp. 224-238. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
20. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4, 331-368 (1996)
21. Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P., Reed, C. (eds.): ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
22. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S., Jennings, N., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18, 343-375 (2003)
23. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitments in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press (1995)