Strategic argumentation: A game theoretical investigation

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 81-90

  Roth, Bram ^a   Riveret, Régis ^a   Rotolo, Antonino ^a   Governatori, Guido ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Game theory; Predictive force

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

ARGUMENTATION; DEFEASIBLE LOGIC; PREDICTIVE FORCE; STANDARD PROBABILITY CALCULUS;

GAME THEORY;

EID: 34548016098     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1276318.1276333     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori, and M. J. Maher. Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2(2):255-287, 2001.
2. G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori and M. J. Maher. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference Information Systems, pages 20-=29, 1999.
3. G. Antoniou, D. Billington, and M. J. Maher. On the analysis of regulations using defeasible rules. In HICSS, 1999.
4. D.G. Baird, R.H. Gertner. R.C. Picker. Game Theory and the Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
5. T. Bench-Capon. Post congress tristesse. In Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game, pages pp 5-20. JURIX, 1998.
6. D. Billington. Defeasible logic is stable. Journal of Logic and Computation, 3(4):379-400, 1993.
7. M. Dastani, G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, and L. van der Torre. Programming cognitive agents in defeasible logic. In G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, editors, Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, 12th International Conference, volume 3835 of LNAI, pages 621-636. Springer, 2005.
8. A.P. Dempster. A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 30:205-247, 1968.
9. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: A clarification. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32(1-4):35-66, 2001.
10. H. Geffner and J. Pearl. Conditional Entailment: Bridging Two Approaches to Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 53(2-3): pp. 209-244, 1992.
11. T.F. Gordon. The pleadings game: formalizing procedural justice. In ICAIL '93: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pages 10-19, New York, NY, USA, 1993. ACM Press.
12. T.F. Gordon. The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
13. G. Governatori. Representing business contracts in RuleML. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 14(2-3):181-216, 2005.
14. G. Governatori, M. Dumas, A. H. ter Hofstede, and P. Oaks. A formal approach to protocols and strategies for (legal) negotiation. In H. Prakken, editor, Procedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 168-177. ACM Press, 2001.
15. G. Governatori, M.J. Maher, G. Antoniou, and D. Billington. Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 14(5):675-702, 2004.
16. G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, and V. Padmanabhan. The cost of social agents. In P. Stone and G. Weiss, editors, 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pages 513-520, New York, 10-12 May 2006. ACM Press.
17. J.C. Hage. Reasoning with Rules. An essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law and Philosophy Library, 1997.
18. J.C. Hage and B. Verheij. Reason-Based Logic: a logic for reasoning with rules and reasons. Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 3(2/3):130-155, 1994.
19. A.R. Lodder. DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialog games. Dissertation Universiteit Maastricht, 1998.
20. M. J. Maher. Prepositional defeasible logic has linear complexity. Theory Practice Logic Programming, 1(6):691-711, 2001.
21. D. Nute. Defeasible Reasoning. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming (eds. Gabbay, D., Hogger, C. and Robinson, J.), Vol 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 353-395, 1994.
22. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, 1999.
23. H. Prakken. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal Logic and Computation, 15(6):1009-1040, 2005.
24. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4(3-4):331-368, 1996.
25. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6(2-4):231-287, 1998.
26. J. Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
27. A.C. Roth. Case-based reasoning in the law. A formal theory of reasoning by case comparison. Dissertation Universiteit Maastricht, 2003.
28. G. Shafer. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1976.
29. L. Zadeh. Fuzzy Sets as the Basis for a Theory of Possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1:3-28, 1978.