A comparison of behavioral and constructivist interventions for increasing math-fact fluency in a second-grade classroom

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 917-930

  Poncy, Brian C ^a   McCallum, Elizabeth ^b   Schmitt, Ara J ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650489841     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20514     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bernstein, D. A., Penner, L. A., Clarke-Stewart, A., Roy, E. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2003). Psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
2. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practices (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The art of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
4. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Lee, K., & Pierce, T. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with mild-to-moderate mental retardation: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation, 39, 20-31.
5. Carnine, D., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E., & Tarver, S. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6. Cates, G. L., & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: A learning hierarchy perspective. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 23-34.
7. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
8. Delli Sante, A., McLaughlin, T. F., & Weber, K. P. (2001). The use and evaluation of a direct instruction flash card strategy on multiplication math facts mastery with two students with developmental disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 17(2), 68-75.
9. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23-40). Columbus OH: Merrill.
10. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (December 3, 2004). Pub. L. No.108-446, 108th Congress, 20 USC 1400.
11. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
12. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Sciences, 15, 661-667.
13. Lester, F. (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten-Grade 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
14. Leutzinger, L. (2002). Facts that last - subtraction: A balanced approach to memorization. Chicago, IL: Creative Publications.
15. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods and instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19.
16. McCallum, E., & Poncy, B. C. (in press). Math strategies: Enhancing basic math-fact fluency. In A. Canter, L. Paige, & S. Shaw (Eds.), Helping children at home and school: Handouts for families and educators (3rd ed).
17. McCallum, E., Skinner, C. H., Turner, H., & Saecker, L. (2006). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing multiplication fact fluency using a low-tech, classwide, time-delay intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 419-434.
18. Mokros, J., Russell, S. J., & Economopoulos, K. (1995). Beyond arithmetic. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.
19. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load in novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2009). Curriculum focal points for mathematics in pre-kindergarten through eighth grade. Retrieved September 3, 2009 from
21. National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP). (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
22. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 (January 8, 2002). Pub. L. No. 107-110. 107th Congress.
23. Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Jaspers, K. E. (2007). Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 27-37.
24. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Shulman, L., & Keisler, E. (Eds.). (1966). Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal. Chicago: Rand McNally.
26. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenburg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
27. Skinner, C. H. (2008). Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review, 37, 309-314.
28. Skinner, C. H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In T. S. Watson & F. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy: Ecological considerations in assessment, treatment, and evaluation (pp. 61-83). New York: Plenum.
29. Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., Williams, S., & Johns, G. A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54-64.
30. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Hennington, C. (1996). Increasing student learning rates by increasing student response rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313-325.
31. Skinner, C. H., McLaughlin, T. F., & Logan, P. (1997). Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 295-306.
32. Skinner, C. H., Pappas, D. N., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 389-404.
33. Skinner, C. H., & Shapiro, E. S. (1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123-133.
34. Skinner, C. H., & Smith, E. S. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-managed interventions for increasing academic performance. School Psychology Review, 21, 202-210.
35. Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K. L., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: An intervention for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 212-220.
36. Steffe, L., & Gale, J.Y (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334-341.