What drives the diffusion of inclusionary zoning?

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 578-602

  Meltzer, Rachel ^a   Schuetz, Jenny ^b  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650471077     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20510     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aiken, M., & Alford, R. R. (1970). Community structure and innovation: The case of public housing. The American Political Science Review, 64, 843-864.
2. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
4. Bajaj, V. (2008, October 16). Home prices seem far from bottom. New York Times, p. A1.
5. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371-400.
6. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395-416.
7. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1992). Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 715-742.
8. Bingham, R. D. (1978). Innovation, bureaucracy, & public policy: A study of innovation adoption by local government. The Western Political Quarterly, 31, 178-205.
9. Brueckner, J. K., & Saavedra, L. A. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54, 203-229.
10. Brueckner, J. (1998). Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 438-467.
11. Calavita, N., & Grimes, K. (1998). Inclusionary housing in California: The experience of two decades. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 150-170.
12. California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California. (2003). Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from.
13. California Coalition for Rural Housing (2007). California Inclusionary Housing Database. Retrieved October 9, 2007, from.
14. Clingermayer, J. C. (1993). Distributive politics, ward representation, and the spread of zoning. Public Choice, 77, 725-738.
15. Feiock, R. C. (2004). Politics, institutions, & local land-use regulation. Urban Studies, 41, 363-375.
16. Feiock, R. C., Lubell, M., & Jeong, M. G. (2003). The politics of local land use governance. Paper presented at the MPSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.
17. Feiock, R. C., & West, J. P. (1993). Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: Municipal solid waste recycling programs. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 399-419.
18. Ferreira, F., & Gyourko, J. (2007). Do political parties matter? Evidence from U.S. cities. NBER working paper #13535. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
19. Freeman, L. (2006). There goes the 'hood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20. Furman Center. (2008). Database of San Francisco-area affordable housing non-profits. New York University, Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy. Internal dataset.
21. Glickfeld, M., & Levine, N. (1992). Regional growth. local reaction: The enactment and effects of local growth control and management measures in California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
22. Goetz, E. G. (1993). Shelter burden: Local politics and progressive housing policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23. Goetz, E. G. (1994). Expanding possibilities in local development policies: An examination of U.S. cities. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 85-109.
24. Grambsch, P., & Therneau, T. (1994). Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika, 81, 515-526.
25. Gyourko, J., Saiz, A., & Summers, A. (2006). A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index. Working Paper. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School.
26. Hwang, S., & Gray, V. (1991). External limits and internal determinants of state public policy. The Western Political Quarterly, 44, 277-298.
27. Kessel, J. J. (1962). Governmental structure and political environment: A statistical note about American cities. The American Political Science Review, 56, 615-620.
28. Knaap, G., Bento, A., & Lowe, S. (2008). Housing market impacts of inclusionary zoning. College Park, MD: National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education.
29. Krutko, L. (2007). Memorandum to the Rules and Open Government Committee, City of San Jose. September 21 2007. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from.
30. Lohr, S. (2008, September 29). Opening step on long road. The New York Times.
31. Martin, I. (2001). Dawn of the living wage: The diffusion of a redistributive municipal policy. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 470-496.
32. Marwell, N. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review, 69, 265-291.
33. McDonald, J. F., & McMillen, D. P. (2004). Determinants of suburban development controls: A Fischel expedition. Urban Studies, 41, 341-361.
34. McNeal, R. S., Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & Dotterweich, L. J. (2003). Innovating in digital government in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 52-70.
35. Mollenkopf, J. (1983). The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309-332.
37. Mooney, C. Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on the state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 103-124.
38. Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. (1995). Legislative morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 599-627.
39. Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. (1999). The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 766-780.
40. Nocera, J. (2008a, September 16). On Wall Street as on Main Street, a problem of denial. New York Times, p. A25.
41. Nocera, J. (2008b, November 1). A rescue hindered by politics. New York Times, p. B1.
42. Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California. (2007). Affordable by choice: Trends in California inclusionary housing programs. San Francisco, CA: Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California. Retrieved October 9, 2007, from.
43. Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion reducing? Journal of Public Economics, 35, 333-354.
44. OFHEO. (2009). Housing price index, produced by Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from.
45. Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211-240.
46. Petersen, T. (1986). Estimating fully parametric hazard rate models with time-dependent covariates. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 219-246.
47. Petersen, T. (1991). Time aggregation bias in continuous-time hazard rate models. Sociological Methodology, 21, 263-290.
48. Petersen, T., & Koput, K. (1992). Time aggregation bias in hazard-rate models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 25-51.
49. Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2006). Do parties matter for economic outcomes? A regression-discontinuity approach. Working Paper. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from.
51. Quigley, J. M., & Raphael, S. (2004). Is housing unaffordable? Why isn't it more affordable? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 191-214.
52. Rusk, D. (2003). Classmates count. Executive summary. Retrieved October 9, 2007, from.
53. Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (in press). Silver bullet or Trojan horse? The impacts of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets. Urban Studies.
54. Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2009). 31 flavors of inclusionary zoning: Comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington DC and suburban Boston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75, 441-456.
55. Schuetz, J. (2008). Guarding the town walls: Motives and mechanisms for restricting multifamily housing in Massachusetts. Real Estate Economics, 36, 555-586.
56. Sherbert, E. (2007, November 14). Twilight zoning. MetroActive. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from.
57. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3-21.
58. Theriault, D. (2008, November 10). San Jose Council debates affordable housing plan. San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from.
59. University of California, Berkeley. (2008). Statewide database.
60. Vandell, K. D. (2003). Inclusionary zoning: Myths and realities. Working Paper. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Urban Land Economics Research.
61. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovation among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880-889.
62. Woolfolk, J. (2008, December 9). San Jose Council approves affordable housing plan. San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from.