31 flavors of inclusionary zoning: Comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC, and suburban Boston

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 441-456

  Schuetz, Jenny ^a,b   Meltzer, Rachel ^c   Been, Vicki ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c The Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

Affordable housing; Boston suburbs; Inclusionary zoning; San Francisco; Washington, DC

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; HOUSING MARKET; HOUSING POLICY; METROPOLITAN AREA; PRICE DETERMINATION; SUBURBAN AREA;

BOSTON; CALIFORNIA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; MASSACHUSETTS; NORTH AMERICA; SAN FRANCISCO; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA];

EID: 70350341689     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360903146806     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Affordable Dwelling Unit Enabling Act, Va. Code Ann. §15.2-2305 (2009).
2. American Planning Association. (2006). Model affordable housing density bonus ordinance. Retrieved August 25, 2008, from http://myapa.planning.org/smartgrowthcodes/phase1.htm
3. An act authorizing the City of Boston to limit buildings according to their use or construction to specified districts, (Ch. 665 of the Acts of 1956, amended 2001). Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://www.ci.boston.ma.us/bra/pdf/ZoningCode/Chapter665.pdf
4. Basolo, V., & Calavita, N. (2004). Policy claims with weak evidence: A critique of the Reason Foundation study on inclusionary housing in the San Francisco Bay Area. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine.
5. Board of Supervisors v. De Groff Enterprises, Inc., 198 S.E.2d 600 Va. (1973).
6. Boston Redevelopment Authority. (2006). Mayor Menino boosts affordable housing requirements. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.bostonredevelopmentauthority.org/press/PressDisplay.asp? pressID=306
7. Brown, K. D. (2001). Expanding affordable housing through inclusionary zoning: Lessons from the Washington metropolitan area. Washington, DC: Brookings Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
8. Calavita, N., & Grimes, K. (1998). Inclusionary housing in California: The experience of two decades. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 150-170.
9. Calavita, N., Grimes, K., & Mallach, A. (1997). Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative perspective. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 109-142.
10. California Coalition for Rural Housing. (2007). California inclusionary housing database. Retrieved July 23, 2007, from http://www.calruralhousing.org/housing-toolbox/ inclusionary-housing-policy-search
11. California Coalition for Rural Housing & Nonprofit Housing Association of Northern California. (2003). Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation. Retrieved July 15, 2007, from http://www.calruralhousing.org/publications/ 46-inclusionary-housing-in-ca-30-years-of-innovation
12. California Constitution, art. 11, §7. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_11
13. California Government Code, §65300, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
14. California Government Code, §65580, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
15. California Government Code, §65800, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
16. California Government Code, §65850, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
17. California Government Code, §65915, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
18. Coyle, T. (1991). Inclusionary zoning: Is it helping or hurting housing? Land Use Forum, 1(1), 27-28.
19. Dain, A. (2005). Residential land-use regulation in eastern Massachusetts: A study of 187 communities. Boston: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research.
20. Delaney, C. J., & Smith, M. T. (1989a). Impact fees and the price of new housing: An empirical study. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 17(1), 41-54.
21. Delaney, C. J., & Smith, M. T. (1989b). Pricing implications of development exactions on existing housing stock. Growth and Change 20(4), 1-12.
22. District of Columbia Code, §2-1002, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
23. District of Columbia Code, §6-641.01, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
24. District of Columbia Code, §6-641.02, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
25. District of Columbia Code, §6-641.05, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
26. Fox, R., & Rose, K. (2003). Expanding housing opprtunity in Washington, DC: The case for inclusionary zoning. Oakland, CA: PolicyLink.
27. Glaeser, E., Schuetz, J., & Ward, B. (2006). Regulation and the rise of housing price in Greater Boston. Cambridge, MA: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research.
28. Gyourko, J., Saiz, A., & Summers, A. (2006). A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index. Philadelphia: Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
29. Home Builders Association of Northern California v. City of Napa, 90 Cal. App. 4th 188 (2001).
30. Institute for Local Self Government. (2003). Annotated sample inclusionary housing ordinance. In California inclusionary housing reader (pp. 119-150). Retrieved August 23, 2008, from http://www.cacities.org/resource_files/7653.sample%20ordinance.pdf
31. Judd, R. A., & Rosen, D. P. (1992). Inclusionary housing in California: Creating affordability without public subsidy. American Bar Association Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 1(2), 4-7.
32. Knapp, G., Bento, A., & Lowe, S. (2008). Housing market impacts of inclusionary zoning. College Park, MD: National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education.
33. Mallach, A. (1984). Inclusionary housing programs: Policies and practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
34. Maryland Enabling Act, Md. Ann. Code. Art. 66B, §12.01 (2007). Massachusetts Constitutional Amendment, Art. LXXXIX, §§ 1-9. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://www.mass.gov/legis/const.htm
35. Massachusetts General Laws, ch. 40B, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
36. Massachusetts General Laws, ch. 40R, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
37. Massachusetts General Laws, ch. 40S, updated to include 2009 statutes. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://lexisnexis.com
38. Montgomery County's Affordable Housing Task Force. (2008). Report and recommendations. Retrieved on December 9, 2008, from http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/DHCA/community/ pdf/rr-ahtf.pdf
39. National Housing Council. (2002). Inclusionary zoning: Lessons learned in Massachusetts. National Housing Conference Affordable Housing Policy Review, 2(1): 1-48.
40. Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, California Coalition for Rural Housing, Sacramento Housing Alliance, & San Diego Housing Federation. (2007). Affordable by choice: Trends in California inclusionary housing programs. Retrieved on June 24, 2009, from http://www.nonprofithousing.org/pdf_pubs/SampleIHReport.pdf
41. Pendall, R. (2008a). From hurdles to bridges: Local land-use regulations and the pursuit of affordable rental housing. In N. Retsinas & E. Belsky (Eds.), Revisiting rental housing (pp. 225-276). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42. Pendall, R. (2008b). How might inclusionary zoning affect urban form? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Department of City and Regional Planning.
43. Powell, B., & Stringham, E. (2004a). Do affordable housing mandates work? Evidence from Los Angeles County and Orange County. (Policy Study No. 318). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
44. Powell, B., & Stringham, E. (2004b). Housing supply and affordability: Do affordable housing mandates work? (Policy Study No. 318). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
45. Ramos, J. R. (2009). Zoning and other land controls, 66 Cal. Jur. §33.
46. Rivinius, R. (1991). The case against inclusionary zoning. Land Use Forum, 1(1), 25-26.
47. Rusk, D. (2003). Table 1: List of IZ laws. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.gamaliel.org/DavidRusk/Table%201-list%20of% 20IZ%20laws.pdf
48. Rusk, D. (2005). Nine lessons for inclusionary zoning: Keynote remarks of David Rusk to the National Inclusionary Housing Conference Retrieved November 2, 2007, from http://www.gamaliel.org/DavidRusk/ keynote%2010-5-05.pdf
49. San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco, 41 P.3d 87 (Cal. 2002).
50. Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2007). The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets: Lessons from the San Francisco, Washington, DC, and suburban Boston areas. New York: Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University.
51. Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2008). Silver bullet or Trojan horse? The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets. New York: Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University.
52. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census of population and housing, Summary File 3 (SF3). Retrieved January 29, 2009, from http://factfinder.census.gov
53. U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). New residential construction series: Building permits. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/const/www/permitsindex.html
54. Vandell, K. D. (2003). Inclusionary zoning: Myths and realities Madison: Center for Urban Land Economics Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
55. Zoning Enabling Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 40A, §§ 1-17 (2003).