Teleportation-based realization of an optical quantum two-qubit entangling gate

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 49, 2010, Pages 20869-20874

  Gao, Wei Bo ^a   Goebel, Alexander M ^b   Lu, Chao Yang ^a   Dai, Han Ning ^a   Wagenknecht, Claudia ^b   Zhang, Qiang ^a   Zhao, Bo ^a   Peng, Cheng Zhi ^a   Chen, Zeng Bing ^a   Chen, Yu Ao ^a   Pan, Jian Wei ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERFEROMETER; OPTICS; PHYSICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNOLOGY; TELEPORTATION; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT;

EID: 78650457634     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005720107     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Knill E, Laflamme R, Milburn GJ (2001) A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409:46-52.
2. Gottesman D, Chuang IL (1999) Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations. Nature 402:390-393.
3. Bennett CH, et al. (1993) Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett 70:1895-1899.
4. Bouwmeester D, et al. (1997) Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390:575-579.
5. O'Brien JL, et al. (2003) Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate. Nature 426:264-267.
6. Gasparoni S, et al. (2004) Realization of a photonic controlled-NOT gate sufficient for quantum computation. Phys Rev Lett 93:020504.
7. Fiorentino M, Wong FNC (2004) Deterministic controlled-NOT gate for single-photon two-qubit quantum logic. Phys Rev Lett 93:070502.
8. Langford NK, et al. (2005) Demonstration of a simple entangling optical gate and its use in Bell-state analysis. Phys Rev Lett 95:210504.
9. Kiesel N, et al. (2005) Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple. Phys Rev Lett 95:210505.
10. Okamoto R, Hofmann HF, Takeuchi S, Sasaki K (2005) Demonstration of an optical quantum controlled-not gate without path interference. Phys Rev Lett 95:210506.
11. Vallone G, Pomarico E, De Martini F, Mataloni P (2008) Active one-way quantum computation with two-photon four-qubit cluster states. Phys Rev Lett 100:160502.
12. Lanyon BP, et al. (2009) Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Nat Phys 5:134-140.
13. Yoran N, Reznik B (2003) Deterministic linear optics quantum computation with single photon qubits. Phys Rev Lett 91:037903.
14. Nielsen MA (2004) Optical quantum computation using cluster states. Phys Rev Lett 93:040503.
15. Browne DE, Rudolph T (2005) Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation. Phys Rev Lett 95:010501.
16. Gilchrist A, Hayes AJF, Ralph TC (2005) Loss-tolerant optical qubits. Phys Rev Lett 95:100501.
17. Briegel HJ, Dür W, Cirac JI, Zoller P (1998) Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys Rev Lett 81:5932-5935.
18. Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H (2002) Quantum cryptography. Rev Mod Phys 74:145-195.
19. Nielsen MA (2003) Quantum computation by measurement and quantum memory. Phys Lett A 308:96-100.
20. Raussendorf R, Briegel HJ (2001) A one-way quantum computer. Phys Rev Lett 86:5188-5191.
21. Childs AM, Leung DW, Nielsen MA (2005) Unified derivations of measurement-based schemes for quantum computation. Phys Rev A 71:032318.
22. Verstraete F, Cirac JI (2004) Valence-bond states for quantum computation. Phys Rev A 70:060302.
23. Barenco A, et al. (1995) Elementary gates for quantum computation. Phys Rev A 52:3457-3467.
24. Kwiat PG (1997) Hyper-entangled states. J Mod Optic 44:2173-2184.
25. Hofmann HF (2005) Quantum parallelism of the controlled-NOT operation: An experimental criterion for the evaluation of device performance. Phys Rev A 72:022329.
26. Briegel HJ, Raussendorf R (2001) Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles. Phys Rev Lett 86:910-913.
27. Kwiat PG, et al. (1995) New high-intensity source of polarization- entangled photon pairs. Phys Rev Lett 75:4337-4341.
28. Zhang Q, et al. (2006) Experimental quantum teleportation of a two-qubit composite system. Nat Phys 2:678-682.
29. Lu C-Y, et al. (2007) Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nat Phys 3:91-95.
30. Hofmann HF, Takeuchi S (2002) Quantum phase gate for photonic qubits using only beam splitters and postselection. Phys Rev A 66:024308.
31. Kiesel N, et al. (2005) Experimental analysis of a four-qubit photon cluster state. Phys Rev Lett 95:210502.
32. Goebel AM, et al. (2008) Multistage entanglement swapping. Phys Rev Lett 101:080403.
33. Pan J-W, Zeilinger A (1998) Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-state analyzer. Phys Rev A 57:2208-2211.
34. Kok P, et al. (2007) Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev Mod Phys 79:135-174.
35. Gühne O, et al. (2002) Detection of entanglement with few local measurements. Phys Rev A 66:062305.
36. Tokunaga Y, Yamamoto T, Koashi M, Imoto N (2005) Simple experimental scheme of preparing a four-photon entangled state for the teleportation-based realization of a linear optical controlled-NOT gate. Phys Rev A 71:030301.
37. Mor T, Yoran N (2006) Methods for scalable optical quantum computation. Phys Rev Lett 97:090501.
38. Boschi D, Branca S, De Martini F, Hardy L, Popescu S (1998) Experimental realization of teleporting an unknown pure quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett 80:1121-1125.
39. Zukowski M, Zelinger A,Weinfurter H (1995) Entangling photons radiated by independent pulsed sources. Ann NY Acad Sci 755:91-102.
40. Tokunaga Y, Kuwashiro S, Yamamoto T, Koashi M, Imoto N (2008) Generation of highfidelity four-photon cluster state and quantum-domain demonstration of one-way quantum computing. Phys Rev Lett 100:210501.
41. Tóth G, Gühne O (2005) Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements. Phys Rev Lett 94:060501.
42. Nagata T, Okamoto R, O'Brien JL, Sasaki K, Takeuchi S (2007) Beating the standard quantum limit with four-entangled photons. Science 316:726-729. (Pubitemid 46717676)
43. Almeida MP, et al. (2007) Environment-induced sudden death of entanglement. Science 316:579-582.
44. Gao W-B, et al. (2010) Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nat Phys 6:331-335.
45. Hofmann HF (2005) Complementary classical fidelities as an efficient criterion for the evaluation of experimentally realized quantum operations. Phys Rev Lett 94:160504.
46. Prevedel R, et al. (2007) High-speed linear optics quantum computing using active feed-forward. Nature 445:65-69.
47. Varnava M, Browne DE, Rudolph T (2008) How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation? Phys Rev Lett 100:060502.
48. Wei Z-H, Han Y-J, Oh CH, Duan L-M (2010) Improving noise threshold for optical quantum computing with the EPR photon source. Phys Rev A 81:060301.
49. Politi A, Cryan MJ, Rarity JG, Yu SY, O'Brien JL (2008) Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science 320:646-649.
50. Matthews JCF, Politi A, Stefanov A, O'Brien JL (2009) Manipulating multi-photon entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits. Nat Photonics 3:346-350.