Rapid and targeted introgression of genes into popular wheat cultivars using marker-assisted background selection

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Randhawa, Harpinder S ^a   Mutti, Jasdeep S ^a   Kidwell, Kim ^a   Morris, Craig F ^a   Chen, Xianming ^a   Gill, Kulvinder S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME MARKER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVAR; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HOMOZYGOSITY; INTROGRESSION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; POPULATION SIZE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SEEDLING; WHEAT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME MAP; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT GENE; PROBABILITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

PUCCINIA STRIIFORMIS F. SP. TRITICI; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, PLANT; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANT DISEASES; PROBABILITY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; TRITICUM;

EID: 66749103783     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005752     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allard RW (1999) Principles of plant breeding. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. USA.
2. Young ND, Tanksley SD (1989) RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding. Theor Appl Genet 77: 353-359.
3. Tanksley SD, Young ND, Paterson AH, Bonierbale MW (1989) RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7: 257-264.
4. Ragot M, Biasiolli M, Delbut MF, Dell'Orco A, Malgarini L, et al. (1995) Marker-assisted backcrossing: a practical example. Techniques et utilisations des marqueurs moléculaires, Les Colloques, INRA, Paris 72: 45-56.
5. Prigge V, Maurer HP, Mackill DJ, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008) Comparison of the observed with the simulated distributions of the parental genome contribution in two marker-assisted backcross programs in rice. Theor Appl Genet 116: 739-744.
6. Hospital F (2001) Size of donor chromosome segments around introgressed loci and reduction of linkage drag in marker-assisted backcross programs. Genetics 158: 1363-1379.
7. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999) Comparison of Selection Strategies for Marker-Assisted Backcrossing of a Gene. Crop Sci 39: 1295-1301.
8. Sidhu D, Gill KS (2004) Distribution of genes and recombination in wheat and other eukaryotes. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 79: 257-270.
9. Erayman M, Sandhu D, Sidhu D, Dilbirligi M, Baenziger PS, et al. (2004) Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucl Acids Res 32: 3546-3565.
10. Hospital F, Decoux G (2002) Popmin: a program for the numerical optimization of population sizes in marker-assisted backcross programs. J Hered 93: 383-384.
11. Kidwell KK, Shelton GB, Demacon VL, Morris CF, Engle DA, et al. (2002) Registration of 'Zak' Wheat. Crop Science 42: 661a-662.
12. Grama A, Gerechter-Amitai ZK (1974) Inheritance of resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformmis) in crosses between wild emmer ( Triticum dicoccoides) and cultivated tetraploid and hexaploid wheat. Euphytica 23: 393-398.
13. Chen XM (2005) Epidemiology and control of stripe rust on wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 27: 314-337.
14. Chen XM, Line RF (1992) Identification of stripe rust resistance genes in wheat used to differentiate North American races of Puccinia striiformis. Phytopathology 82: 1428-1434.
15. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (2000) PLABSIM: Software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J Hered 91: 86-87.
16. Somers DJ, Isaac P, Edwards K (2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 109: 1105-1114.