Involving users in the design of a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation in breast cancer: Qualitative study

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Forbes, Lindsay J L ^a   Nicholls, Carol McNaughton ^b   Linsell, Louise ^a   Graham, Jenny ^b   Tompkins, Charlotte ^b   Ramirez, Amanda J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 78650413519     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-110     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient? I Chalmers, British Medical Journal 1995 310 1315 1318 7773050
2. Research governance framework for health and social care. Department of Health, London, Department of Health 2 2005
3. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. B Hanley A Truesdale A King D Elbourne I Chalmers, British Medical Journal 2001 322 519 523 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.519 11230065
4. Promoting early presentation of breast cancer: development of a psycho-educational intervention. CC Burgess AM Bish MS Hunter P Salkovskis M Michell P Whelehan, et al. Chronic Illness 2008 4 13 27 10.1177/1742395307084404 18322026
5. Promoting early presentation of breast cancer by older women: A preliminary evaluation of a one-to-one health professional-delivered intervention. CC Burgess L Linsell M Kapari L Omar M Michell P Whelehan, et al. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2009 5 377 387 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01. 005
6. A systematic review of the delay in diagnosis/treatment of symptomatic breast cancer. AM Westcombe MA Richards AJ Ramirez SB Love S Sutton C Burgess, et al. London, NHS Research and Development 1999
7. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. MA Richards AM Westcombe SB Love P Littlejohns AJ Ramirez, Lancet 1999 353 1119 1126 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02143-1 10209974
8. A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation of breast cancer in older women: effect on breast cancer awareness. L Linsell LJL Forbes C Burgess M Kapari L Omar L Tucker, et al. British Journal of Cancer 2009 101 40 s48 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605389 19956161
9. Cluster randomised trials: Methodological and ethical considerations. Medical Research Council, London, Medical Research Council 2002
10. Informed patient consent to participation in cluster randomized trials: an empirical exploration of trials in primary care. SM Eldridge D Ashby GS Feder, Clinical Trials 2005 2 91 98 10.1191/1740774505cn070oa 16279130
11. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. SJ Edwards DA Braunholtz RJ Lilford AJ Stevens, British Medical Journal 1999 318 1407 1409 10334756
12. Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. JH Scholefield S Moss F Sufi CM Mangham JD Hardcastle, Gut 2002 50 840 844 10.1136/gut.50.6.840 12010887
13. Carrying out qualitative analysis. J Ritchie L Spencer W O'Conner, Qualitative Research Practice London: Sage, Ritchie J, Lewis J, 2003
14. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. General Medical Council, London, General Medical Council 2008
15. Reference guide to consent for examination and treatment 2nd Edition. Department of Health, Gateway 11911 Central Office for Information 2009
16. A comparison of automated technology and manual cervical screening (MAVARIC) (Project Protocol). HC Kitchener S Moss H Cubie M Desai D Rana R Blanks, et al. National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment 2007
17. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies. C Junghans G Feder H Hemingway A Timmis M Jones, British Medical Journal 2005 331 940 10.1136/bmj.38583.625613.AE 16157604
18. Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Debriefing. JL Brody JP Gluck AS Aragon, Ethics & Behavior 2000 10 13 25
19. National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry. G Barrett JA Cassell JL Peacock MP Coleman CR National, British Medical Journal 2006 332 1068 1072 10.1136/bmj.38805. 473738.7C 16648132
20. Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. DJ Willison K Keshavjee K Nair C Goldsmith AM Holbrook, British Medical Journal 2003 326 373 10.1136/bmj.326.7385.373 12586673
21. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. EJ Robinson CE Kerr AJ Stevens RJ Lilford DA Braunholtz SJ Edwards, et al. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2005 9 1 192 15763039
22. Breast cancer incidence, stage, treatment and survival in ethnic groups in South East England. RH Jack EA Davies H Moller, British Journal of Cancer 2009 100 545 550 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604852 19127253
23. What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke. K Ali C Roffe P Crome, Stroke 2006 37 865 871 10.1161/01.STR.0000204053.36966.80 16456122
24. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: consumer involvement in design of new randomised controlled trial. L Koops RI Lindley, British Medical Journal 2002 325 415 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.415 12193356
25. Involving communities in the design of clinical trial protocols: the BAN Study in Lilongwe, Malawi. AL Corneli EG Piwoz ME Bentley A Moses JR Nkhoma BC Tohill, et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2007 28 59 67 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08. 003 17000137