The absence of non-western IR theory in Asia reconsidered

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-23

  Chen, Ching Chang ^a  

^a RITSUMEIKAN ASIA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650391214     PISSN: 1470482X     EISSN: 14704838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/irap/lcq014     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (2007a) 'Preface: why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from Asia', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 285-286.
2. Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (2007b) 'Conclusion: on the possibility of a non-Western IR theory in Asia', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 427-438.
3. Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (2007c) 'Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 287-312.
4. Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (eds) (2010) Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. London: Routledge.
5. Alatas, S.F. (2006) Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi: Sage.
6. Almond, G.A. and Powell, G.B., Jr. (1978) Comparative Politics: Systems, Processes, and Policy, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
7. Aydin, C. (2007) The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Bau, T.H., Wu, Y.S. and Kao, L. et al. (1999) Zhengbianzhong de liangan guanxi lilun [Contending Approaches to Cross-Strait Relations]. Taipei: Wunan.
9. Behera, N.C. (2007) 'Re-imagining IR in India', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 341-368.
10. Bhaba, H. (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
11. Bilgin, P. (2008) 'Thinking past "Western" IR?', Third World Quarterly, 29, 5-23.
12. Booth, K. (1979) Strategy and Ethnocentrism. New York: Holmes & Meier.
13. Calichman, R.F. (ed.) (2008) Overcoming Modernity: Cultural Identity in Wartime Japan. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Callahan, W.A. (2008) 'Chinese visions of world order: post-hegemonic or a new hegemony?', International Studies Review, 10, 749-761.
15. Chakrabarty, D. (2000a) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Chakrabarty, D. (2000b) 'Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: who speaks for "Indian" pasts?', in D. Brydon (ed.), Postcolonialism: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies, Vol. IV, pp. 1491-1518. London: Routledge.
17. Chan, S. and Moore, C. (eds) (2009) Approaches to International Relations, Vol. IV. London: Sage.
18. Chan, S., Mandaville, P.G. and Bleiker, R. (eds) (2001) The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West. New York: Palgrave.
19. Chatterjee, P. (1986) Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Chen, C.C. (2009) 'When is China's military modernization dangerous? Constructing the cross-strait offense-defense balance and U.S. arms sales to Taiwan', Issues and Studies, 45(3), 69-119.
21. Chen, J. (2002) Foreign Policy of the New Taiwan: Pragmatic Diplomacy in Southeast Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22. Chen, K.H. (2006) Qu diguo: Yazhou zuowei fangfa [Toward De-Imperialisation: Asia as Method]. Taipei: Xingren.
23. Chen, B., Hwang, C.C. and Ling, L.H.M. (2009) 'Lust/caution in IR: democratising world politics with culture as a method', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37, 743-766.
24. Choi, J.K. (2008) 'Theorizing East Asian International Relations in Korea', Asian Perspective, 32, 193-216.
25. Chong, A. (2007) 'Southeast Asia: theory between modernization and tradition', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 391-425.
26. Cox, R.W. (1983) 'Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method', Millennium: A Journal of International Studies, 12, 162-175.
27. Cox, R.W. (1986) 'Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory', in R.O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, pp. 204-254. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Crawford, R.M.A. and Jarvis, D.S.L. (eds) (2001) International Relations-Still An American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought. Alybany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29. Cummings, B. (1997) 'Boundary displacement: area studies and international studies during and after the cold war', Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 29, 6-27.
30. Galtung, J. (1971) 'A structural theory of imperialism', Journal of Peace Research, 8, 81-117.
31. Hobson, J.M. (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Hoffman, S. (1977) 'An American social science-international relations', Daedalus, 106, 68-82.
33. Huntington, S.P. (1993) 'The clash of civilizations?', Foreign Affairs, 72, 22-49.
34. Ikeda, J. (2008) 'Japanese vision of international society: a historical exploration', in K. Shimizu et al. (ed.), Is There a Japanese IR? Seeking an Academic Bridge through Japan's History of International Relations, pp. 5-28. Otsu: Ryukoku University (Afrasian Centre for Peace and Development Studies Research Series).
35. Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D.L. (2004) International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge.
36. Inoguchi, T. (2007) 'Are there any theories of international relations in Japan?', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 369-390.
37. Inoguchi, T. (2009) 'Japan, Korea, and Taiwan: are one hundred flowers about to blossom?', in A.B. Tickner and O. Wæver (eds), International Relations Scholarship Around the World, pp. 86-102. London: Routledge.
38. Jansen, M.B. (1984) 'Japanese imperialism: late Meiji perspectives', in R.H. Myers and M.P. Peattie (eds), The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895-1945, pp. 61-79. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Jones, B.G. (ed.) (2006) Decolonizing International Relations. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
40. Kim, H.K. and Cho, Y.Y. (2009) 'International relations studies in Korea: retrospects and prospects', Pacific Focus, 24, 402-421.
41. Kim, M. and Hodges, H.J. (2005) 'On Huntington's civilizational paradigm: a reappraisal', Issues and Studies, 41(2), 217-248.
42. Ling, L.H.M. (2002) Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Mizoguchi, Y. (1989) Hô hô to shite no Chû goku [China as Method]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.
44. Peattie, M.P. (1984) 'Japanese attitudes towards colonialism', in R.H. Myers and M.P. Peattie (eds), The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895-1945, pp. 80-127. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Peattie, M.P. (1996) 'Nanshin: the "Southward Advance", 1931-1941, as a prelude to the Japanese occupation of Southeast Asia', in P. Duus, R.H. Myers and M.P. Peattie (eds), The Japanese Wartime Empire, 1931-1945, pp. 189-242. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Qin, Y. (2006) Guoji guanxi lilun Zhongguo pai shengcheng de keneng he biran [The Chinese School of International Relations Theory: Possibility and Necessity], Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi, 3, 7-13.
47. Qin, Y. (2007) 'Why is there no Chinese international relations theory?', International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 313-340.
48. Said, E.W. (1993) Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
49. Salter, M.B. (2002) Barbarians and Civilization in International Relations. London: Pluto Press.
50. Schedler, A., Diamond, L. and Plattner, M.F. (eds) (1999) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
51. Shani, G. (2008) 'Toward a post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory', International Studies Review, 10, 722-734.
52. Shih, C.Y. (2007a) 'Constituting Taiwanese statehood: the world timing of un-Chinese consciousness', Journal of Contemporary China, 16, 699-716.
53. Shih, C.Y. (2007b) Democracy (Made in Taiwan): The 'Success' State as a Political Theory. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
54. Shih, C.Y. (2008) 'The time-honored peace maker for East Asia: a subaltern Taiwan's re-appropriation of colonial narratives', in I. Yuan (ed.), Cross-Strait at the Turning Point: Institution, Identity and Democracy, pp. 349-371. Taipei: Institute of International Relations.
55. Shih, C.Y. (2010) 'The self that has no other: conversion, responsibility, resistance, transcendence, and Asianism', paper presented at the Conference on 'Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention in the International Society of East Asia', Leiden University College, The Hague, Netherlands, 11-12 June.
56. Shimizu, K. (2008) 'Culture and international relations: why does Japan's IR focus on the third dimension?', in K. Shimizu et al. (eds), Is There a Japanese IR? Seeking an Academic Bridge through Japan's History of International Relations, pp. 69-83. Otsu: Ryukoku University (Afrasian Centre for Peace and Development Studies Research Series).
57. Shimizu, K. (2010) 'Why were Japanese "postmodernists" involved in the wartime regime? Lessons from the Kyoto School's theory of world history', in N. Nagasaki et al. (eds), Conflict Resolution in the Afrasian Context: Examining more Inclusive Approaches, pp. 19-28. Otsu: Ryukoku University (Afrasian Centre for Peace and Development Studies Research Series).
58. Smith, S. (2002) 'The United States and the discipline of international relations: "hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline" ', International Studies Review, 4, 67-85.
59. Snyder, J. (2008) 'Some good and bad reasons for a distinctively Chinese approach to international relations theory', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, USA, 28-31 August.
60. Song, X. (2001) 'Building international relations theory with Chinese characteristics', Journal of Contemporary China, 10, 61-74.
61. Spivak, G.C. (1988) 'Can the subaltern speak?', in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, pp. 217-313. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
62. Suzuki, S. (2009) Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with European International Society. London: Routledge.
63. Takeuchi, Y. (2005) What Is Modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi, translated by Richard Calichman. New York: Columbia University Press.
64. Tickner, A.B. and Wæver, O. (eds) (2009) International Relations Scholarship Around the World. London: Routledge.
65. Tosa, H. (2009) 'Rethinking the project of overcoming the Western "universalism": a Hegelian trap?', paper presented at the Symposium on 'Democratizing International Relations: New Thinking, Doing and Being for a New Century', National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 11-12 March.
66. Wæver, O. (1998) 'The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations', International Organization, 52, 687-727.
67. Wang, Y. (2009) 'China: between copying and constructing', in A.B. Tickner and O. Wæver (eds), International Relations Scholarship Around the World, pp. 103-119. London: Routledge.
68. Weber, C. (2005) International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
69. Xiao, R. (2010) 'The international relations theoretical discourse in China: one world, different explanations', Journal of Chinese Political Science, 15, 99-116.
70. Zhao, T. (2005) Tianxia tixi: Shijie zhidu zhexue daolun [The Tianxia System: A Philosophy for the World Institution]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
71. Zheng, Y. (1999) Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.