Selection of project delivery method in transit: Drivers and objectives

Journal of Management in Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-27

  Touran, Ali ^a   Gransberg, Douglas D ^b   Molenaar, Keith R ^c   Ghavamifar, Kamran ^a  

^a Northeastern University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost growth; Project delivery method; Risk analysis; Schedule compression; Structured interview

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSIVE SCHEDULE; ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS; CASE STUDY ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCTION MANAGER; CROSS SECTION; DELIVERY METHODS; DESIGN/BUILD; INFLUENTIAL FACTORS; PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD; PROJECT DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; SCHEDULE COMPRESSION; SELECTION DECISIONS; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TRANSIT AGENCIES; TRANSIT PROJECTS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SITE SELECTION;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 78650388363     PISSN: 0742597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000027     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (2005). Managing capital costs of major federally funded public transportation projects, Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), Washington, D.C.
2. Construction Industry Institute. (1997). " Project delivery systems: CM at risk, design-build, design-bid-build. " Research Summary RS 133-1, Austin, Tex.
3. Debella, D. C., and Ries, R. (2006). " Construction delivery systems: A comparative analysis of their performance within school districts." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 0733-9364, 132 (11), 1131-1138.
4. El Wardani, M., Messner, J., and Horman, M. (2006). " Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 0733-9364, 132 (3), 230-238. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(230) (Pubitemid 43260123)
5. Ginzberg, M. J. (1978). " Redesign of managerial tasks: A requisite for successful decision support systems." MIS Q. 0276-7783, 2 (1), 39-52. 10.2307/249105
6. Gordon, C. M. (1994). " Choosing appropriate construction contracting method." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 0733-9364, 120 (1), 196-210. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:1(196)
7. Graham, P. (2001). Evaluation of design-build practice in Colorado IR(CX) 70-4 (143), Colorado DOT, Denver.
8. Ibbs, C. W., Kwak, Y., and Odabasi, A. (2003). " Project delivery system and project change: A quantitative analysis." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 0733-9364, 129 (4), 382-387. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(382) (Pubitemid 40265451)
9. Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). " Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 0733-9364, 124 (6), 435-444. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435)
10. Mahdi, I. M., and Alreshaid, K. (2005). " Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process." Int. J. Proj. Manage. 0263-7863, 23, 564-572. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.007 (Pubitemid 41600529)
11. Mitchell, B. P. (1999). " The applicability of the Spearin doctrine: Do owners warrant plans and specifications? " Find Law for Legal Professionals, 〈 http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Aug/1/128038.html 〉 (March 24, 2007).
12. Oyetunji, A. A., and Anderson, S. D. (2006). " Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 0733-9364, 132 (1), 3-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:1(3)
13. Phillips, L. (1984). " A theory of requisite decision models." Acta Psychol. 0001-6918, 56, 29-48. 10.1016/0001-6918(84)90005-2
14. Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1996). " Selecting design-build: Public and private sector owner attitude." J. Manage. Eng. 0742-597X, 12 (6), 47-53. 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:6(47)
15. Touran, A., Gransberg, D., Molenaar, K. R., Ghavamifar, K., Mason, D. J., and Fithian, L. (2009). " Evaluation of project delivery methods." TCRP Web-Document 41, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
16. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.