Using WebCT as a Supplemental Tool to Enhance Critical Thinking and Engagement among Developmental Reading Students

Journal of College Reading and Learning

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 9-33

  Burgess, Melissa L ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650364356     PISSN: 10790195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10790195.2009.10850316     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ackley, K., (2001). Essays from contemporary culture (4th ed.). Boston:Heinle & Heinle/Thomson Learning.
2. Beeghly, D., (2005). It's about time:Using electronic literature discussion groups with adult learners [Electronic version]. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(1), 23–30.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M., (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B., Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
4. Boylan, H., (2002). What Works:Research-Based Practices in Developmental Education. Boone, NC:Continuous Quality Improvement Network/National Center for Developmental Education, Appalachian State University.
5. Burgess, M. L., (2006). [Journal entry in developmental studies classroom]. Unpublished raw data.
6. Burgess, M. L., (2007). [Journal entry in developmental studies classroom]. Unpublished raw data.
7. Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., & Radcliffe, R., (2004). The effectiveness of strategic reading instruction for college developmental readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(1), 25–46.
8. Caverly, D. C., & Peterson, C., (2005). Techtalk:Building academic literacy through online discussion forums [Electronic version]. Journal of Developmental Education, 29(2), 38–39.
9. Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J., (2004). Engaging the online learner. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
10. Cox, S. R., Friesner, D., & Khayum, M., (2003). Do reading skills courses help underprepared readers achieve academic success in college? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 170–196.
11. D'Eca, T., (2003). The Use of Chat in EFL/ESL. Retrieved January 3, 2007 from Berkeley University, TESL-EJ:Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language Web site:www.writing.berkeley.edu.
12. Eble, K., (1994). Craft of teaching:A guide to mastering the professor's art (2nd edition), New York:Jossey-Bass.
13. Elder, L., & Paul, R., (2004). Critical thinking…and the art of close reading, part IV. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), pp. 36–37.
14. Flippo, R. F., (2001). Reading researchers in search of common ground. Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
15. Frederickson, E., Pickett, A., & Shea, P., (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses:Principles and examples from the SUNY Learning Network [Electronic version]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2).
16. Fry, V., & Ecung, A., (1998). Views and processes for integrating reading and writing for successful developmental practice. [Electronic version]. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.nade.net/documents/Mono98/mono98.4.pdf.
17. Gambrell, L., (2006). Technology and the engaged literacy learner. In M. C., McKenna, L. D., Labbo, R. D., Kieffer, & D., Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 289–294). Mahweh, NJ:Erlbaum.
18. Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R., (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(10). Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
19. Hasselbring, T. S., Lott, A. C., & Zydney, J. M., (2004). A review of technology-based approaches for reading instruction. [Electronic version]. Tools for researchers and vendors. WashingtonDC:American Institutes for Research.
20. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V., (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A., Renninger, S., Hidi, & A., Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
21. Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J., (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/vol3num2/Johnston%20-%20Printer%20Version.pdf.
22. Krech, P., (2001). Developing writers using technology. 2001:A Developmental Odyssey. (Monograph) Warrensburg, MO:NADE.
23. Lavin, D., & Hyllegard, D., (1996). Changing the odds:Open admissions and the life changes of the disadvantaged [Electronic version]. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
24. Lee, K., (2007). Online collaborative case study learning. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 82–100.
25. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Commack, D. W., (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B., Ruddell & N.J., Unrou (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes in Reading (pp. 1570–1607). NewarkDE:International Reading Association.
26. Ley, K., & Young, D. B., (1998). Motivation in developmental and regular admission college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 14(2), 29–39.
27. Lindsey-North, J. L., (2000). Incorporating a course website into teaching:A promising practice especially for teacher education. (Report no. SP039547). Place of pub.:Wright State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447077).
28. Lowery, B. R., & Young, D. B., (1992). Designing motivational instruction for developmental education. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 9(1), 29–44.
29. Martyn, M., (2003). The hybrid online model. Good practice [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 1, 18–23.
30. McCabe, R. H., & Day, P. R., Jr. (1998). Developmental education:A twenty-first century social and economic imperative. Mission Viejo, CA:League for Innovation in the Community College, The College Board.
31. Moore, R., (2007). Academic motivation and performance of developmental education biology students. Journal of Developmental Education, 31(1), 24–34.
32. NADE. (2007). Definition of developmental education. Retrieved January 31, 2008, from http://www.nade.net.
33. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCDE). (2003). Remedial education at higher institutions in fall 2000 (Report No. NCES 97–584). WashingtonD.C.:NCDE.
34. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G., (2002). Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. Research in the Schools, 9(1), 73–90.
35. Osterman, P. P., (2005). A comparison of student performance in developmental reading using traditional versus a hybrid model of traditional and online instruction. Research in Developmental Education, 19(2), 1–6.
36. Pallof, R., & Pratt, K., (2003). The virtual student:A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
37. Perin, D., (2005). Institutional decision making for increasing academic preparedness in community colleges. New Direction for Community Colleges, 129, 27–38.
38. Perkins, C., & Murphy, E., (2006). Identifying and measuring individual engagement in critical thinking in online discussions:An exploratory case study. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 298–307.
39. Petrides, L., Kerglani, A., & Nguyen, L., (2006). Basic Online Education Literature. League for the Innovation in Community College. Retrieved on December 12, 2007, from http://www.league.org/league/projects/beo/files/Literature_Review.pdf.
40. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T., (1994). Self-Regulated learning in college students:Knowledge, strategies and motivation. In P. R., Pintrich & D. R., Brown (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition and learning:Essays in honor of Wilbur J. McKeachie (pp.113–133). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
41. Quitadamo, I. J., & Brown, A., (2001). Effective teaching styles and instructional design for online learning environments. National Educational Computing Conference Chicago, IL.
42. Richmond, V., (1990). Communication in the classroom [Electronic version]. Communication Education, 39, 183–196.
43. Roberson, T., & Klotz, J., (2001, November). Chat:The missing link in on-line instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, AR.
44. Saxon, D., & Boylan, H., (2004). Characteristics of Community College Remedial Students. From http://www.ncde.appstate.edu/.
45. Scriven, M., & Paul, R., (2004, Month day). Defining critical thinking. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/.
46. Smith, G., Ferguson, D., & Caris, M., (2001). Teaching college courses online vs. face-to-face. THE Journal, 28(9), 18–26.
47. Testa, A., (2000). Seven principles for good practice in teaching and technology. In R. A., Cole (Ed.), Issues in Web-Based pedagogy (pp. 238–243). Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.
48. Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer. (2008, June 19). Texas population estimates program., San Antonio, TX:Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer, Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research, the University of Texas at San Antonio. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://txsdc.utsa.edu/tpepp/txpopest.php.
49. Tu, C. H., & Corry, M., (2003). Designs, management tactics, and strategies in asynchronous learning discussions [Electronic version]. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 303–315.
50. Wadsworth, L., (2007). Online mathematics achievement:Effects of learning strategies and self-efficacy. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(3), 6–14.
51. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J., (2005, Month). Understanding by design 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.