Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship Part 2: Subjective approaches

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 479-483

  Greenhalgh, Trisha ^a   Heath, Iona ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 78650362296     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2010.043372     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Greenhalgh T, Heath I. Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship. Part I: 'Hard' approaches (surveys and interaction assessment). Quality and Safety in Health Care 2010;19:475-8.
2. Greenhalgh T, Heath I. Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship. London: Kings Fund, 2010.
3. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:417-30.
4. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
5. Greenhalgh T, Potts H, Wong G, et al. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q 2009;87:729-88.
6. Lincoln YS. Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln YS, eds. The qualitative inquiry reader. London: Sage, 2002.
7. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. London: Routledge, 1956.
8. Rogers C. Client-centered therapy: Its practice, implications and theory. Philadelphia: Trans-Atlantic Publications, 1951.
9. Charon R. Narrative medicine: Form, function, and ethics. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:83-7.
10. Frank A. Just listening: Narrative and deep illness. Families, Systems and Health 1998;16:197-216.
11. Greenhalgh T, Robb N, Scambler G. Communicative and strategic action in interpreted consultations in primary health care: A Habermasian perspective. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1170-87.
12. Robb N, Greenhalgh T. "You have to cover up the words of the doctor": The mediation of trust in interpreted consultations in primary care. J Health Organ Manag 2006;20:434-55.
13. Mol A. The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge, 2008.
14. Freud S. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanlaysis. London: Penguin, 1973.
15. Horvath AO. The therapeutic relationship: From transference to alliance. J Clin Psychol 2000;56:163-73.
16. Blow AJ, Sprenkle DH, Davis SD. Is who delivers the treatment more important than the treatment itself? The role of the therapist in common factors. J Marital Fam Ther 2007;33:298-317.
17. Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Malcolm Heath. London: Penguin, 1996.
18. Strauss AL. Chronic illness and the quality of life. St Louis: Mosby, 1975.
19. Bakhtin M. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
20. Launer J. Narrative based primary care: A practical guide. Oxford: Radcliffe, 2002.
21. Buber M. Between man and man. London: Routledge, 1947.
22. Jodalen H, Vetlesen AJ. Closeness: An ethics. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1997.
23. Nessa J. Autonomy and dialogue: About the doctor-patient relationship. In: Thomasma DC, Weisstub DN, Hervé C, eds. Personhood and health care. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001:355-62.
24. Mathews JJ. The communication process in clinical settings. Soc Sci Med 1983;17:1371-8.
25. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon, 1987.
26. Scambler G, Britten N. System, lifeworld, and doctor-patient interaction. In: Scambler G, ed. Habermas critical theory and health. London: Routledge, 2001.
27. Scambler G. Habermas, critical theory and health. London: Routledge, 2001.
28. Roberts C, Sarangi S. Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ 2005;39:632-40.
29. Mishler EG. The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.
30. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, et al. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: Qualitative study. BMJ 2000;320:1246-50.
31. Barry CA, Stevenson FA, Britten N, et al. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:487-505.
32. Greener I. Patient choice in the NHS: The view from economic sociology. Social Theory and Health 2003;1:72-89.
33. Department of Health. Better information, better choices, better health: Putting information at the centre of health. London: The Stationery Office, 2004.
34. Latour B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
35. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Bower P. Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:179.
36. McKinstry B, Ashcroft RE, Car J, et al. Interventions for improving patients' trust in doctors and groups of doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3): CD004134.
37. Roberts C, Wass V, Jones R, et al. A discourse analysis study of 'good' and 'poor' communication in an OSCE: A proposed new framework for teaching students. Med Educ 2003;37:192-201.
38. Roberts C, Sarangi S, Southgate L, et al. Oral examinations-equal opportunities, ethnicity, and fairness in the MRCGP. BMJ 2000;320:370-5.
39. Gerard K, Salisbury C, Street D, et al. Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008;13(Suppl 2):3-10.
40. Roland M, Mayor V, Morris R. Factors associated with achieving continuity of care in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1986;36:102-4.
41. Baker R, Streatfield J. What kind of general practice do patients prefer? Exploration of practice characteristics associated with patient satisfaction. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:693-710.