Aquatic pollution increases the relative success of invasive species

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 165-176

  Crooks, Jeffrey A ^a,b   Chang, Andrew L ^b,c   Ruiz, Gregory M ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diversity; Fouling; Habitat; Invasibility; Invasions; Propagule pressure

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FIELDWORK; FOULING; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVERTEBRATE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NATIVE SPECIES; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; VULNERABILITY; WATER POLLUTION;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 78650310782     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9799-3     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6: 506-519.
2. Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77: 776-790.
3. Byers JE (2002) Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97: 449-458.
4. Carlton JT (1979) History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and estuarine invertebrates of the Pacific coast of North America. Ph. D Thesis. University of California, Davis.
5. Carlton JT (1996) Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77: 1653-1655.
6. Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová I, Tichý L, Danihelka J (2008) Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89: 1541-1553.
7. Clark GF, Johnston EL (2005) Manipulating larval supply in the field: a controlled study of marine invasibility. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 289: 9-19.
8. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth.
9. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth.
10. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Sea Grant College Program (Connecticut Sea Grant).
11. Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8: 1023-1037.
12. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302-1310.
13. Crooks JA, Suarez A (2006) Hyperconnectivity, invasive species, and the global breakdown of natural barriers to dispersal. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA (eds) Connectivity conservation: Maintaining connections for nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 451-578.
14. Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115: 451-462.
15. D'Antonio CM, Dudley TL, Mack M (1999) Disturbance and biological invasions: direct effects and feedbacks. In: Walker L (ed) Ecosystems of disturbed grounds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 413-451.
16. Dafforn KA, Glasby TM, Johnston EL (2009) Links between estuarine condition and spatial distributions of marine invaders. Divers Distrib 15: 807-821.
17. Davies KF, Chesson P, Harrison S, Inouye BD, Melbourne BA, Rice KJ (2005) Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 86: 1602-1610.
18. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thomson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 86: 1602-1610.
19. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Wiley, New York.
20. Fine PVA (2002) The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. J Trop Ecol 18: 687-705.
21. Floerl O, Pool TK, Inglis GJ (2004) Positive interactions between nonindigenous species facilitate transport by human vectors. Ecol Appl 14: 1724-1736.
22. Foster BL, Smith VH, Dickson TL, Hildebrand T (2002) Invasibility and compositional stability in a grassland community: relationships to diversity and extrinsic factors. Oikos 99: 300-307.
23. Gelbard JL, Belnap J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol 17: 420-432.
24. Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242: 344-347.
25. Hobbs RJ, Atkins L (1988) Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australia wheatbelt. Aust J Ecol 13: 171-179.
26. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6: 324-337.
27. Johnston EL, Piola RF, Clark GF (2009) The role of propagule pressure in invasion success. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions of marine ecosystems: ecological, management and geographic perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 133-151.
28. Knight KS, Reich PB (2005) Opposite relationships between invasibility and native species richness at patch versus landscape scales. Oikos 109: 81-88.
29. Kowarik I (1995) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions-General aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 85-103.
30. Levine JM, D'Antonio CM (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15-26.
31. Levine JM, D'Antonio CM (2003) Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol 17: 322-326.
32. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 223-228.
33. Lohrer AM, Chiaroni LD, Hewitt JE, Thrush SF (2008) Biogenic disturbance determines invasion success in a subtidal soft-sediment system. Ecology 89: 1299-1307.
34. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522-1536.
35. Lozon J, MacIsaac H (1997) Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ Rev 5: 131-144.
36. Mead R (1988) The design of experiments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Meiners SJ, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2002) Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field successions: community patterns and associations. Ecography 25: 215-223.
38. Menke SB, Holway DA (2006) Abiotic factors control invasion by Argentine ants at the community scale. J Anim Ecol 75: 368-376.
39. Olyarnik SV, Bracken MES, Byrnes JE, Hughes AR, Hultgren KM, Stachowicz JJ (2009) Ecological factors affecting community invasibility. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions of marine ecosystems: ecological, management, and geographic perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 587-617.
40. Petryna L, Moora M, Nunes CO, Cantero JJ, Zobel M (2002) Are invaders disturbance limited? Conservation of mountain grasslands in Central Argentina. Appl Veg Sci 5: 195-202.
41. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2006a) Differential resistance to extended copper exposure in four introduced bryozoans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311: 103-114.
42. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2006b) Differential tolerance to metals among populations of the introduced bryozoan Bugula neritina. Mar Biol 148: 997-1010.
43. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2008) Pollution reduces native diversity and increases invader dominance in marine hard-substrate communities. Divers Distrib 14: 329-342.
44. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2009) Comparing differential tolerance of native and non-indigenous marine specis to metal pollution using novel assay techniques. Environ Pollut 157: 2853-2864.
45. Preisler RK, Wasson K, Wolff W, Tyrrell MC (2009) Invasions of estuaries versus the adjacent open coast: a global perspective. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Ecological, management, and geographic perspectives. Springer, Heidelbderg.
46. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31: 481-531.
47. Sax DF, Brown JH (2000) The paradox of invasion. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 9: 363-371.
48. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 170-176.
49. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (1999) Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286: 1577-1579.
50. Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83: 2575-2590.
51. Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79: 2041-2056.
52. Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, McKenzie WJ, Kuris AM (2003) Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421: 628-630.
53. Tyser RW, Worley CA (1992) Alien flora in grasslands along road and trail corridors in Glacier National Park, USA. Conserv Biol 6: 253-262.
54. Veltman CJ, Nee S, Crawley M (1996) Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. Am Nat 147: 542-557.
55. Von Holle B (2005) Biotic resistance to invader establishment of a southern Appalachian plant community is determined by environmental conditions. J Ecol 93: 16-26.
56. Woitke M, Dietz H (2002) Shifts in dominance of native and invasive plants in experimental vegetation. Perspect Plant Ecol Syst Evol 5: 165-184.