Theoretical enzyme design using the Kepler scientific workflows on the Grid

Procedia Computer Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1175-1184

  Wang, Jianwu ^a   Korambath, Prakashan ^b   Kim, Seonah ^b   Johnson, Scott ^b   Jin, Kejian ^b   Crawl, Daniel ^a   Altintas, Ilkay ^a   Smallen, Shava ^a   Labate, Bill ^b   Houk, Kendall N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational chemistry; Enzyme design; Grid computing; Parallelism; Pipeline; Scientific workflow

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; DESIGN; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENZYMES; FAULT TOLERANCE; PIPELINES;

COMPUTATIONAL POWER; COMPUTATIONAL PROCESS; DESIGN PROCESS; EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS; PARALLELISM; RESOURCE CONSOLIDATION; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; TASK PARALLELISM;

GRID COMPUTING;

EID: 78650269604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770509     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.04.131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. D.J. Tantillo, J. Chen, and K.N. Houk, Theozymes and compuzymes: theoretical models for biological catalysis. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 1998. 2(6): pp. 743-50.
2. I. Foster and C. Kesselman, Computational Grids. In I. Foster and C. Kesselman, eds., The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, Morgan Kaufman (1999), pp. 15-51.
3. W. Sudholt, I. Altintas and K. Baldridge, Scientific Workflow Infrastructure for Computational Chemistry on the Grid. In Proceedings of the 1st Computational Chemistry and Its Applications Workshop at the 6th International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS 2006). LNCS 3993, pp. 69-76. 2006.
4. A. Tiwari and A.K. T. Sekhar, Workflow based framework for life science informatics. Computational Biology and Chemistry 31(5-6), pp. 305-319. 2007.
5. J. Yu and R. Buyya. A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid Computing. J. Grid Computing, 2006 (3), pp.171-200.
6. K.K. Baldridge, J.P. Greenberg, W. Sudholt, S. Mock, I. Altintas, C. Amoreira, Y. Potier, A. Birnbaum, K. Bhatia, M. Taufer, The Computational Chemistry Prototyping Environment, Proceedings of the IEEE, 93 (2005), pp. 510-521.
7. K.K. Baldridge, W. Sudholt, J.P. Greenberg, C. Amoreira, Y. Potier, I. Altintas, A. Birnbaum, D. Abramson, C. Enticott, S. Garic, Cluster and Grid Infrastructure for Computational Chemistry and Biochemistry. In A.Y. Zomaya, ed., Parallel Computing for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Wiley (2005), pp. 533-552.
8. X. Zhang and K.N. Houk, Why enzymes are proficient catalysts: beyond the Pauling paradigm. Acc Chem Res, 2005. 38(5): pp. 379-385.
9. S.J. Benkovic and S. Hammes-Schiffer, A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science, 2003. 301(5637): pp. 1196-1202.
10. M. Garcia-Viloca, J. Gao, M. Karplus, D.G. Truhlar, How enzymes work: analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations. Science, 2004. 303(5655): pp. 186-195
11. C.L. Stanton, I.W. Kuo, C.J. Mundy, T. Laino, K.N. Houk, QM/MM metadynamics study of the direct decarboxylation mechanism for orotidine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase using two different QM regions: acceleration too small to explain rate of enzyme catalysis. J Phys Chem B, 2007. 111(43): pp. 12573-12581.
12. A. Warshel, Computer simulations of enzyme catalysis: methods, progress, and insights. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 2003. 32: pp. 425-243.
13. L. Jiang, E.A. Althoff, F. R. Clemente, L. Doyle, D. Rothlisberger, A. Zanghellini, J.L. Gallaher, J.L. Betker, F. Tanaka, C.F. Barbas III, D. Hilvert, K.N. Houk, B.L. Stoddard, D. Baker, De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science, 2008. 319(5868): pp. 1387-1391.
14. D. Rothlisberger, O. Khersonsky, A.M. Wollacott, L. Jiang, J. DeChancie, J. Betker, J.L. Gallaher, E. A. Althoff, A. Zanghellini, O. Dym, S. Albeck, K.N. Houk, D.S. Tawfik, D. Baker, Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature, 2008. 453(7192): p. 190-195.
15. A. Zanghellini, L. Jiang, A.M. Wollacott, G. Cheng, J. Meiler, E.A. Althoff, D. Röthlisberger, D. Baker, New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci. 15(12), 2006. pp. 2785-2794
16. G. Dantas, B. Kuhlman, D. Callender, M. Wong, D. Baker, A Large scale test of computational protein desing: Folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 332(2), pp. 449-460 (2003).
17. J. Meiler, D. Baker, ROSETTALIGAND: Protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins 65, pp 538-548 (2006).
18. B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, E. Lee, J. Tao, Y. Zhao, Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18 (10), pp. 1039-1065. 2005.
19. E.A. Lee and T. Parks, Dataflow Process Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83(5), pp. 773-799, May 1995.
20. C. Pautasso, G. Alonso, Parallel Computing Patterns for Grid Workflows, In: Proc. of the HPDC2006 Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science WORKS06, Paris, France, June 2006.
21. I. Altintas, O. Barney, E. Jaeger-Frank, Provenance Collection Support in the Kepler Scientific Workflow System. Proceedings of International Provenance and Annotation Workshop (IPAW2006), pp. 118-132, 2006.
22. J. Wang, I. Altintas, P.R. Hosseini, D. Barseghian, D. Crawl, C. Berkley, M. B. Jones. Accelerating Parameter Sweep Workflows by Utilizing Ad-hoc Network Computing Resources: an Ecological Example. In Proceedings of IEEE 2009 Third International Workshop on Scientific Workflows (SWF 2009), 2009 Congress on Services (Services 2009), pp. 267-274, 2009.
23. Z. Zhou, F. Wang, B. D. Todd: Development of Chemistry Portal for Grid-enabled Molecular Science. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science'05), pp. 48-55, 2005.
24. S. Sild, U. Maran, A. Lomaka, M. Karelson, Open Computing Grid for Molecular Science and Engineering, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46, pp. 953-959, 2006.
25. R. Dooley, K. Milfeld, C. Guiang, S. Pamidighantam, G. Allen: From Proposal to Production: Lessons Learned Developing the Computational Chemistry Grid Cyberinfrastructure. J. Grid Computing, 4(2), pp.195-208 (2006).
26. E. Deelman, G. Mehta, G. Singh, M. Su, and K. Vahi. Pegasus: Mapping Large-Scale Workflows to Distributed Resources. In I. Taylor, E. Deelman, D. Gannon, and M. Shields, editors, Workflows for e-Science, pp. 376-394. Springer, New York, Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2007.
27. T. Fahringer, A. Jugravu, S. Pllana, R. Prodan, C. Seragiotto, Jr, and H. Truong, ASKALON: a tool set for cluster and Grid computing. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 17(2-4), pp. 143-169, Wiley InterScience, 2005.
28. Y. Zhao, M. Hategan, B. Clifford, I. Foster, G. von Laszewski, V. Nefedova, I. Raicu, T. Stef-Praun, M. Wilde, Swift: Fast, Reliable, Loosely Coupled Parallel Computation. Proceedings of 2007 IEEE Congress on Services (Services 2007), pp. 199-206, 2007.