On the foundation of the indigenous psychologies

Social Epistemology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-14

  Allwood, Carl Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Culture concept; Indigenous psychologies; Research programme

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650237289     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2010.534564     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adair, J. G. 1992. Empirical studies of indigenization and development of the discipline in developing countries. In Innovation in cross-cultural psychology, edited by S. Iwawaki, Y. Kashima, and K. Leung, pp. 62-74. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
2. Adair, J. G. 1998. Factors facilitating and impeding psychology's contribution to national development. Interamerican Journal of Psychology 32 (2): 13-32.
3. Adair, J. G. 1999. Indigenization of psychology: The concept and its practical implementation. Applied Psychology: An International Review 48 (4): 403-418.
4. Allwood, C.M. 2002. Indigenized psychologies. Social Epistemology 16 (4): 349-366.
5. Allwood, C.M., and J. W. Berry. 2006. Contributions by C. M. Allwood; J. W. Berry; P. Boski; F. M. Cheung; K.-K. Hwang; H. Kao; U. Kim and Y.-S. Park; L. Marai; F. M. Moghaddam; L. W. Nikora, M. Levy, B. Masters and M. Waitoki; A. B. Nsamenang; E. Protacio-De Castro (formerly Marcelino), M. C. Fabros and R. Kapunan; T. S. Saraswathi; J. B. P. Sinha; K.-S. Yang. Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology 41 (4): 243-268.
6. Atran, S., D. L. Medin, and N. O. Ross. 2005. The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review 112 (4): 744-776.
7. Barth, F. 1992. Towards greater naturalism in conceptualizing societies. In Conceptualizing society, edited by A. Kuper, pp. 17-33. London: Routledge.
8. Barth, F. 1993. Balinese worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Berry, J. W., and U. Kim. 1993. The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In Indigenous psychologies research and experience in cultural context, edited by U. Kim and J.W. Berry, pp. 277-80. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
10. Berry, J. W., and H. C. Triandis. 2006. Culture. In Psychological concepts. An international historical perspective, edited by K. Pawlik and G. d'Ydewalle, pp. 47-62. Hove: Psychology Press.
11. Church, A. T., and M. S. Katigbak. 2002. Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology 37 (3): 129-148.
12. Eagleton, T. 2000. The idea of culture. Oxford, UK:. Blackwell Publishing.
13. Enriquez, V. G. 1997. Filipino psychology concepts and methods. In Asian perspectives on psychology, Volume 19: Cross-cultural research and methodology series, edited by H.S.R. Kao and D. Sinha, pp. 40-53. London: Sage Publications.
14. Hwang, K.-K. 2006. Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society. International Journal of Psychology 41 (4): 276-281.
15. Keesing, R. M. 1981. Cultural anthropology. A contemporary perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16. Kim, U. 1995. Psychology, science, and culture: Cross-cultural analysis of national psychologies. International Journal of Psychology 30 (6): 663-679.
17. Kim, U. 2000. Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 3 (3): 265-287.
18. Kim, U., and J. W. Berry. 1993. Introduction. In Indigenous psychologies. Research and experience in cultural context, edited by U. Kim and J.W. Berry, pp. 1-29. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Kim U., and Y.-S. Park. 2005. Integrated analysis of the indigenous psychologies: Comments and extension of ideas presented by Shams, Jackson, Hwang and Kashima. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 8 (1): 75-95.
20. Kim U., and Y.-S. Park. 2006. The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology. In Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context, edited by U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, and K.-K. Hwang, pp. 27-48. New York: Springer.
21. Kim, U., K.-S. Yang, and K.-K. Hwang. 2006. Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context, edited by U. Kim, K.-S. Yang and K.-K. Hwang, pp. 3-25. New York: Springer.
22. Misra, G., U. Jain, and T. Singh. 2002. Culture and social cognition: The Indian experience. In Perspectives on indigenous psychology, edited by G. Misra and A.K. Mohanty, pp. 224-248. New Dehli: Concept Publishing Company.
23. Nanda, M. 2003. Prophets facing backwards. London: Rutgers University Press.
24. Okazaki, S., E. J. R. David, and N. Abelmann. 2008. Colonialism and psychology of culture. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (1): 90-106.
25. Poortinga, Y.H. 1999. Do differences in behaviour imply a need for different psychologies? Applied Psychology: An International Review 48 (4): 419-432.
26. Raina, D. 1997. Evolving perspectives on science and history: A chronicle of modern India's scientific enchantment and disenchantment. Social Epistemology 11 (1): 3-24.
27. Sinha, D. 1993. Indigenization of psychology in India and its relevance. In Indigenous psychologies. Research and experience in cultural context, edited by U. Kim and J. W. Berry, 30-43. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Sinha, D. 1997. Indigenizing psychology. In Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol 1: Theory and method, edited by J.W. Berry, Y. Poortinga and J. Pandey, pp. 129-69. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Sinha, D., and M. Sinha. 1997. Orientations to psychology: Asian and western. In Asian perspectives on psychology, Vol. 19: Cross-cultural research and methodology series, edited by H. S. R. Kao and D. Sinha, pp. 25-39. London: Sage Publications.
30. Smith, D. 2003. Hinduism and modernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
31. Stutley, M. 1985. Hinduism. The eternal law. Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, UK: The Aquarian Press.
32. Wikan, U. 1999. Culture: A new concept of race. Social Anthropology 7 (1): 57-64.
33. Woolgar, S. 1988. Science: The very idea. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood Limited.
34. Yamaguchi, S. 2004. Further clarifications of the concept of amae in relation to dependence and attachment. Human Development 47 (1): 28-33.
35. Yearly, S. 2005. Making sense of science. Understanding the social study of science. London: Sage.