Integrated analysis of indigenous psychologies: Comments and extensions of ideas presented by Shams, Jackson, Hwang and Kashima

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 75-95

  Kim, Uichol ^a   Park, Young Shin ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b Inha University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Epistemological analysis; Indigenous psychologies; Korea; Transactional model

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244368073     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00162.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adair, J. G. (1999). Indigenisation of psychology: The concept and its practical implementation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 403-418.
2. Adamopoulos, J. & Lonner, W. (2001). Culture and psychology at a crossroad: Historical perspective and theoretical analysis. In: D. Matsumoto, ed. Handbook of Culture and Psychology, pp. 11-34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Ahn, K. D., Hwang, J. K., Kim, U. & Park, Y. S. (1997). Adolescent Culture of Korea: Psycho-Social Structure and Dynamics. Seoul: Academy of Korean Studies.
4. Azuma, H. (1984). Psychology in a non-Western country. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 145-155.
5. Azuma, H. (1988). Are Japanese really that different? The concept of development as a key for transformation. Invited address at the 24th International Congress of Psychology Sydney, Australia, 28 August-2 September 1988.
6. Bandura, A. (1995). Manual for the Construction of Self-efficacy Scales. Unpublished Manuscript. USA: Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
8. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21-42.
9. Bandura, A. (2002). Environmental sustainability by sociocogntive deceleration of population growth. In: P. Schmuck & W. Schultz, eds. The Psychology of Sustainable Development, pp. 209-238. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Bandura, A. (2004). Swimming against the mainstream: The early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behavior Research and Therapy, 42, 613-630.
11. Berry, J. W. (1974). Canadian psychology: Some social and applied emphasis. Canadian Psychologist, 15, 132-139.
12. Berry, J. W. (1980). Introduction to methodology. In: H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry, eds. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 2. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Blumenthal, A. R. (1983). Wilhelm Wundt and early American psychology: A clash of cultures. In: R. W. Rieber, ed. Wilhelm Wundt and the Making of a Scientific Psychology. New York: Plenum.
14. Choi, S. C., Kim, U. & Choi, S. H. (1993). Korean culture and collective representation. In: Kim, U. & Berry, J. W., eds. Indigenous Psychologies: Experience and Research in Cultural Context, pp. 193-210. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Chorover, S. L. (1980). From Genesis to Genocide: The Meaning of Human Nature and the Power of Behavior Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
16. Danziger, K. (1983), Origins and basic principles of Wundt's Völkerpsychologie. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 303-313.
17. Doi, T. (1973). The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.
18. Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In: U. Kim & J. W. Berry, eds. Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context, pp. 152-169. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Gould, S. J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton.
20. Harré, R. (1999). The rediscovery of the human mind: The discursive approach. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 43-62.
21. Harré, R. & Gillet, G. (1994). The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Hermans, J. M. & Kempen, J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problem of cultural dichotomy in a globalized society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111-1120.
23. Ho, D. Y. F. (1986). Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review. In: M. H. Bond, ed. The Psychology of the Chinese People, pp. 1-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
25. Israel, J. & Tajfel, H., eds (1972). The Context of Social Psychology. London: Academic Press.
26. Johnson, F. A. (1993). Dependency and Japanese Socialization. New York: New York University Press.
27. Kamin, L. J. (1974), The Science and Politics of I.Q. New York: Penguin Books.
28. Kim, H. C., ed. (1992). Asian Americans and the Supreme Court: A Documentary History. New York: Greenwood.
29. Kim, U. (1998). Understanding Korean corporate culture: Analysis of transformative human resource management. Strategic Human Resource Development Review, 2, 68-101.
30. Kim, U. (1999). After the 'crisis' in social psychology: Development of the transactional model of science. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 1-19.
31. Kim, U. (2000). Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology; Theoretical, philosophical, and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 265-287.
32. Kim, U. (2001). Culture, science and indigenous psychologies: An integrated analysis. In: D. Matsumoto, ed. Handbook of Culture and Psychology, pp. 51-76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Kim, U., Aasen, H. S. & Ebadi, S. (2003). Democracy, Human Rights, and Islam in Modern Iran: Psychological, Social and Cultural Perspectives. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
34. Kim, U. & Berry, J. W. (1993). Indigenous Psychologies: Experience and Research in Cultural Context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Kim, U. & Choi, S. C. (1994). Individualism, collectivism, and child development: A Korean perspective. In: P. M. Greenfield & R. Cocking, eds. Cognitive Socialization of Minority Children: Continuities and Discontinuities, pp. 227-258. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Kim, U., Helgesen G. & Ahn, B. M. (2002). Democracy, trust, and political efficacy: Comparative analysis of Danish and Korean political culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 317-352.
37. Kim, U. & Park, Y. S. (2003). An indigenous analysis of success attribution: comparison of Korean students and adults. In: K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, P. Pedersen & I. Daibo, eds. Progress in Asian Social Psychology: Conceptual and Empirical Contributions, pp. 171-195. New York: Preager.
38. Kim, U., Park, Y. S. & Park, D. H. (1999). The Korean indigenous psychology approach: Theoretical considerations and empirical applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 55-73.
39. Kim, U., Park, Y. S. & Park, D. H. (2000). The challenge of cross-cultural psychology: The role of indigenous psychologies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 63-75.
40. Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Choi, S. C., Kagitcibasi, C. & Yoon, G., eds (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Kim, U. & Yamaguchi, S. (1995). Conceptual and empirical analysis of amae: Exploration into Japanese psycho-social space. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the Japanese Group Dynamics Association, pp. 158-159. Tokyo: Japanese Group Dynamics Association.
42. Kim, U., Yang, K. S. & Hwang, K. K. (in press). Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
43. Kimble, G. A. (1985). Conditioning and learning. In: S. Koch & D. E. Leary, eds. A Century of Psychology as Science, pp. 284-321. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Koch, S. (1985). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua 'science'. In: S. Koch & D. E. Leary, eds. A Century of Psychology as Science, pp. 75-99. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Koch, S. & Leary, D. E. (1985). A Century of Psychology as Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese Patterns of Behavior. Honolulu: East-West Center.
47. Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.
48. Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In: J. Israel & H. Tajfel, eds. The Context of Social Psychology. London: Academic.
49. Musser, G. (2004). Was Einstein right? Scientific American, 291, 88-91.
50. Nsamenang, A. B. (1995). Factors influencing the development of psychology in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 729-738.
51. Öngel, Ü. & Smith, P. B. (1999). The search for indigenous psychologies: Data from Turkey and the former USSR. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 465-479.
52. Pande, N. & Naidu, R. K. (1992). Anasakti and health: A study of non-attachment. Psychology and Developing Societies, 4, 91-104.
53. Park, Y. S. & Kim, U. (2004a). Parent-child relationship in Korea: Indigenous Psychological Analysis of Self-Concept and Family Role. Seoul: Kyoyook Kwahaksa.
54. Park, Y. S. & Kim, U. (2004b). Adolescent Culture and Parent-Child Relationship in Korea: Indigenous Psychological Analysis. Seoul: Kyoyook Kwahaksa.
55. PISA. (2000). http://www.pisa.oecd.org
56. Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Do differences in behavior imply a need for different psychologies? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 419-432.
57. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K. & Morelli, G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55, 1093-1104.
58. Sampson, E. E. (1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 35, 767-782.
59. Sampson, E. E. (1978). Scientific paradigms and social values: Wanted- A scientific revolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1332-1343.
60. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological sciences. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
61. Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through Cultures -Expeditions in Cultural Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
62. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In: J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga & J. Pandey, eds. Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology: Theory and Method, Vol. 1, pp. 25-41. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
63. Stevenson, H., Azuma, H. & Hakuta, K., eds (1986). Child Development and Education in Japan. New York: W.H. Freeman.
64. Stevenson, H. & Lee, S. Y. (1990). Context of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese Children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55, 1-95.
65. Taft, R. (1986). The psychological study of the adjustment and adaptation of immigrants to Australia. In: N. T. Feather, ed. Survey of Australian Psychology: Trend for Research. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
66. TIMSS. (1999). http://www.nces.ed.gov/timss
67. Triandis, H. (1972). The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: Wiley.
68. Triandis, H., ed. (1980). Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
69. Triandis, H. C. (2000). Dialectics between cultural and cross-cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 185-196.
70. Vernon, P. E. (1982). The Abilities and Achievements of Orientals in North America. New York: Academic.
71. White, M. I. & LeVine, R. A. (1986). What is an li ko (Good child)? In: H. Stevenson, H. Azuma & K. Hakuta, eds. Child Development and Education in Japan, pp. 55-62. New York: W. H. Freeman.
72. Yamaguchi, S. (2004a). Further clarifications of the concept of amae in relation to dependence and attachment. Human Development, 47, 28-33.
73. Yamaguchi, S. (2004b). An indigenous approach to a possibly etic phenomenon: A case of Amae. Keynote address presented at the 17th International Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychology; 4 August, Xi'an, China.
74. Yang, K. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241-263.
75. Yap, P. W. (1974). Comparative Psychiatry: A Theoretical Framework. Toronto: University of Toronto.
76. Yu, A. B. & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivistic societies. In: U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi & G. Yoon, eds. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, pp. 239-250. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.