Collaborative professional development toward literacy learning in a high school through Connected Coaching

Teacher Development

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 519-532

  Strahan, David ^a   Geitner, Martha ^b   Lodico, Michael ^b  

^a WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Asheville City Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; High school; In service professional development; Instructional coaching; Literacy teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650234506     PISSN: 13664530     EISSN: 17475120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2010.533493     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allington, R.L. 2001. What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
2. Beers, C. 2003. Reading strategies for the content areas. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
3. Donnelly, A., D. Morgan, D. DeFord, J. Files, S. Long, H. Mills, D. Stephens, and M. Styslinger. 2005. Transformative professional development: Negotiating knowledge with an inquiry stance. Language Arts 82, no. 5: 336-46.
4. Greene, T. 2004. Literature review for school-based staff developers and coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
5. Harvey, S., and A. Goudvis. 2000. Strategies that work. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
6. International Reading Association. 2004. Position statement 'The role and qualifications of the reaching coach in the United States.' Newark, DE: IRA.
7. Ivey, G., and K. Broaddus. 2000. Tailoring the fit: Reading instruction and middle school readers. The Reading Teacher 54, no. 1: 68-78.
8. Lambert, L. 2003. Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
9. Lapp, D., D. Fisher, J. Flood, and N. Frey. 2003. The dual role of the urban reading specialist. Staff Development Council 24, no. 2: 33-6.
10. Lieberman, A. 2005. Shaping mandates for school reform: Practices, problems, and possibilities. In Deep change: Cases and commentary on schools and programs of successful reform in high stakes states, ed. G. Ponder and D. Strahan, 141-50. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
11. Marzano, R. 2004. Building background knowledge. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
12. Merton, R. 1967. On theoretical sociology: Five essays, old and new. New York: Free Press.
13. Murphy, J. 2004. Leadership for Literacy: A framework for policy and practice. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 15, no. 1: 65-96.
14. National Council of Teachers of English. 2004. Research on adolescent literacy and recommendations. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
15. Poglino, S.M., A.J. Bach, K. Hovde, S. Rosenblum, M. Saunders, and J.A. Supovits. 2003. The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America's choice schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy and Research in Education.
16. Seuss, D. 1971. The Lorax. New York: Random House.
17. Shulman, L., and J. Shulman. 2004. How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies 36, no. 2: 257-71.
18. Symonds, K.W. 2003. Literacy coaching: How school districts can support a long-term strategy in a short-term world. San Francisco: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative.
19. Toll, C. 2004. Separating coaching from supervising. English Leadership Quarterly (October): 5-7.
20. Van Allsburg, C. 1991. The wretched stone. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Vogt, M., and B.A. Shearer. 2003. Serving as peer partner, cognitive coach, and supervisor. In Reading specialists in the real world: A sociocultural view, ed. M. Vogt and B.A. Shearer, 203-20. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
22. Yin, R. 1994. Case study research: Designs and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Yin, R. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.