Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 99-108

  Alonzo, Suzanne H ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BREEDING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MATING SUCCESS; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; CHILD PARENT RELATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PARENTING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 74049124341     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.012     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Andersson M. Social polyandry, parental investment, sexual selection, and evolution of reduced female gamete size. Evolution 58 (2004) 24-34
2. Thomas G.H., et al. Sexual conflict and the evolution of breeding systems in shorebirds. Adv. Study Behav. 37 (2007) 279-342
3. Westneat D.F. A retrospective and prospective view of genetics in mating systems: Toward a balanced view of the sexes. In: Appolonio M., et al. (Ed). Vertebrate Mating Systems (2000), World Scientific Publishing 253-306
4. Alonzo S.H., and Warner R.R. Dynamic games and field experiments examining intra- and inter-sexual conflict: Explaining counterintuitive mating behavior in a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus. Behav. Ecol. 11 (2000) 56-70
5. McNamara J.M., et al. The optimal coyness game. Proc. R. Soc. B 276 (2009) 953-960
6. Sheldon B.C. Relating paternity to paternal care. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 357 (2002) 341-350
7. Andersson M. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press
8. Hoelzer G.A. The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 38 (1989) 1067-1078
9. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Sexual Conflict (2005), Princeton University Press
10. Clutton-Brock T.H., and Isvaran K. Paternity loss in contrasting mammalian societies. Biol. Lett. 2 (2006) 513-516
11. Houston A.I., et al. Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 (2005) 33-38
12. Fromhage L., et al. Stability and value of male care for offspring: Is it worth only half the trouble?. Biol. Lett. 3 (2007) 234-236
13. Kokko H., and Jennions M.D. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J. Evol. Biol. 21 (2008) 919-948
14. Westneat D.F., and Sherman P.W. Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behav. Ecol. 4 (1993) 66-77
15. Silk J.B. Kin selection in primate groups. Int. J. Primat. 23 (2002) 849-875
16. Kempenaers B., and Sheldon B.C. Studying paternity and paternal care: Pitfalls and problems. Anim. Behav. 53 (1997) 423-427
17. Pampoulie C., et al. Have your cake and eat it too: Male sand gobies show more parental care in the presence of female partners. Behav. Ecol. 15 (2004) 199-204
18. Buchanan K.L., and Catchpole C.K. Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. Proc. R. Soc. B 267 (2000) 321-326
19. Pfaff J.A., et al. Song repertoire size varies with HVC volume and is indicative of male quality in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc. R. Soc. B 274 (2007) 2035-2040
20. Charmantier A., and Sheldon B.C. Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006) 417-419
21. Kotiaho J.S., and Puurtinen M. Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: Scrutiny of the current paradigm. Funct. Ecol. 21 (2007) 638-644
22. Jennions M.D., and Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75 (2000) 21-64
23. Gowaty P.A. Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Black J.L. (Ed). Partnerships in Birds (1995), Oxford University Press 21-52
24. Moller A.P. Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11 (2000) 161-168
25. Westneat D.F., and Stewart I.R.K. Extra-pair paternity in birds: Causes, correlates, and conflict. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34 (2003) 365-396
26. Wolff J.O., and Macdonald D.W. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 (2004) 127-134
27. Arnqvist G., and Kirkpatrick M. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: The strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am. Nat. 165 (2005) S26-S37
28. Albrecht T., et al. The strength of direct selection against female promiscuity is associated with rates of extrapair fertilizations in socially monogamous songbirds. Am. Nat. 167 (2006) 739-744
29. Griffith S.C. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: Neglected components of direct and indirect selection. Am. Nat. 169 (2007) 274-281
30. Hasselquist D., and Sherman P.W. Social mating systems and extrapair fertilizations in passerine birds. Behav. Ecol. 12 (2001) 457-466
31. Sheldon B.C., and Ellegren H. Paternal effort related to experimentally manipulated paternity of male collared flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. B 265 (1998) 1737-1742
32. Qvarnstrom A., et al. Male ornamentation, timing of breeding, and cost of polygyny in the collared flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. 14 (2003) 68-73
33. Rosivall B., et al. Effects of extrapair paternity and sex on nestling growth and condition in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Anim. Behav. 77 (2009) 611-617
34. Krist M., and Grim T. Are blue eggs a sexually selected signal of female collared flycatchers? A cross-fostering experiment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61 (2007) 863-876
35. Alonzo S.H. and Heckman, K. (in press) The unexpected but understandable dynamics of mating, paternity and paternal care in the ocellated wrasse. Proc. R. Soc. B
36. Alonzo S.H. Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse. Anim. Behav. 75 (2008) 1715-1723
37. Eggert A.K. Alternative male mate-finding tactics in burying beetles. Behav. Ecol. 3 (1992) 243-254
38. House C.M., et al. Sperm competition, alternative mating tactics and context-dependent fertilization success in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Proc. R. Soc. B 274 (2008) 1309-1315
39. House C.M., et al. The evolution of repeated mating in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Evolution 62 (2008) 2004-2014
40. Pagel M., and Meade A. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167 (2006) 808-825
41. Cummings M.E., et al. Sexual and social stimuli elicit rapid and contrasting genomic responses. Proc. R. Soc. B 275 (2008) 393-402
42. Desjardins J.K., et al. Sex and status in a cooperative breeding fish: Behavior and androgens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62 (2008) 785-794
43. Semsar K., and Godwin J. Multiple mechanisms of phenotype development in the bluehead wrasse. Horm. Behav. 45 (2004) 345-353
44. Brommer J.E., and Rattiste K. 'Hidden' reproductive conflict between mates in a wild bird population. Evolution 62 (2008) 2326-2333
45. Ellegren H., and Sheldon B.C. Genetic basis of fitness differences in natural populations. Nature 452 (2008) 169-175
46. Sommer S. Social and reproductive monogamy in rodents: The case of the Malagasy giant jumping rat (Hypogeomys antimena). In: Reichard U.H., and Boesch C. (Eds). Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans and Other Mammals (2003), Cambridge University Press 109-124
47. Drea C.M. Bateman revisited: The reproductive tactics of female primates. Int. Comp. Biol. 45 (2005) 915-923
48. Komers P.E., and Brotherton P.N.M. Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 264 (1997) 1261-1270
49. Ah-King M., et al. The influence of territoriality and mating system on the evolution of male care: A phylogenetic study on fish. J. Evol. Biol. 18 (2005) 371-382
50. Gonzalez-Voyer A., et al. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes. Evolution 62 (2008) 2015-2026
51. Wiklund C., et al. Sexual conflict and cooperation in butterfly reproduction: A comparative study of polyandry and female fitness. Proc. R. Soc. B 268 (2001) 1661-1667
52. Tallamy D.W. Sexual selection and the evolution of exclusive paternal care in arthropods. Anim. Behav. 60 (2000) 559-567
53. While G.M., et al. Family conflict and the evolution of sociality in reptiles. Behav. Ecol. (2009) 10.1093/beheco/apr015
54. Uller T., and Olsson M. Multiple paternity in reptiles: Patterns and processes. Mol. Ecol. 17 (2008) 2566-2580
55. Hardling R., et al. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: Prudent male courting and sperm-limited females. Am. Nat. 172 (2008) 259-271
56. Gavrilets S., and Hayashi T.I. The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 361 (2006) 345-354
57. Johnstone R.A., and Hinde C.A. Negotiation over offspring care: How should parents respond to each other's efforts?. Behav. Ecol. 17 (2006) 818-827
58. Moore A.J., and Pizzari T. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. Am. Nat. 165 (2005) S88-S97
59. Wolf J.B., et al. The role of maternal and paternal effects in the evolution of parental quality by sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12 (1999) 1157-1167
60. Alonzo S.H. Conflict between the sexes and cooperation within a sex can alter classic predictions of mating systems theory. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9 (2007) 145-156
61. Lande R. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34 (1980) 292-305
62. Rice S.H. Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations (2004), Sinauer Associates
63. Shouse B. Ecology: Conflict over cooperation. Science 299 (2003) 644-646
64. West S.A., et al. Conflict and cooperation: Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296 (2002) 72-75
65. West S.A., et al. Social semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20 (2007) 415-432
66. Hughes J.M., et al. High levels of extra-group paternity in a population of Australian magpies Gymnorhina tibicen: Evidence from microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 12 (2003) 3441-3450
67. Rubenstein D.R. Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: Trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity. Proc. R. Soc. B 274 (2007) 1895-1903
68. Brown M.J.F., and Schmid-Hempel P. The evolution of female multiple mating in social hymenoptera. Evolution 57 (2003) 2067-2081
69. Sakaluk S.K., and Muller J.K. Risk of sperm competition mediates copulation duration, but not paternity, of male burying beetles. J. Insect Behav. 21 (2008) 153-163
70. Hunt J., and Simmons L.W. Confidence of paternity and paternal care: Covariation revealed through the experimental manipulation of the mating system in the beetle Onthophagus taurus. J. Evol. Biol. 15 (2002) 784-795
71. Hardling R., et al. Male golden egg bugs (Phyllomorpha laciniata Vill.) do not preferentially accept their true genetic offspring. Ecol. Entom. 32 (2007) 575-577
72. Neff B.D. Decisions about parental care in response to perceived paternity. Nature 422 (2003) 716-719
73. Rios-Cardenas O., and Webster A.S. Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish. Behav. Ecol. 16 (2005) 914-921
74. Ostlund-Nilsson S. Does paternity or paternal investment determine the level of paternal care and does female choice explain egg stealing in the fifteen-spined stickleback?. Behav. Ecol. 13 (2002) 188-192
75. Svensson O., and Kvarnemo C. Parasitic spawning in sand gobies: An experimental assessment of nest-opening size, sneaker male cues, paternity, and filial cannibalism. Behav. Ecol. 18 (2007) 410-419
76. Bouwman K.M., et al. Male reed buntings do not adjust parental effort in relation to extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 16 (2005) 499-506
77. Westneat D.F., et al. Within brood patterns of paternity and paternal behavior in red-winged blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37 (1995) 349-356
78. Peterson K.A., et al. Allocation of male parental care in relation to paternity within and among broods of the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). Ethol. 107 (2001) 573-586
79. Dickinson J.L. Male share of provisioning is not influenced by actual or apparent loss of paternity in western bluebirds. Behav. Ecol. 14 (2003) 360-366
80. Lifjeld J.T., et al. Experimentally reduced paternity affects paternal effort and reproductive success in pied flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 55 (1998) 319-329
81. Paul A., et al. The sociobiology of male-infant interactions in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim. Behav. 51 (1996) 155-170
82. Buchan J.C., et al. True paternal care in a multi-male primate society. Nature 425 (2003) 179-181
83. Cohas A., et al. Are extra-pair young better than within-pair young? A comparison of survival and dominance in alpine marmot. J. Anim. Ecol. 76 (2007) 771-781
84. Young A.J., et al. Subordinate male meerkats prospect for extra-group paternity: Alternative reproductive tactics in a cooperative mammal. Proc. R. Soc. B 274 (2007) 1603-1609
85. Apicella C.L., and Marlowe F.W. Men's reproductive investment decisions: Mating, parenting, and self-perceived mate value. Hum. Nat. 18 (2007) 22-34
86. Eggert A.K., and Muller J.K. Mating success of pheromone-emitting Necrophorus males: Do attracted females discriminate against resource owners?. Behav. 110 (1989) 248-257
87. Simmons L.W., and Kotiaho J.S. Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 16604-16608
88. Kaitala A. Is egg carrying attractive? Mate choice in the golden egg bug (Coreidae, Heteroptera). Proc. R. Soc. B 265 (1998) 779-783
89. Ostlund S., and Ahnesjo I. Female fifteen-spined sticklebacks prefer better fathers. Anim. Behav. 56 (1998) 1177-1183
90. Ostlund-Nilsson S. Fifteen-spined stickleback (Spinachia spinachia) females prefer males with more secretional threads in their nests: An honest-condition display by males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50 (2001) 263-269
91. Forsgren E. Female sand gobies prefer good fathers over dominant males. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 264 (1997) 1283-1286
92. Bouwman K.M., et al. How female reed buntings benefit from extra-pair mating behaviour: Testing hypotheses through patterns of paternity in sequential broods. Mol. Ecol. 15 (2006) 2589-2600
93. Westneat D.F. No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success. Am. Nat. 167 (2006) E171-E189
94. Mitchell D.P., et al. Attractive males provide less parental care in two populations of the common yellowthroat. Anim. Behav. 73 (2007) 165-170
95. Lampe H.M., and Espmark Y.O. Mate choice in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: Can females use song to find high-quality males and territories?. Ibis 145 (2003) E24-E33
96. Brauch K., et al. Sex-specific reproductive behaviours and paternity in free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62 (2008) 1453-1466
97. Palombit R.A., et al. The adaptive value of 'friendships' to female baboons: Experimental and observational evidence. Anim. Behav. 54 (1997) 599-614
98. Cohas A., et al. The genetic similarity between pair members influences the frequency of extrapair paternity in alpine marmots. Anim. Behav. 76 (2008) 87-95
99. Clutton-Brock T.H., et al. Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals. Nature 444 (2006) 1065-1068
100. Roberts S.C., and Little A.C. Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 134 (2008) 31-43