Design research for cadastral systems

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 77-87

  Çaǧdaş, Volkan ^a   Stubkjær, Erik ^b  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cadastre; Design research (science); Geographical information system; Land administration; Research methodology; Spatial data infrastructure

Indexed keywords

CADASTRE; DESIGN RESEARCH (SCIENCE); GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAND ADMINISTRATION; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE;

DESIGN; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CADASTRE; GIS; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAND MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PROPERTY RIGHTS; SPATIAL DATA; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 78650214504     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Akingbade A., Navarra D.D., Georgiadou Y. A 10years review and classification of the geographic information systems impact literature (1998-2008). Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 2009, 4:84-116.
2. Augustinus C., Barry M.B. Land management strategy formulation in post-conflict societies. Survey Review 2006, 38(302):668-681.
3. Auzins A. Institutional arrangements: A gate towards sustainable land use. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 2004, 1(1):57-71.
4. Barry M.B., Fourie C. Analyzing cadastral systems in uncertain situations: A conceptual framework based on soft systems theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16(1):23-40.
5. Becker J., Niehaves B., Janiesch C. Socio-technical perspectives on design science in IS research. Advances in information systems development 2007, 127-139. Springer. W. Wojtkowski, W.G. Wojtkowski, J. Zupancic, G. Magyar, G. Knapp (Eds.).
6. Billen R., Zlatanova S. 3D spatial relationships model: A useful concept for 3D cadastre?. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2003, 27(4):411-425.
7. Bittner, S. (2001). An agent-based model of reality in a cadastre. PhD dissertation. Technical University Vienna.
8. Bittner S., Frank A.U. A formal model of correctness in a cadastre. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2002, 26:465-482.
9. Blaikie N. Designing social research 2000, Polity Press, Cambridge.
10. Boudourides, M. A. (2001). The politics of technological innovations: Network approaches. In User involvement in technological innovation, Deutschlandsberg, Austria, July 8-14.
11. Bromley D.W. Economic interests and institutions - The conceptual foundation of public policy 1989, Blackwell, New York.
12. Çaǧdaş V., Stubkjær E. Doctoral research on cadastral development. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(4):869-889.
13. Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishsherman of St. Brieuc Bay. Power, action and belief 1986, 196-223. Routledge, London. J. Law (Ed.).
14. Carlsson, S. A. (2006). Towards an information systems design research framework: A critical realist perspective. In Proceedings of the first international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST2006) (pp. 192-212). Claremont, USA.
15. Cashin S.M., McGrath G. Establishing a modern cadastral system within a transition country: Consequences for the Republic of Moldova. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:629-642.
16. Castelein, W. T. & de Bruin, S. (2007). Transaction costs for assessment of geo-information applications in agri-environmental policy. In Proceedings of 10th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, 8-11 May 2007 (pp. 1-8). Aalborg, Denmark.
17. Cavanagh T. Diverse designing, sorting out function and intention in artifacts. Philosophy and design, from engineering to architecture 2008, 301-315. Springer, Netherlands. P.E. Vermaas, P. Kroes, A. Light, S.A. Moore (Eds.).
18. Checkland P. Systems thinking, systems practice 1981, John Wiley & Sons, Toronto.
19. Checkland P.B. Soft systems methodology: A 30-year retrospective 1999, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
20. Checkland P.B., Holwell S. Information, systems and information systems - Making sense of the field 1998, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
21. Checkland P., Scholes J. Soft systems methodology in action 1990, John Wiley & Sons, Toronto.
22. Comber A., Fisher P., Wadsworth R. Actor-network theory: A suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop?. Land Use Policy 2003, 20:299-309.
23. Dahlbom B., Mathiassen L. Computer in context - The philosophy and practice of system design 1993, Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford.
24. Dale P. A systems view of the cadastre. Survey Review 1979, 25(191):28-32.
25. Dale P., Mclaughlin J. Land administration 1999, Oxford University Press, New York.
26. De Man W.H.E. Understanding SDI; complexity and institutionalization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20(3):329-343.
27. Effenberg, W. (2001). Spatial cadastral information systems - The maintenance of digital cadastral maps. PhD dissertation. University of Melbourne.
28. Eggertsson T. Economic behavior and institutions 1990, CUP, Cambridge.
29. ESF/COST G9 (2001). Modelling real property transactions. , Accessed 15.01.08. http://www.cost.esf.org/index.php?id=262&action_number=g9.
30. Frankfort-Nachmias C., Nachmias D. Research methods in the social sciences 1997, Arnold, London.
31. Georgiadou Y., Puri S.K., Sahay S. Towards a potential research agenda to guide the implementation of spatial data infrastructures - A case study from India. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(10):1113-1130.
32. Georgiadou Y., Puri S.K., Sahay S. The rainbow metaphor: Spatial data infrastructure organization in India. International Studies of Management and Organization 2006, 35(4):48-70.
33. Gregor S. A theory of theories in information systems. Information systems foundations: Building the theoretical base 2002, 1-20. Australian National University, Canberra. S. Gregor, D. Hart (Eds.).
34. Gregor S. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly 2006, 30(3):611-642.
35. Grus L., Crompvoets J., Bregt A.K. Spatial data infrastructures as complex adaptive systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2010, 24(3):439-463.
36. Harvey F. Constructing GIS: Actor networks of collaboration. URISA Journal 2001, 13(1):29-37.
37. Hevner A.R., March S.T., Park J., Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 2004, 28(1):75-106.
38. INSPIRE (2009). INSPIRE D2.8.I.6 data specification on cadastral parcels - Guidelines. Accessed 17.02.10. http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_CP_v3.0.pdf.
39. ISNIE (2009). What is new institutional economics? Accessed 15.01.08. http://www.isnie.org/about.html.
40. ISO/TC211 (2008). Geographic information/geomatics, New Work i{dotless}tem proposal, geographic information - Land administration domain model (LADM), ISO/TC211 N 2385, 2008-02-01. Accessed 17.02.10. http://www.gdmc.nl/oosterom/ISO19152LADM_WD3.pdf.
41. Karikari I., Stillwell J., Carver S. The application of GIS in the lands sector of a developing country: Challenges facing land administrators in Ghana. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(3):343-362.
42. Kauppi U., Lahdesmaki K., Ojala I. Modernizing public services: The possibilities and challenges of electronic services in Finnish public sector. Governing networks 2003, 191-207. IOS Press, Amsterdam. A. Salminen (Ed.).
43. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions 1970, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
44. Krek, A. (2002). An agent-based model for quantifying the economic value of geographic information. PhD thesis. Technical University Vienna.
45. Kroes P.A., Franssen M.P.M., Poel I.V.D., Ottens M. Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: Some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioural Science 2006, 23:803-814.
46. Kuechler W.W., Vaishnavi V. The emergence of design research in information systems in North America. Journal of Design Research 2008, 7(1):1-16.
47. Larsson G. Land registration and cadastral systems 1991, Longman, New York.
48. Latour B. Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society 1987, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
49. Lemmen, C. & van Oosterom, P. (2006). Version 1.0 of the FIG core cadastral domain model. In XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, October 8-13.
50. Lemmen, C. H. J., van Oosterom, P. J. M., Uitermark, H. T., Thompson, R. & Hespanha, J. (2009). Transforming the land administration domain model into an ISO standard - ISO19152. In Proceedings of the FIG working week: Surveyors key role in accelerated development, Eilat, Israel, May 3-8.
51. Livari J. A Paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 2007, 19(2):39-64.
52. Ljungberg, J. (2008). Combining actor network theory and genre theory to understand the evolution of digital genres. Sprouts: Working papers on information systems (Vol. 8. No. 20). Accessed 17.02.10. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/8-20.
53. March S.T., Smith G.F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 1995, 15:251-266.
54. March S.T., Storey V.C. Design science in the information systems discipline: An introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly 2008, 32(4):725-730.
55. Martin, E. W. (1998). GIS Implementation and the Un-Theory: Some useful concepts from ANT. Accessed 15.01.08. http://students.washington.edu/ewmartin/papers/martin_GIS_ANT.html.
56. Martin E.W. Actor-networks and implementation: Examples from conservation GIS in Ecuador. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2000, 14(8):715-738.
57. Navratil, G. (2002). Formalisierung von Gesetzen - Am Beispiel des Österreichischen Allgemeinen Grundbuchsgesetzes. PhD dissertation. Technische Universität Wien.
58. Navratil G., Frank A.U. Processes in a cadastre. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2004, 28(5):471-486.
59. Navratil G., Frank A. Hierarchies in subdivision processes. Real property transactions 2007, 221-235. IOS Press, Amsterdam. J. Zevenbergen, A. Frank, E. Stubkjær (Eds.).
60. Navratil, G., Twaroch, F., & Frank, A. U. (2005). Complexity vs. security in the Austrian land register. In CORP 2005 & Geomultimedia05, Vienna, Austria, February 22-25.
61. Nichols, S. E. (1993). Land registration: Managing information for land administration. PhD Dissertation. University of New Brunswick.
62. Nidumolu U.B., de Bie C.A.J.M., van Keulen H., Skidmore A.K., Harmsen K. Review of a land use planning programmeme through the soft systems methodology. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(2):187-203.
63. Nkwae, B. (2006). Conceptual framework for modeling and analyzing periurban land problems in Southern Africa. PhD dissertation. University of New Brunswick.
64. North D.C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance 1990, CUP, New York.
65. Omran E.E., van Etten J. Spatial-data sharing: Applying social-network analysis to study individual and collective behaviour. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2007, 21(6):699-714.
66. Österberg, T. (2006). Land administration for economic development - Experiences from institutional development projects. In XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, October 8-13.
67. Ottens, M. (2004). The cadastral system as a socio-technical system. In Workshop on standardization on the cadastral domain, Bamberg, Germany, December 9-10.
68. Ottens M., Stubkjær E. A socio-technical analysis of the cadastral system. Real property transactions 2007, 143-166. IOS Press, Amsterdam. J. Zevenbergen, A. Frank, E. Stubkjær (Eds.).
69. Peffers K., Tuunanen T., Rothenberger M.A., Chatterjee S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 2008, 24(3):45-77.
70. Rakai, M. E. T. (2005). A neutral framework for modeling and analysing Aboriginal land tenure Systems. PhD dissertation. University of New Brunswick.
71. Röling N. The soft side of the land: Socio-economic sustainability of land use systems. Special issue: Geo-information for sustainable land management. ITC-Journal 1997, 3(4):248-262.
72. Roux, L. & Barry, M. (2009). Paradigms and cadastral research. In FIG regional conference, Hanoi, Vietnam, October 19-22.
73. Schmeer, K. (2004). Guidelines for conducting a stakeholder analysis. Bethesda, MD: Partnerships for Health Reform. Abt Associates Inc. Accessed 17.02.10. http://www.who.int/management/partnerships/overall/GuidelinesConductingStakeholderAnalysis.pdf.
74. Sevatdal H. Real estate planning - An applied academic subject. Kart og Plan 1999, 59(3):258-266.
75. Sevatdal, H. (2002). Land administration and land management: An institutional approach. In FIG XXII international congress, Washington, DC, USA, April 19-26.
76. Sikor T. Politics of rural land registration in post-socialist societies: Contested titling in villages of Northwest Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:617-628.
77. Silva, M. A. (2005). Modelling causes of cadastral development: Cases in Portugal and Spain during the last two decades. PhD dissertation. Aalborg University.
78. Silva M.A., Stubkjær E. A review of methodologies used in research on cadastral development. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2002, 26:403-423.
79. Stoter J.E. 3D cadastre 2004, NCG, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft.
80. Stoter J.E., Salzmann M. Towards a 3D cadastre: Where do cadastral needs and technical possibilities meet?. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2003, 27(4):395-410.
81. Stubkjær, E. (2000). Real estate and the ontology of multidisciplinary, e.g. cadastral studies. In S. Winter (Ed.) Proceedings of the EuroConference on ontology and epistemology for spatial data standards (pp. 97-109). Vienna, Austria.
82. Stubkjaer, E. (2006). The cadastre as a socio-technical system. GIS Development. Accessed 15.01.08. http://www.gisdevelopment.net/magazine/years/2006/june/26_1.htm.
83. The ontology and modelling of real estate transactions 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot. H. Stuckenschmidt, E. Stubkjær, C. Schlieder (Eds.).
84. Stubkjær E., Frank A., Zevenbergen J. Modelling real property transactions - An overview. Real property transactions 2007, 3-24. IOS Press, Amsterdam. J. Zevenbergen, A. Frank, E. Stubkjær (Eds.).
85. Tse R.O.C., Gold C.M. A proposed connectivity-based model for a 3-D cadastre. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2003, 27(4):427-445.
86. Tuladhar, A. M. (2004). Parcel-based geo-information system: Concepts and guidelines. PhD dissertation. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation.
87. van Loenen, B. (2006). Developing geographic information infrastructures - The role of information policies. PhD dissertation. Delft University of Technology.
88. van Oosterom, P. & Lemmen, C. (2002). Towards a standard for the cadastral domain: Proposal to establish a cadastral data model. In Towards a cadastral core domain model 3rd workshop and 4th MC meeting of the COST G9 action: Modelling real property transactions, Delft, the Netherlands, October 10-12.
89. van Oosterom P., Lemmen C., Ingvarsson T., van der Molen P., Ploeger H., Quak W., et al. The core cadastral domain model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2006, 30(5):627-660.
90. Venable, J. (2006). The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In S. Chatterjee & A. Hevner (Eds.) Proceedings of the first international conference on design science in information systems and technology (DESRIST 2006) (pp. 1-18). Claremont.
91. Vermaas P.E., Kroes P., Light A., Moore S.A. Philosophy and design, from engineering to architecture 2008, Springer, Amsterdam.
92. Von Bertalanffy L. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications 1969, Braziller, New York.
93. Williamson, I. (2002). The cadastral 'tool box' - A framework for reform. In FIG XXII international congress, Washington DC, USA, April 19-26.
94. Winter R. Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 2008, 17:470-475.
95. Zevenbergen J. Systems of land registration, aspects and effects 2002, NCG, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft.
96. Real property transactions: Procedures, transaction costs and models 2007, IOS Press, Amsterdam. J. Zevenbergen, A. Frank, E. Stubkjær (Eds.).