Diverse designing: Sorting out function and intention in artifacts

Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 301-315

  Cavanagh, Ted ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650193871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Bijker, W., Hughes, T., and Pinch, T., eds., 1985, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A.
2. Bourdieu, P., 1990, In Other Words, Polity Press, Cambridge.
3. Borgmann, A., 1992, Crossing the Postmodern Divide, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Cavanagh, T., 2000, On permanence: thoughts about a historical reconstruction of a value basic to building, J. Arch. Educ. 54(2):45-54.
5. Cavanagh, T., and Kroeker, R., 2005, Revaluing wood, in: Sustainable Architectures, Cultures and Natures in Europe and North America, S. Guy and S. Moore, eds., Spon Press, Abingdon, U.K., pp. 123-143.
6. Cowan, R., 1985, The consumption junction: a proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology, in The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 262-280.
7. Feenberg, A., 1999, Questioning Technology, Routledge, New York.
8. Feenberg, A., 2002, Transforming Technology, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Gruber, T., 1993, Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing, Technical Report KSL 93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University; http://ksl-web.stanford.edu/KSL-Abstracts/KSL-93-04.html
10. Hansson, S., 2002a, Understanding technological function: introduction to the special issue on the dual nature programme, Techné 6(2):1-3.
11. Hansson, S., 2002b, Boxmeer (June 13, 2002); www.infra.kth.se/~soh/ DualNatureConcepts.pdf
12. Hounshell, D., 1984, From the American System to Mass Production, 1800-1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
13. Hughes, T., 1989, American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870-1970, Viking, New York.
14. Kira, A., 1976, The Bathroom, Viking Press, New York.
15. Kroes, P., 2001, Technical functions as dispositions: a critical assessment, Techné 5(3):1-16.
16. Kroes, P., 2003, Screwdriver philosophy; Searle's analysis of technical functions, Techné 6(3):22-35.
17. Kroes, P., and Meijers, A., 2002a, The dual nature of technical artifacts: presentation of a new research programme, Techné 6(2):4-8.
18. Kroes, P., and Meijers, A., 2002b, Reply to critics, Techné 6(2):39-40.
19. Kuhn, T., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
20. Maybee, R., 1960, Michigan's White Pine Era: 1840-1900, Michigan Historical Commission, Lansing, MI.
21. Mitcham, C., 2002, Do artifacts have dual natures? Two points of commentary on the Delft Project, Techné 6(2):9-12.
22. Moran, T., 2002, London (June 25, 2002); http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/ 2002/08/tom-moran-on-ev.html
23. Rykwert, J., 1982, The Necessity of Artifice, Academy Editions, London, pp. 23-32.
24. Stross, B., 1999, The hybrid metaphor from biology to culture, Journal of American Folklore 112:254-267.
25. Wachsmann, K., 1961, The Turning Point of Building: Structure and Design, Reinhold, New York.