Socio-technical perspectives on design science in IS research

Advances in Information Systems Development: New Methods and Practice for the Networked Society

Volumn 2, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 127-138

  Becker, Jörg ^a   Niehaves, Björn ^a   Janiesch, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889038618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Applegate LM, King JL (1999) Rigor and relevance: careers on the line. MIS Quarterly 23:17-18.
2. Banville C, Landry M (1989) Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined? Communications of the ACM 32:48-60.
3. Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Wiley, Chichester.
4. Benbasat I, Zmud RW (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. MIS Quarterly 23:3-16.
5. Benbasat I, Zmud RW (2003) The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties. MIS Quarterly 27:183-194.
6. Boland R (1989) The Experience of System Design: A Hermeneutic of Organizational Action. Scandinavian Journal of Management 5:87-104.
7. Bostrom R, Heinen JS (1977) MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. MIS Quarterly.
8. Brooke C (2002) Critical Perspectives on Information Systems: An Impression of the Research Landscape. Journal of Information Technology 17:271-283.
9. Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft Systems Methodologies in Action. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
10. Churchman CW (1979) The Systems Approach. Dell, New York/NY.
11. Darke P, Shanks G, Broadbent M (1998) Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8:273-289.
12. Fischer G, Nakakoji K, Ostwaldl J (1995) Supporting the evolution of design artifacts with representations of context and intent. Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems archive: Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods & Techniques (DIS 1995), Ann Arbor, MI, pp 7-15.
13. Galliers RD (1997) Reflections on Information Systems research: Twelve points of debate. In: Mingers J, Stowell F (eds). Information Systems Research: An Emerging Discipline. London, pp 141-157.
14. Heller F (1997) Sociotechnology and the Environment. Human Relations 50:605- 624.
15. Hevner AR, March TS, Park J, Sudha R (2004) Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28:75-105.
16. Hirschheim R, Newman M (1991) Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research 2:29-62.
17. Keen PGW (1980) MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems. Philadelphia/PA, pp 9-18.
18. Knights D, Murray F (1994) Managers Divided. Wiley, Chichester.
19. Lee AS (2000) Systems Thinking, Design Science, and Paradigms. Heeding Three Lessons from the Past to Resolve Three Dilemmas in the Present to Direkt a Trajectory for Future Research in the Information Systems Field (Keynote Speech). 11th International Conference on Information Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
20. Lyytinen K (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research. MIS Quarterly 23:25-28.
21. March TS, Smith G (1995) Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15:251-266.
22. Markus ML, Davenport TH (1999) Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly 23:19-23.
23. McGrath K (2005) Doing Critical Research in Information Systems: A Case of Theory and Practice Not Informing Each Other. Information Systems Journal 15:85-101.
24. Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12:240-259.
25. Mumford E, Weir M (1979) Computer Systems in Work Design - The ETHICS Method. Associated Business Press, London, UK.
26. Niehaves B (2005) Epistemological Perspectives on Pluralist IS Research. 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany.
27. Nunamaker JF, Chen M, Purdin TDM (1991) Systems Development in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7:89- 106.
28. Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12:121-134.
29. Rossi M, Sein M (2003) Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach. IRIS 2003. Helsinki. Finland
30. Scheer A-W (2000) ARIS - Business Process Modeling Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
31. Simon H (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press. Cambridge. MA.
32. Walls J, Widmeyer G. El Sawy O (1992) Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3:36-59.
33. Weber R (1987) Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Basis for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Systems 1:3-19.
34. Weber R (2003) Still Desperately Seeking the IT. Artifact. MIS Quarterly 27:iii-ii.