Mixed methods research design: A comparison of prevalence in JRME and AERJ

International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 233-245

  Ross, Amanda A ^a,b   Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ^c  

^a Texas A and M University ^*  (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematics education; Methodological pluralism; Mixed methods research articles

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650150528     PISSN: 18340806     EISSN: 18340814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.233     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 103-126.
2. Berrios, R., & Lucca, N. (2006). Qualitative methodology in counseling research: Recent contributions and challenges for a new century. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 174-186.
3. Blake, R. L. (1989). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in family research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 13-21.
4. Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Bryman, A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In J. Brannen (Ed.) Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 89-111). Aldershot, UK: Avebury Press.
6. Caracelli, V. W., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 195-207.
7. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2006). Prevalence of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Evaluation and Research in Education, 19, 83-101.
8. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Sutton, I. L. (2007, February). The role of mixed methods in special education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
9. Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed method research: Introduction and application. In T. Cijek (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455-472). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals ofFamilyMedicine, 2, 7-12.
11. Currall, S. C., & Towler, A. J. (2003). Research methods in management and organizational research: Toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 513-526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Davis, R. B. (1967). The range of rhetorics, scale and other variables. Proceedings of National Conference on Needed Research in Mathematics Education in the Journal of Research and Development in Education, 2(1), 51074.
13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Dzurec, L. C., & Abraham, J. L. (1993). The nature of inquiry: Linking quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 16, 73-79.
15. Education Sciences Reform Act. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-279. Retrieved February 26, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/leg/PL107-279.pdf
16. Forthofer, M. S. (2003). Status of mixed methods in the health sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 527-540). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation No. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
19. Guba, E. G. (1987). What have we learned about naturalistic evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8, 23-43.
20. Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 224-235.
21. Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Swars, S. L., & Smith, M. E. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 26-41.
22. Haverkamp, B. E., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, S. L. (2005). A time and place for qualitative and mixed methods in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 123-125.
23. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
24. Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatability thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 27(18), 10-16.
25. Hunter, A., & Brewer, J. (2003). Multimethod research in sociology. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 577-594). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
27. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
28. Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297-319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. In M. M. Mark & R. L. Shotland (Eds.). Multiple methods in program evaluation: New directions of program evaluation 35 (pp. 57-75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Kromrey, J. D., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Hogarty, K. Y. (2006). The continua of disciplined inquiry: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. In S. Permuth & R. Mawdsley (Eds.), Research methods for studying legal issues in education (pp. 91-129). Dayton, OH: Education Law Association.
31. Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2006, November). Mixed methods research in counseling research: The past, present, and future. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Birmingham, AL.
32. Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM — The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37, 457-467.
33. Lester, F. K., & Lambdin, D. V. (2003). From amateur to professional: The emergence and maturation of the U.S. mathematics education research community. In G. M. A. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), A history of school mathematics (pp. 1629-1700). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
34. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35. Madey, D. L. (1982). Some benefits of integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation, with some illustrations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 223-236.
36. Mark, M. M., & Shotland, R. L. (1987). Alternative models for the use of multiple methods. In M. M. Mark & R. L. Shotland (Eds.). Multiple methods in program evaluation: New directions of program evaluation 35 (pp. 95-100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 362-376.
38. Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Advisory Committee. (2003). Education research in the No Child Left Behind environment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 185-189.
41. Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
42. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). Mixed methods research in sociology and beyond. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. VI, pp. 2978-2981). Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Jiao, Q. G., & Bostick, S. L. (2004). Library anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (Research Methods in Library and Information Studies, No. 1). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
44. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Jiao, Q. G., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). Mixed methods research: A new direction for the study of stress and coping. In G. Gates (Ed.), Emerging thought and research on students, teacher, and administrator stress and coping (Research on Stress and Coping in Education) (Vol. 4, pp. 215-243). Greenway, CT: Information Age.
45. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2004). Mixed method and mixed model research. In R. B. Johnson & L. B. Christensen (Eds.), Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (pp. 408-431). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
46. Powell, H., Mihalas, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Suldo, S., & Daley, C. E. (2008). Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 291-309.
47. Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation context: A pragmatic framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 491-512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Reichardt, D. S., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (1994). Qualitative and quantitative inquiries are not incompatible: A call for a new partnership. In C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives (pp. 85-92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. Rocco, T. S., Bliss, L. A., Gallagher, S., Perez-Prado, A., Alacaci, C., Dwyer, E. S., Fine, J. C., & Pappamihiel, N. E. (2003). The pragmatic and dialectical lenses: Two views of mixed methods use in education. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 595-615). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Ross, A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008, February). Prevalence of mixed methods research in mathematics education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, SC.
52. Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
53. Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers don’t count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 24, 230-240.
54. Scandura, J. M. (Ed.). (1967). Research in mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
55. Sechrest, L., & Sidana, S. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative? Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 77-87.
56. Silver, E. (2004). Ella Minnow Pea: An allegory of our times? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 154-156.
57. Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
58. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Twinn, S. (2003). Status of mixed methods research in nursing. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 541-556). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Waszak, C., & Sines, M. C. (2003). Mixed methods in psychological research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 557-576). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 431-459.