Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 291-309

  Powell, Heather ^a   Mihalas, Stephanie ^b   Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ^c   Suldo, Shannon ^b   Daley, Christine E ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Department of Pharmacy

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449112149     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20296     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adler, L. (1996). Qualitative research of legal issues. In D. Schimmel (Ed.), Research that makes a difference: Complementary methods for examining legal issues in education, NOLPE Monograph Series (No. 56) (pp. 3-31). Topeka, KS: NOLPE.
2. American School Counselor Association. (2006). Role of the school counselor. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from http://www.schoolcounselor.org/content.asp?pl=327&sl=341&contentid=341
3. Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Beran, T. N., & Tutty, L. (2002). Children's reports of bullying and safety at school. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 17(2), 1-14.
5. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 267-294.
8. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.
9. Cowie, H., & Olafsson, R. (2000). The role of peer support in helping the victims of bullying in a school with high levels of aggression. School Psychology International, 21(1), 79-95.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Crothers, L. M. (2001). Childhood bullying: Middle school students' perceptions of the problem and preferences for teacher intervention. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62(1-A), 76.
12. Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washbum, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1001 -1014.
13. Doggett, R. A., Edwards, R. P., Moore, J. W., Tingstrom, D. H., & Wilczynski, S. M. (2001). An approach to functional assessment in general education classroom settings. School Psychology Review, 30, 313-328.
14. Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data, as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16-23.
15. Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589-600.
16. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
17. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Halpern, E. S. (1983). Auditing naturalistic inquiries: The development and application of a model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
19. Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Piano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 224-235.
20. Hazel, C. E. (2004). School safety sacrificed to standardized assessment of achievement: The story of one neighborhood elementary school community. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64(8-B), 4109.
21. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
23. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2005, April). Mixed methods research: Is there a criterion of demarcation?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
24. Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297-319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2000). Uncovering critical research agendas for school psychology. School Psychology Review, 29, 591-603.
26. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(4), 341-389.
27. Kvale, S. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 19-40.
28. Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (in press). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology.
29. Madey, D. L. (1982). Some benefits of integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation, with some illustrations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 223-236.
30. Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-299.
31. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). (2000). Professional conduct manual: Principles for professional ethics, Guidelines for the provision of school psychological services. Bethesda, MD: Author.
33. National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). (2006). NASP-approved graduate programs in school psychology. Communiqué, 35(3), 44.
34. Newman, I., Ridenour, C. S., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G. M. P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2003a). Effect sizes in qualitative research: A prolegomenon. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 37, 393-409.
37. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2003b). Expanding the framework of internal and external validity in quantitative research. Research in the Schools, 10(1), 71-90.
38. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281-316. Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-2/ on wuegbuzie2.pdf
39. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2004). Mixed method and mixed model research. In R. B. Johnson & L. B. Christensen (Eds.), Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (pp. 408-431). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
41. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of "significant" findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770-792. Retrieved February 20, 2008, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR9-4/ onwuegbuzie.pdf
42. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatist researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8, 375-387.
43. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11, 474-498. Retrieved February 20, 2008, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QRl l=3/onwuegbuzie.pdf
44. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 41, 233-249.
45. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Osterman, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Fraczek, A., et al. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggression Behavior, 24, 1-8.
47. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization - Empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398-419). New York: Guilford Press.
48. Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-12.
49. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2006, April). Validity issues in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
52. Teräsahjo, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2003). "She is not actually bullied." The discourse of harassment in student groups. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 134-154.
53. Todd, Z., Nerlich, B., & McKeown, S. (2004). Introduction. In Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Mixing methods in psychology: The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (pp. 3-16). Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
54. Waszak, C., & Sines, M. C. (2003). Mixed methods in psychological research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 557-576). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures. Chicago: Rand McNally.
56. Willems, E. P., & Raush, H. L. (1969). Naturalistic viewpoints in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
57. Ysseldyke, J. (2005). Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 125-128.