Between the General and the Unique: Overcoming the Nomothetic versus Idiographic Opposition

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 817-833

  Salvatore, Sergio ^a   Valsiner, Jaan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^b CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

abduction; aggregation; generalization; idiographic; nomothetic

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650127861     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354310381156     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allport, G.W. (1962). The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality, 30, 405-422.
2. Allport, G.W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21, 110.
3. Beckstead, Z., Cabell, K.R., & Valsiner, J. (2009). Generalizing through conditional analysis: Causality in the world of eternal becoming. Humana Mente, 11, 65-80.
4. Hurlburt, R.T., & Knapp, T.J. (2006). Münsterberg in 1898, not Allport in 1937, introduced the terms “idiographic” and “nomothetic” to American psychology. Theory & Psychology, 16, 287-293.
5. Lamiell, J.T. (1998). “Nomothetic” and “idiographic”: Contrasting Windelband's understanding with contemporary usage. Theory & Psychology, 8, 23-38.
6. Lamiell, J.T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Lauro-Grotto, R.P., Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., & Gelo O. (2009). The unbearable dynamicity of psychological processes: Highlights of the psychodynamic theories. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 1-30). New York, NY: Springer.
8. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte NC: Information Age.
9. Loevinger, J. (1965). Person and population as psychometric concepts. Psychological Review, 72, 143-155.
10. Lotze, H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or the physiology of the soul]. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
11. Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51, 164-179.
12. Maruyama, M. (1995). Individual epistemological heterogeneity across cultures and its use in organizations. Cybernetica, 37, 215-249.
13. Maturana, M.R., & Varela, J.F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
14. Matusov, E. (2008). Applying a sociocultural approach to Vygotskian academia: “Our tsar isn–t like yours and yours isn–t like ours”. Culture & Psychology, 14, 5-35.
15. Molenaar, P.C.M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201-218.
16. Molenaar, P.C.M., & Valsiner, J. (2009). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 1, pp. 23-38). Rome, Italy: Firera. Retrieved from http://www.valsiner.com/articles/molen-vals.htm (Original work published 2005)
17. Mos, L.P. (1998). On methodological distinctions: Nomothetic psychology, or historical understanding. Theory & Psychology, 8, 39-57.
18. Münsterberg, H. (1899). Psychology and history. Psychological Review, 6, 1-31.
19. Peirce, C.S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Rosenbaum, P.J., & Valsiner, J. (in press). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology.
21. Salvatore, S. (2006). Models of knowledge and psychological action. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 1 (2-3). Retrieved from http://www.rivistadipsicologiaclinica.it/english/number2/Salvatore.htm
22. Salvatore, S., Lauro-Grotto, R., Gennaro, A., & Gelo, O. (2009), Attempts to grasp the dynamicity of intersubjectivity. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 171-190). New York, NY: Springer.
23. Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2009), Idiographic science on its way: Towards making sense of psychology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 1, pp. 9-19). Rome, Italy: Firera.
24. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout, S., & Clegg J. (Eds.). (2009). Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 1). Rome, Italy: Firera.
25. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Travers, J., & Gennaro, A. (2010). Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 2). Rome, Italy: Firera.
26. Smedslund, J. (1988). What is measured by a psychological measure? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 148-151.
27. Smedslund, J. (1992). Are Frijda's “laws of emotion” empirical? Cognition & Emotion, 6, 435-456.
28. Smedslund, J. (1995). Psychologic: Common sense and the pseudoempirical. In J.A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 196-206). London, UK: Sage.
29. Smedslund, J. (2009). The mismatch between current research methods and the nature of psychological phenomena. Theory & Psychology, 19, 778-794.
30. Toomela, A. (2007). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41, 6-20.
31. Toomela, A. (2008). Variables in psychology: A critique of quantitative psychology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 42, 245-265.
32. Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox-and how it escapes from that box. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 45-66). New York, NY: Springer.
33. Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
34. Valsiner, J. (Ed.). (1986). The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.
35. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi, India: Sage.
36. Valsiner, J. (2009). Baldwin's quest: A universal logic of development. In J.W. Clegg (Ed.), The observation of human systems: Lessons from the history of antireductionistic empirical psychology (pp. 45-82). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
37. Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2006). Historically structured sampling (HSS): How can psychology's methodology become tuned in to the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kölbl, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning (pp. 215-251). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.
38. Windelband, W. (1876, May). Über das gegenwårtigen Stand der Psychologischen Forschung [On the contemporary situation in psychological research]. Speech at the entrance into professorship at University of Zürich, Leipzig, Germany: von Breitkopf & Hårtel.
39. Windelband, W. (1904). Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft [History and natural science]. Strasbourg, France: Heitz & Mündel.
40. Windelband, W. (1998). History and natural science. Theory & Psychology, 8, 5-22. (Original work published 1904)
41. Yurevich, A. (2009). Cognitive frames in psychology: Demarcations and ruptures. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 43, 89-103.