Grasping the dynamic nature of intersubjectivity

Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 171-190

  Salvatore, Sergio ^a   Lauro Grotto, Rosapia ^b   Gennaro, Alessandro ^a   Gelo, Omar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c SIGMUND FREUD UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892242015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction. An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambribge University Press.
2. Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1993). The shape of change in psychotherapy: Longitudinal assessment of personal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 667-677. (Pubitemid 23230090)
3. Borckardt, J. J., et al. (2008). Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research. A guide to case based time-series analysis. American Psychologist, 63(2), 77-95.
4. Gennaro, A., Salvatore, S., Lis, A., & Salcuni, S. (2008, June 18-22). Looking at the psychotherapy process as an intersubjective dynamic of sensemaking. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Society of Psychotherapy Research Barcelona, Spain.
5. Grassi, R. (2008). Validazione di un modello di analisi delle narrazioni attraverso uno studio idiografico. L 'Analisi Frastica Multidimensionale (AFM) [Validation of a model of narrative analysis. An idiographic study with the Multidimensional Utterance Analysis]. Ph.D dissertation, University of Salento-Lecce.
6. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
7. Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press Inc.
8. Krause, M. S., Howard, K. I., & Lutz, W. (1998). Exploring individual change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 838-845. (Pubitemid 28478352)
9. Lambert, M. J. (Ed.). (2004). Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
10. Lancia, F. (2002). The logic of a textscope. Retrieved August 18, 2007, from http://www.tlab.it/en/bibliography.php
11. Lancia, F. (2010 forthcoming). Word co-occurrence and similarity in meaning. In S. Salvatore & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Mind as infinite dimensionality. Roma: Firera Publishing Group.
12. Langs, R. (1974). The technique of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.
13. Laurenceau, J. P., Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. C. (2007). Statistical and methodological issues in the study of change in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 715-723. (Pubitemid 46899299)
14. Lauro-Grotto, R. P., Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., & Gelo O. (2009). The unbearable dynamicity of psychological processes: Highlights of the psychodynamic theories. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 1-30). New York: Springer.
15. Mahoney, M. J. (1991). Human change processes. The scientific foundations of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
16. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction. An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambribge University Press.
17. Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1993). The shape of change in psychotherapy: Longitudinal assessment of personal problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 667-677. (Pubitemid 23230090)
18. Borckardt, J. J., et al. (2008). Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research. A guide to case based time-series analysis. American Psychologist, 63(2), 77-95.
19. Gennaro, A., Salvatore, S., Lis, A., & Salcuni, S. (2008, June 18-22). Looking at the psychotherapy process as an intersubjective dynamic of sensemaking. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Society of Psychotherapy Research Barcelona, Spain.
20. Grassi, R. (2008). Validazione di un modello di analisi delle narrazioni attraverso uno studio idiografico. L 'Analisi Frastica Multidimensionale (AFM) [Validation of a model of narrative analysis. An idiographic study with the Multidimensional Utterance Analysis]. Ph.D dissertation, University of Salento-Lecce.
21. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
22. Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press Inc.
23. Krause, M. S., Howard, K. I., & Lutz, W. (1998). Exploring individual change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 838-845. (Pubitemid 28478352)
24. Lambert, M. J. (Ed.). (2004). Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
25. Lancia, F. (2002). The logic of a textscope. Retrieved August 18, 2007, from http://www.tlab. it/en/bibliography.php
26. Lancia, F. (2010 forthcoming). Word co-occurrence and similarity in meaning. In S. Salvatore & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Mind as infinite dimensionality. Roma: Firera Publishing Group.
27. Langs, R. (1974). The technique of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.
28. Laurenceau, J. P., Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. C. (2007). Statistical and methodological issues in the study of change in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 715-723. (Pubitemid 46899299)
29. Lauro-Grotto, R. P., Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., & Gelo O. (2009). The unbearable dynamicity of psychological processes: Highlights of the psychodynamic theories. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 1-30). New York: Springer.
30. Mahoney, M. J. (1991). Human change processes. The scientific foundations of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
31. Maruyama, M. (1999). Heterogram analysis: Where the assumption of normal distribution is illogical. Human Systems Management, 18, 53-60.
32. Mergenthaler, E. (1996). Emotion abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing therapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1306-1318.
33. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Valsiner, J. (2005). How generalization works through the single case. A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. International Journal of Idiographic Science. (Reprinted in S. Salvatore et al. (2009). Yearbook of idiographic science 2008. (Vol. 1). Rome: G Fireira Group)
34. Nightingale, D. J., & Cromby, J. (Eds.). (1999). Social constructionist psychology. A critical analysis of theory andpractice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
35. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, T. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
36. Raudenbusch, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes: Sage
37. Salvatore, S., Gelo, O., Gennaro, A., Manzo, S., Al-Radaideh, A. (in press). Looking at thepsychotherapy process as an intersubjective dynamics of meaning making. A case study with discourse flow analyzer.
38. Salvatore, S., Lis, A., Salcuni, S., Serio, A. V., Gennaro, A., Mossi, P. et al. (2006, September 28-October 1). Confronto tra studio delle difese e della dinamica discorsiva nell'analisi del processo terapeutico. Studio di un caso [Comparison of defense mechanisms and discursive dynamics in the therapeutic process. A case study]. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Meeting of the Italian Chapter of the Society of Psychotherapy Research. Reggio Calabria, Italy.
39. Salvatore, S., Tebaldi, C., & Poti, S. (2008). The discoursive dynamic of sensemaking. In S. Sal-vatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science 2008 (pp. 39-72). Rome: Firera Publishing Group.
40. Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2009) The unconscious as source of sense: A psychodynamic approach to meaning. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformations: The mind in movement through culture and society. London: Routledge.
41. Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., & Pennak, S. (2005). A historical framework for cohort differences in intelligence. Research in Human Development, 2, 43-67.
42. Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., Falcone, M., Nicolo, G., Procacci, M., et al. (2003). Assessing problematic states inside patient's narratives. The grid of problematic conditions. Psychotherapy Research, 13(3), 337-353. (Pubitemid 40990845)
43. TLAB-Tools for text analysis. By T-LAB? di Lancia Franco. Retrieved August 10, 2007, from http://tlab.it
44. Toomela, A. (2008). Variables in psychology: A critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(3), 245-265.
45. Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox-and how it escapes from that box. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Moolenar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 45-66). New York: Springer.
46. Tschacher, W., Schiepek, G., & Brummer, E. J. (Eds.). (1992). Self-organization and clinical psychology. Empirical approaches to synergetics in psychology. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
47. Valsiner, J., Salvatore, S., Strout, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.). (2009). Yearbook of idiographic science. 2008. (Vol. 1). Rome: Firera Publishing Group.
48. Venuleo, C., & Salvatore, S. (2006). Linguaggi e dispositivi comunicativi. I Faccia a Faccia tel-evisivi [Languages and communication devices. Face to face television debates]. In S. Cris-tante, & P. Mele (Eds.), Da Vendola a Prodi. I media nelle campagne elettorali 2005-2006 (pp. 151-189). Nardo, LE: Besa Editrice.