Disability and Pap Smear Receipt Among U.S. Women, 2000 and 2005

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 258-266

  Rivera Drew, Julia A ^a   Short, Susan E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISABLED PERSON; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VAGINA SMEAR; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISABLED PERSONS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL SMEARS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650114021     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: 19312393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/4225810     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, United States Cancer Statistics: 2002 Incidence and Mortality, Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Cancer Prevention Institute, 2005.
2. Mayo Clinic Staff, Cervical cancer, <>, accessed Jan. 26, 2010.
3. Dunne EF et al., Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States, Journal of the American Medical Association, 2007, 297(8):813-819.
4. Berg AO, Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale: United States Preventive Services Task Force, 2004, <>, accessed Sept. 11, 2010.
5. Duberstein LD et al., Provision of contraceptive and related services by publicly funded family planning clinics, 2003, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(3):139-147.
6. Kuo DY and Goldberg GL, Screening of cervical cancer: Where do we go from here? Cancer Investigation, 2003, 21(1):157-161.
7. Altman B and Bernstein A, Disability and Health in the United States, 2001-2005, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), 2008.
8. DeJong G et al., The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities, Milbank Quarterly, 2002, 80(2):261-301.
9. Iezzoni LI et al., Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services, American Journal of Public Health, 2000, 90(6):955-961.
10. Albrecht GL, Rationing health care to disabled people, Sociology of Health and Illness, 2001, 23(5):654-677.
11. Carmona RH and Cabe J, Improving the health and wellness of persons with disabilities: a call to action, American Journal of Public Health, 2005, 95(11):1883.
12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Guidelines for Women-s Health Care, second ed., Washington, DC: ACOG, 2002, pp.121-134 & 140-141.
13. Smith RA et al., American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002, 52(1):8-22.
14. Sawaya GF, Cervical-cancer screening-new guidelines and the balance between benefits and harms, New England Journal of Medicine, 2009, 361(26):2503-2505.
15. Saint M, Gildengorin G and Sawaya GF, Current cervical neoplasia screening practices of obstetrician/gynecologists in the US, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005, 192(2):414-421.
16. Grady D, Guidelines push back age for cervical cancer tests, New York Times, Nov. 20, 2009, <>, accessed Feb. 2, 2010.
17. Hewitt M, Devesa SS and Breen N, Cervical cancer screening among US women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey, Preventive Medicine, 2004, 39(2):270-278.
18. Ramirez A et al., Disability and preventive cancer screening: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey, American Journal of Public Health, 2005, 95(11):2057-2064.
19. Nosek MA and Howland CA, Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997, 78(12, Suppl. 5):S39-S44.
20. Swan J et al., Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey, Cancer, 2003, 97(6):1528-1540.
21. Diab ME and Johnston MV, Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004, 85(5):749-757.
22. World Health Organization (WHO), International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, Geneva: WHO, 2001, p. 10.
23. Kroll T et al., Barriers and strategies affecting the utilization of primary preventive services for people with physical disabilities: a qualitative inquiry, Health and Social Care in the Community, 2006, 14(4):284-293.
24. Nosek MA et al., National Study of Women with Physical Disabilities: final report, Sexuality and Disability, 2001, 13(1):5-40.
25. Smeltzer SC, Preventive health screening for breast and cervical cancer and osteoporosis in women with physical disabilities, Family and Community Health, 2006, 29(Suppl. 1):35S-43S.
26. Havercamp SM, Scandlin D and Roth M, Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina, Public Health Reports, 2004, 119(4):418-426.
27. O-Toole CJ and Doe T, Sexuality and disabled parents with disabled children, Sexuality and Disability, 2002, 20(1):89-101.
28. Milligan MS and Neufeldt AH, The myth of asexuality: a survey of social and empirical evidence, Sexuality and Disability, 2001, 19(2):91-109.
29. Block P, Sexuality, fertility, and danger: twentieth-century images of women with cognitive disabilities, Sexuality and Disability, 2000, 18(4):239-254.
30. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Data File Documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2000 (Machine Readable Data File and Documentation), 2002, <>, accessed Sept. 23, 2010.
31. NCHS, Data File Documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2005 (Machine Readable Data File and Documentation), 2006, <>, accessed Sept. 23, 2010.
32. Horton NJ and Kleinman KP, Much ado about nothing: a comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models, American Statistician, 2007, 61(1):79-90.
33. Royston P, Multiple imputation of missing values: update, Stata Journal, 2005, 5(2):1-14.
34. Radecki C, Pearson Breitkopf HC and Breitkopf DM, Poor knowledge regarding the Pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2005, 37(2):78-84.
35. Maybe I-ll get better on my own, editorial, New York Times, Jun. 30, 2008, <>, accessed Jan. 26, 2010.
36. Tomlinson M et al., Research priorities for health of people with disabilities: an expert opinion exercise, Lancet, 2009, 374(9704):1857-1862.
37. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Interactive site for clinicians serving women with disabilities, <>, accessed Jan. 26, 2010.
38. CDC, National breast and cervical cancer early detection program, <>, accessed Jan. 26, 2010.
39. National Women-s Law Center and Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Women-s Access to Health Care: A State-Level Analysis of Key Health Policies, Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003.
40. CDC, HPV Fact Sheet, <>, accessed Jan. 26, 2010.