American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 8-22

  Smith, Robert A ^a   Cokkinides, Vilma ^a   Von Eschenbach, Andrew C ^b   Levin, Bernard ^c   Cohen, Carmel ^d   Runowicz, Carolyn D ^e   Sener, Stephen ^f   Saslow, Debbie ^a   Eyre, Harmon J ^a  

^a AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BARIUM ENEMA; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CASE FINDING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; GENDER; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTESTINE EXAMINATION; LUNG CANCER; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0036157770     PISSN: 00079235     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.52.1.8     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer CA
2. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: Update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: Update 2001-testing for early lung cancer detection
3. Guidelines for the cancer-related check-up
4. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: Update 1997
5. American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer: An overview
6. Quality determinants of mammography
7. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium
8. The Swedish Two County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up
9. Beyond randomized controlled trials: Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality
10. Preventive health care, 2001 update: Should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer?
11. Is it time to stop teaching breast self-examination?
12. The Breast Cancer Wars
13. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
14. Assessment of nationwide screening programs
15. Screening mammography re-evaluated
16. Screening mammography re-evaluated
17. Screening mammography re-evaluated
18. Screening mammography re-evaluated
19. Screening mammography re-evaluated
20. Screening mammography re-evaluated
21. Populist instead of professional
22. Screening for breast cancer with mammography (Cochrane Review)
23. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography
24. Screening mammography-an overview revisited
25. Breast cancer screening with mammography: Overview of Swedish randomized trials
26. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center
27. Perspective on digital mammography
28. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer
29. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear
30. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: An overview
31. Epidemiologic evidence and human papillomavirus infection as a necessary cause of cervical cancer
32. Cost-effectiveness of three methods to enhance the sensitivity of Papanicolaou testing
33. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer
34. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality
35. Screening endoscopy and risk of colorectal cancer in United States men
36. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon
37. Cost-effectiveness analysis of immunochemical occult blood screening for colorectal cancer among three fecal sampling methods
38. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1998
39. Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria(1)
40. ACS report on the cancer-related health check-up
41. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: Overall design and findings from baseline screening
42. Planning effort underway for international collaboration on studies of lung cancer screening with CT spiral
43. State- And sex-specific prevalence of selected characteristics-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1996 and 1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
44. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
45. Update: National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1991-September 1995. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
46. Cultural barriers to cancer screening among African-American women: A Critical review of the qualitative literature
47. Trends in mammography use and their relation to physician and other factors
48. The role of physician recommendation in women's mammography use: Is it a 2-stage process?
49. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices
50. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: A review
51. Compliance with mammography screening guidelines: 1995 Mammography Attitudes and Usage Study Report
52. Barriers to screening for breast cancer
53. Why do some women get regular mammograms?
54. Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening
55. Cancer: Improving early detection and prevention. A community practice randomized trial
56. Changing office routines to enhance preventive care. The preventive GAPS approach
57. Characteristics of primary care office systems as predictors of mammography utilization
58. The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice
59. Promoting cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions
60. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial