Disability and preventive cancer screening: Results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 95, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2057-2064

  Ramirez, Anthony ^a,c   Farmer, Gail C ^b   Grant, David ^c   Papachristou, Theodora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ANTIGEN DETECTION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DISABILITY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAMMOGRAPHY; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

CALIFORNIA; DISABLED PERSONS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASMS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 27644568929     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066118     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Schopp LH, Sanford TC, Hagglund KJ, Gay JW, Coatney MA. Removing service barriers for women with physical disabilities: promoting accessibility in the gynecologic care setting. J Midwifery Women Health. 2002;47:74-79.
2. MMWR. Use of cervical and breast preventive cancer screening among women with and without functional limitations-United States, 1994-1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:853-856.
3. Roetzheim RG, Chirikos TN. Breast cancer detection and outcomes in a disability beneficiary population. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2002;13:461-476.
4. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Siebens H. Mobility Impairments and Use of Screening and Preventive Services. Am J Public Health. 90:955-961.
5. Bockeneck WL, Mann N, Lanig IS, DeJong G, Beatty LA. Primary care for persons with disabilities. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM, eds. Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers;1998:905-928.
6. DeJong G. Primary care for persons with disabilities An overview of the problem. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76(suppl):S2-S8.
7. Andriacchi R. Primary care for persons with disabilities. The internal medicine perspective. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76(suppl):S17-S20.
8. McNeil JM. Americans With Disabilities: 2000. US Census Bureau, Population Division, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, Current Population Reports. Washington, DC; 2001.
9. Jha A, Patrick DL, MacLehose RF, Doctor JN, Chan L. Dissatisfaction with medical services among Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1335-1341.
10. Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Harris-David L, O'Day B. Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities. Am J Med Qual. 2001;16:135-144.
11. Dejong G, Palsbo SE, Beatty PW, Jones GC, Knoll T, Neri MT. The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities. Milbank Q. 2002;80:261-301.
12. Caban ME, Nosek MA, Graves D, Esteva FJ, McNeese M. Breast carcinoma treatment received by women with disabilities compared with women without disabilities. Cancer. 2002;94:1391-1396.
13. Welner SL, Foley CC, Nosek MA, Holmes A. Practical considerations in the performance of physical examinations on women with disabilities. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54:457-462.
14. Grabois EW, Nosek MA, Rossi CD. Accessibility of primary care physicians' offices for people with disabilities. An analysis of compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:44-51.
15. Nosek MA, Howland CA. Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(Suppl 5):S39-S44.
16. Diab ME, Johnston MV. Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:749-757.
17. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey on Disability, Phase 1 and Phase 2, 1994 (machine readable data file and documentation, CD-ROM Series 10, No. 8A). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998.
18. Andersen RM. Revisiting the Behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Beha. 1995;36:1-10.
19. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. The CHIS 2001 Sample: Response Rate and Representativeness. Technical Paper Number 1, December 2003. Available at: http://www.chis.ucla.edu/pdf/2001_response_representativeness.pdf (PDF file). Accessed August 24, 2004.
20. LaPlante MP. The demographics of disability. Milbank Q. 1991;69(Suppl 1-2):55-77.
21. Brandt EN, Pope AM (eds). Committee on Assessing Rehabilitation Science and Engineering: Enabling America. Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
22. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation. A Manual of Dimensions of Disablement and Functioning: Beta-1 Draft for Field Trials. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1997.
23. Churchland PS. Neurophilosophy: toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Body. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1986.
24. DeJong G. Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:435-446.
25. DeJong G. Environmental Accessibility and Independent Living Outcomes. Directions for Disability Policy and Research. East Lansing, MI: University Center for International Rehabilitation, Michigan State University; 1981.
26. Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48:595-607.
27. Frieden L, Richards L, Cole J, et al. ILRU Source Book: A Technical Assistance Manual on Independent Living. Houston, TX, The International Institute for Rehabilitation and Research; 1979.
28. Goodman A. Organic unity theory: the mind-body problem revisited. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:553-563.
29. Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In Pope AM, Tarlov AR (eds). Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991:309-327.
30. Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1993.
31. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980.
32. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179-186.
33. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. Available at: http://www. who.int/icidh/whodas. Accessed August 24, 2004.
34. Cornelius LJ, Altman BM. Have we succeeded in reducing barriers to medical care for African and Hispanic Americans with disabilities? Soc Work Health Care. 1995;22:1-17.
35. Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, Saver BG. Disparities in Health Care by Race, Ethnicity, and Language Among the Insured. Medical Care. 2002;40:52-59.
36. Joslyn SA. Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:1759-1766.
37. Giroux J, Welty TK, Oliver FK, Kaur JS, Leonardson G, Cobb N. Low national breast and cervical cancer-screening rates in American Indian and Alaska Native women with diabetes. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13:239-245.
38. Jazieh AR, Buncher CR. Racial and age-related disparities in obtaining screening mammography: results of a statewide database. South Med J. 2002;95:1145-1148.
39. Ganesan K, Teklehaimanot S, Akhtar AJ, Wijegunaratne J, Thadepalli K, Ganesan N. Racial differences in preventive practices of African-American and Hispanic women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:515-518.
40. Gilliland FD, Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Stauber P, Key CR. Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, 1994-1997. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:432-437.
41. Gilliland FD, Welsh DJ, Hoffman RM, Key CR. Rapid rise and subsequent decline in prostate cancer incidence rates for New Mexico, 1989-1993. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1995;4:797-800.
42. Crump SR, Mayberry RM, Taylor BD, Barefield KP, Thomas PE. Factors related to noncompliance with screening mammogram appointments among low-income African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:237-246.
43. Selvin E, Brett KM. Breast and cervical preventive cancer screening: sododemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:618-623.
44. Tishler J, McCarthy EP, Rind DM, Hamel MB. Breast preventive cancer screening for older women in a primary care practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:961-966.
45. Rawl SM, Champion VL, Menon U, Foster JL. The impact of age and race on mammography practices. Health Care Women Internat. 2000;21:583-597.
46. Roetzheim RG, Pal N, Tennant C, et al. Effects of Health Insurance and Race on Early Detection of Cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1409-1415.
47. Clegg LX, Li FP, Hankey BF, Chu K, Edwards BK. Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1985-1993.
48. Zietman A, Moughan J, Owen J, Hanks G. The Patterns of Care Survey of radiation therapy in localized prostate cancer: similarities between the practice nationally and in minority-rich areas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:75-80.
49. Batavia AI, Dejong G. Disability, chronic illness, and risk selection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:546-552.
50. Long SK, Coughlin TA, Kendall SJ. Access to care among disabled adults on medicaid. Health Care Financing Rev. 2002;23:159-173.
51. Rutledge DN, Barsevick A, Knobf TM, Bookbinder M. Breast cancer detection: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of women from Pennsylvania. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28:1032-1040.
52. Caban ME, Nosek MA, Graves D, Esteva FJ, McNeese M. Breast carcinoma treatment received by women with disabilities compared with women without disabilities. Cancer. 2002;94:1391-1396.
53. Beatty PW, Dhont KR. Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional coverage: perceptions of health care among beneficiaries with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1009-1017.
54. Brown ER, Davidson PL, Yu H, et al. Effects of community factors on access to ambulatory care for lower-income adults in large urban communities. Inquiry. 2004;41:39-56.
55. Davidson PL, Andersen RM, Wyn R, Brown ER. ERA framework for evaluating safety-net and other community-level factors on access for low-income populations. Inquiry. 2004;41:21-38.
56. Brown ER, Lavarreda SA, Meng YY, et al. County residency and access to care for low- and moderate-income Californians. Policy Brief UCLA Cent. Health Policy Res. 2004;(PB2004-1):1-6.
57. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 3rd Edition: Periodic Updates. US. Preventive Services Task Force. October 2002. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/gcpspu.htm. Accessed November 29, 2004.
58. Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of large health surveys: accounting for sampling design. J Royal Stat Soc: A (Stat Soc). 1995;158:263-295.
59. Winship C, Radbill L. Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociol Methods Res. 1994;23:230-257.