National revision burden for lumbar total Disc replacement in the United States: Epidemiologic and economic perspectives

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 690-696

  Kurtz, Steven M ^a   Lau, Edmund ^a   Ianuzzi, Allyson ^a   Schmier, Jordana ^a   Todd, Lanman ^b   Isaza, Jorge ^c   Albert, Todd J ^d  

^a EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^b Division of Neurosurgery   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Charges; CHARIT ; Cost; Degenerative disc disease; Lumbar spine; Outcome; ProDisc; Revision; Total disc arthroplasty; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH CARE COST; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR DISK; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SPINE SURGERY; TOTAL DISK REPLACEMENT; UNITED STATES; ADULT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78650086234     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d0fabb     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS, et al. Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE artificial disc. Spine 2006;31:1217-26.
2. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32: 1155-62; discussion 1163.
3. Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L, et al. Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Spine 2008;33:1276-83.
4. Leary SP, Regan JJ, Lanman TH, et al. Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement. Spine 2007;32: 1001-11.
5. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30:1576-83; discussion E388-90.
6. Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, et al. Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 2008;17:36-43.
7. Phurrough S, Salive ME, O'Connor D, et al. Proposed coverage decision memorandum for lumbar artificial disc replacement (LADR). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). 2007. Available at: http://www1.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/ viewdraftdecisionmemo.asp?from2-viewdraftdecisionmemo.asp&id-197&. Accessed January 15, 2009.
8. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, et al. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84A(suppl 2):2-20.
9. Roder C, Muller U, Aebi M. The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J 2006;15(suppl 1):S52-6.
10. Kurtz SM, Mowat F, Ong K, et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1487-97.
11. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:128-33.
12. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, et al. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 2005;30:1441-5; discussion 6-7.
13. Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R. National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990-2000. Neurosurgery 2005;57: 753-8; discussion 758.
14. Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Wainess R, et al. Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States. Neurosurgery 2006;59:15-20; discussion 15-20.
15. Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, et al. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine 2006;31:1957-63; discussion 1964.
16. Wang MC, Chan L, Maiman DJ, et al. Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States. Spine 2007;32:342-7.
17. Schluessmann E, Diel P, Aghayev E, et al. SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc protheses. Eur Spine J 2009; 18:851-61.
18. Patel VV, Estes S, Lindley EM, et al. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:473-6.
19. Guyer RD, Tromanhauser SG, Regan JJ. An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine J 2007;7:558-62.
20. Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, et al. Comparative charge analysis of oneand two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 2007;32:2905-9.
21. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45: 613-9.
22. Torrance GW, Siegel JE, Luce BR. Framing and designing the costeffectiveness analysis. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996:54-81.
23. Siepe CJ, Wiechert K, Khattab MF, et al. Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1001-13.
24. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 2008;8:8-20.
25. Chin KR. Epidemiology of indications and contraindications to total disc replacement in an academic practice. Spine J 2007;7:392-8.
26. Anderson PA, Kurtz SM, Toth JM. Explant analysis of total disc replacement. Semin Spine Surg 2006;18:1-12.