Explant Analysis of Total Disc Replacement

Seminars in Spine Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 109-116

  Anderson, Paul A ^a   Kurtz, Steven M ^b,c   Toth, Jeffrey M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^c Implant Research Center   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

bone in growth; explant analysis; intervertebral disc arthroplasty; wear

Indexed keywords

METAL; POLYMER;

ABRASION; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; DEVICE REMOVAL; ENDOPROSTHESIS; EXPLANT; FATIGUE; GIANT CELL; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK ATHROPLASTY; MACROPHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SCRATCHING; SKIN INJURY;

EID: 33744943248     PISSN: 10407383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semss.2006.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. David T. Revision of a Charite artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charite artificial disc. case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J 14 (2005) 507-511
2. Kurtz S.M., Peloza J., Siskey R., et al. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J 5 (2005) 344-350
3. Anderson P.A., Rouleau J.P., Toth J.M., et al. A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1 2 (2004) 202-210
4. Kurtz S.M., van Ooij A., Peloza J.P., et al. Central core and rim damage in retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement components (2005) 17 Proceedings of the NASS 20th Annual Meeting, September 28, 2005. Philadelphia, PA
5. Black J. Orthopaedic Biomaterials in Research and Practice (1988), Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY 314
6. Black J. Orthopaedic Biomaterials in Research and Practice (1988), Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY 320
7. Fielder J. Issues in ethics. IEEE Eng Med Biol 11 (1992) 75
8. McKellop H.A., Campbell P., Park S.H., et al. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaed Relat Res 311 (1995) 3-20
9. Wang A., Essner A., Polineni V.K., et al. Lubrication and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacements. Tribol Int 31 (1998) 17-33
10. Kurtz S.M., Rimnac C.M., Hozack W.J., et al. In vivo degradation of polyethylene liners after gamma sterilization in air. J Bone Joint Surg 87A (2005) 815-823
11. Buscher R., Tager G., Dudzinski W., et al. Subsurface microstructure of metal-on-metal hip joints and its relationship to wear particle generation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 72 (2005) 206-214
12. Kurtz S.M., McCombe P., Ciccarelli L., et al. In vivo wear mechanisms of a retrieved metal-on-metal total disc replacement. (2005) 12th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST), Banff, Alberta, Canada, July 7-9
13. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard F561-05. Standard Practice for Retrieval and Analysis of Medical Devices, and Associated Tissues and Fluids. Annual Book of ASTM Standards (2005), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 136-151
14. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard F981-04. Standard Practice for Assessment of Compatibility of Biomaterials for Surgical Implants with Respect to Effect of Materials on Muscle and Bone. Annual Book of ASTM Standards (2005), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 378-382
15. Schmalzried T.P., Jasty M., Rosenberg A., et al. Histologic identification of polyethylene wear debris using Oil Red O stain. J Appl Biomater 4 (1993) 119-125
16. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Metcalf N, et al: Reoperation Rates for Cervical Arthroplasty vs. Arthrodesis Read at the 32nd Annual Meeting Cervical Spine Research Society, San Diego, CA, December 1, 2005
17. Jensen W.K., Anderson P.A., Nel L., et al. Bone ingrowth in retrieved Bryan Cervical Disc prostheses. Spine 30 22 (2005) 2497-2502