Enamel-smear compromises bonding by mild self-etch adhesives

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 89, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1505-1509

  Mine, A ^a   De Munck, J ^a   Vivan Cardoso, M ^a   Van Landuyt, K L ^a   Poitevin, A ^a   Kuboki, T ^b   Yoshida, Y ^b   Suzuki, K ^b   Van Meerbeek, B ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

adhesion; enamel; hybrid layer; resin smear complex; smear layer; TEM; ultra mild self etch adhesive

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL S3 BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAMOND; HYDROXYAPATITE; INORGANIC COMPOUND; PROTECT LINER F; PUMICE; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; SILICON CARBIDE; SILICON DERIVATIVE; TOOTH CEMENT; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPERATURE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CARBON COMPOUNDS, INORGANIC; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED EQUIPMENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DIAMOND; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES; SILICON COMPOUNDS; SMEAR LAYER; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

EID: 78650080293     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034510384871     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amano S., Yamamoto A., Tsubota K., Rikuta A., Miyazaki M., Platt JA, et al. (2006). Effect of thermal cycling on enamel bond strength of single-step self-etch systems. Oper Dent 31: 616-622.
2. Ando S., Watanabe T., Tsubota K., Yoshida T., Irokawa A., Takamizawa T. (2008). Effect of adhesive application methods on bond strength to bovine enamel. J Oral Sci 50: 181-186.
3. Buonocore MG (1955). A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34: 849-853.
4. Buonocore MG, Matsui A., Gwinnett AJ (1968). Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 13: 61-70.
5. Cui FZ, Ge J. (2007). New observations of the hierarchical structure of human enamel, from nanoscale to microscale. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1: 185-191.
6. Eisenmman DR (1994). Enamel structure. In: Oral histology: development, structure and function. 4 th ed. Ten Cate AR, editor. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc., pp. 239-256.
7. Ermis RB, De Munck J., Cardoso MV, Coutinho E., Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A., et al. (2007). Bonding to ground versus unground enamel in fluorosed teeth. Dent Mater 23: 1250-1255.
8. Farina M., Schemmel A., Weissmüller G., Cruz R., Kachar B., Bisch PM (1999). Atomic force microscopy study of tooth surfaces. J Struct Biol 125: 39-49.
9. Ge J., Cui FZ, Wang XM, Feng HL (2005). Property variations in the prism and the organic sheath within enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 26: 3333-3339.
10. Hannig M., Bock H., Bott B., Hoth-Hannig W. (2002). Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 110: 464-470.
11. Kanemura N., Sano H., Tagami J. (1999). Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 27: 523-530.
12. Koshiro K., Sidhu SK, Inoue S., Ikeda T., Sano H. (2006). New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 77: 401-408.
13. Nakabayashi N., Pashley DH (1998). Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo, Japan: Quintessence Publishing Inc.
14. Nanci A. (2008). Enamel: composition, formation and structure. In: Ten Cate's oral histology: development, structure, and function. 7 th ed. Ten Cate AR, editor. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Inc. (Elsevier Health Science), pp. 141-190.
15. Nishiyama N., Tay FR, Fujita K., Pashley DH, Ikemura K., Hiraishi N., et al. (2006). Hydrolysis of functional monomers in a single-bottle self-etching primer-correlation of 13C NMR and TEM findings. J Dent Res 85: 422-426.
16. Pashley DH, Tay FR (2001). Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 17: 430-444.
17. Peumans M., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., Van Meerbeek B. (2007). Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 9: 7-10.
18. Salz U., Zimmermann J., Zeuner F., Moszner N. (2005). Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 7: 107-116.
19. Sarr M., Kane AW, Vreven J., Mine A., Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M., et al. (2009). Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent 35: 94-104.
20. Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Duke ES, Eick JD, et al. (1998). A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77: 50-59.
21. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Vijay P., et al. (2003). Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28: 215-235.
22. Watanabe T., Tsubota K., Takamizawa T., Kurokawa H., Rikuta A., Ando S., et al. (2008). Effect of prior acid etching on bonding durability of single-step adhesives. Oper Dent 33: 426-433.
23. Yoshida Y., Nagakane K., Fukuda R., Nakayama Y., Okazaki M., Shintani H., et al. (2004). Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83: 454-458.