A process study of computer-aided translation

Machine Translation

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 241-263

  Koehn, Philipp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer aided translation; Interactive translation; Statistical machine translation; Translation process study

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED TOOLS; INTERACTIVE TRANSLATION; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; STATISTICAL MACHINE TRANSLATION; TIME SPENT; TRANSLATION PROCESS;

LINGUISTICS;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 78650072433     PISSN: 09226567     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10590-010-9076-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albrecht J, Hwa R, Marai GE (2009) Correcting automatic translations through collaborations between MT and monolingual target-language users. In: EACL 2009, proceedings of the 12th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics, Athens, Greece, pp 60-68
2. Barrachina S, Bender O, Casacuberta F, Civera J, Cubel E, Khadivi S, Lagarda A, Ney H, Tomás J, Vidal E, Vilar J-M (2009) Statistical approaches to computer-assisted translation. Comput Linguist 35(1):3-28
3. Buchweitz A, Alves F (2006) Cognitive adaptation in translation. Letras de Hoje 41(2):241-272
4. Callison-Burch C, Koehn P, Monz C, Schroeder J (2009) Findings of the 2009 Workshop on statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the fourth workshop on statisticalmachine translation, Athens, Greece, pp 1-28
5. Carl M, Jakobsen AL, Jensen KTH (2008) Studying human translation behavior with user-activity data. In: Proceedings of the natural language processing and cognitive science conference, NLPCS 2008, Barcelona, Spain, pp 114-123
6. Foster G, Langlais P, Lapalme G (2002) User-friendly text prediction for translators. In: Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), Philadelphia, PA, pp 148-155
7. Fraser J (1996) The translator investigated: learning from translation process analysis. Translator 2(1): 65-79
8. Jääskeläinen R (2001) Think-aloud protocols. In: Baker M, Malmkjær K (eds) Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies. Routledge, London, pp 265-269 (new edition)
9. Jakobsen AL (2003) Effects of think aloud on translation speed, revision and segmentation. In: Alves F (ed) Triangulating translation: perspectives in process oriented research. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 69-95
10. Jakobsen AL, Schou L (1999) Translog documentation. In: Hansen G (ed) Probing the process of translation: methods and results, volume 24 of Copenhagen studies in language. Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen, pp 1-36
11. Jensen A, Jakobsen AL (2000) Translating under time pressure: an empirical investigation of problem-solving activity and translation strategies by non-professional and professional translators. In: Chesterman A, Salvador NGS, Gambier Y (eds) Translation in context. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 105-116
12. Koehn P (2009) A web-based interactive computer aided translation tool. In: Proceedings of the ACLIJCNLP 2009 software demonstrations, Suntec, Singapore, pp 17-20
13. Koehn P, Haddow B (2009) Edinburgh's submission to all tracks of the WMT 2009 shared task with reordering and speed improvements to Moses. In: Proceedings of the fourth workshop on statistical machine translation, Athens, Greece, pp 160-164
14. Koehn P, Hoang H, Birch A, Callison-Burch C, Federico M, Bertoldi N, Cowan B, Shen W, Moran C, Zens R, Dyer CJ, Bojar O, Constantin A, Herbst E (2007) Moses: open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics companion volume proceedings of the demo and poster sessions, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 177-180
15. Kumaran A, Saravanan K, Maurice S (2008) WikiBA-BEL: community creation of multilingual data. In: Babel wiki workshop 2008: cross-language collaboration, WikiSYM 2008 conference, Porto, Portugal. http://wiki- translation.com/tiki-download/-file.php?fileId=3
16. Langlais P, Foster G, Lapalme G (2000a) Transtype: a computer-aided translation typing system. In: Proceedings of the ANLP-NAACL 2000 workshop on embedded machine translation systems, Seattle, WA, pp 46-51
17. Langlais P, Sauvé S, Foster G, Macklovitch E, Lapalme G (2000b) Evaluation of TransType, a computeraided translation typing system: a comparison of theoretical- and user-oriented evaluation procedures. In: Second international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC), Athens, Greece, vol 2, pp 641-648
18. Levenshtein V (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov Phys Dokl 10:707-710
19. Lörscher W (2005) The translation process: method and problems of its investigation. Meta 50:597-608
20. O'Brien S (2005) Methodologies for measuring the correlations between post-editing effort and machine translatability. Mach Transl 19(1):37-58
21. Och FJ, Zens R, Ney H (2003) Efficient search for interactive statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of 10th conference of the meeting of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (EACL), Budapest, Hungary, pp 387-393
22. Raymond S (2007) Ajax on Rails: build dynamic web applications with Ruby. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA
23. Schilperoord J (1996) It's about time. Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Rodopi, Amsterdam
24. Sharmin S, Špakov O, Räihä K-J, Jakobsen AL (2008) Effects of time pressure and text complexity on translators' fixations. In: Proceedings of the eye tracking research and applications symposium (ETRA 2008), Savannah, GA, pp 67-70