Model for Heterogeneous Random Networks Using Continuous Latent Variables and an Application to a Tree-Fungus Network

Biometrics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1043-1051

  Daudin, Jean Jacques ^a   Pierre, Laurent ^b   Vacher, Corinne ^c  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^c UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

Author keywords

Ecological network; Grade of membership model; Heterogeneous random graph; Maximum likelihood; Mixture model

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS; GRADE OF MEMBERSHIP MODEL; HETEROGENEOUS RANDOM GRAPH; LATENT VARIABLE; MA XIMUM LIKELIHOODS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; MEMBERSHIP MODELS; MIXTURE MODELING; RANDOM GRAPHS; RANDOM NETWORK;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONNECTIVITY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FUNGUS; GRAPHICAL METHOD; HETEROGENEITY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL;

FUNGI;

EID: 78650061467     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01378.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Fienberg, S., and Xing, E. P. (2008). Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 1981-2014.
2. Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. (2000). Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 719-725.
3. Darwin, C. E. (1869). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 5th edition, p. 611. London John Murray.
4. Daudin, J. J., Picard, F., and Robin, S. (2008). A mixture model for random graphs. Statistics and Computing 18(2), 173-183.
5. Desprez-Loustau, M. L. (2009). The alien fungi of Europe. In Handbook of Alien Species in Europe, W. Nentwig, P. Hulme, P. Pysek, and M. Vila (eds), vol. 3, p. 400. Berlin Springer-Verlag.
6. Erosheva, E. (2005). Comparing latent structures of the grade of membership, Rasch and latent class model. Psychometrika 70(4), 619-628.
7. Erosheva, E., Fienberg, S., and Lafferty, J. (2004). Mixed-membership models of scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 5220-5227.
8. Garcia-Guzman, G. and Morales, E. (2007). Life-history strategies of plant pathogens: Distribution patterns and phylogenetic analysis. Ecology 88, 589-596.
9. Gassiat, E. (2002). Likelihood ratio inequalities with applications to various mixtures. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, 38, 897-906.
10. Handcock, M. S., Raftery, A. E., and Tantrum, J. M. (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 54, 301-354.
11. Harshman, R. A. (1978). Model for analysis of asymmetrical relationships among N objects or stimuli. First Joint Meeting of the Psychometric Society and the Society of Mathematical Psychology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
12. Hoff, D. (2005). Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, 286-295.
13. Hoff, D., Raftery, A. E., and Handcock, M. S. (2002). Latent space approach to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97, 1090-1098.
14. Kiers, H. A. L., Ten Berge, J. M. F., Takane, Y., and De Leeuw, J. (2002). A generalization of Takane's algorithm for DEDICOM. Psychometrika 55, 151-158.
15. Lewinsohn, T. M., Prado, P. I., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J., and Olesen, J. M. (2006). Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos 113, 174-184.
16. Manton, K. G., Woodbury, M. A., and Tolley, H. D. (1994). Statistical Applications Using Fuzzy Sets. New York Wiley Interscience.
17. Marchette, D. J. and Priebe, C. E. (2008). Predicting unobserved links in incompletely observed networks. CSDA 52, 1373-1386.
18. McLachlan, G. and Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. New York Wiley.
19. Mixnet (2009)., accessed November 21, 2009.
20. Nowicki, K. and Snijders, T. (2001). Estimation and prediction for stochastic block-structures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1077-1087.
21. Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., and Jordano, P. (2007). The modularity of pollination networks. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 19891-19896.
22. Parker, I. M. and Gilbert, G. S. (2004). The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35, 675-700.
23. Petit, R. J., Bialozyt, R., Garnier-Gere, P., and Hampe, A. (2004). Ecology and genetics of tree invasions: From recent introductions to quaternary migrations. Forest Ecology and Management 197, 117-137.
24. Picard, F., Miele, V., Daudin, J. J., Cottret, L., and Robin, S. (2009). Deciphering the connectivity structure of biological networks using MixNet. BMC Bioinformatics 10, accessed June 16, 2009.
25. Thompson, J. N. (2006). Mutualistic webs of species. Science 312, 372-373.
26. Trendafilov, N. T. (2002). GIPSCAL revisited. A projected gradient approach. Statistics and Computing 12, 135-145.
27. Vacher, C., Piou, D., and Desprez-Loustau, M.-L. (2008). Architecture of an antagonistic tree/fungus network: The asymmetric influence of past evolutionary history. PLoS ONE 3, e1740.
28. Vacher, C., Vile, D., Helion, E., Piou, D., and Desprez-Loustau, M. L. (2008). Distribution of parasitic fungal species richness: Influence of climate versus host species diversity. Diversity and Distributions 14, 786-798.
29. Young, S. J. and Scheinerman, E. R. (2007). Random dot product graph models for social networks. Conf WAW,