Geophysical characterization of riverbed hydrostratigraphy using electrical resistance tomography

Near Surface Geophysics

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 493-501

  Clifford, Jeremy ^a   Binley, Andrew ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; RIVER BED; SANDSTONE; TOMOGRAPHY;

CUMBRIA; EDEN VALLEY; ENGLAND; LEITH RIVER; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 78650044198     PISSN: 15694445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2010035     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alumbaugh D.L. and Newman G.A. 2000. Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion. Geophysics 65, 1455-1467.
2. Aster R.C., Borchers B. and Thurber C.H. 2005. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Academic Press.
3. Binley A. and Kemna A. 2005. DC resistivity and induced polarization methods. In: Hydrogeophysics (eds Y. Rubin and S.S. Hubbard), pp. 129-156. Springer.
4. Binley A., Ramirez A. and Daily W. 1995. Regularised image reconstruction of noisy electrical resistance tomography data. In: Process Tomography - Principles, Techniques and Applications (eds M.S. Beck and W. Williams), pp. 401-410. Butterworth-Heinemann.
5. Constable S.C., Parker R.L. and Constable C.G. 1987. Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52, 289-300.
6. Crook N., Binley A., Knight R., Robinson D.A., Zarnetske J. and Haggerty R. 2008. Electrical resistivity imaging of the architecture of substream sediments. Water Resources Research 44, W00D13. doi: 10.1029/2008WR006968
7. Dahlin T. and Zhou B. 2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with ten electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 379-398. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00423.x (Pubitemid 39169060)
8. Dahlin T. and Zhou B. 2006. Multiple-gradient array measurements for multichannel 2D resistivity imaging. Near Surface Geophysics 4, 113-123. (Pubitemid 43559566)
9. Edwards L. 1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP. Geophysics 42, 1020-1036. doi:10.1190/1.1440762
10. Jones J.B. and Mulholland P.J. 2000. Streams and Ground Waters. Academic Press.
11. Kearey P., Brooks M. and Hill I. 2002. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. Wiley-Blackwell.
12. Kwon H., Kim J., Ahn H., Yoon J., Kim K., Jung C., Lee S. and Uchida T. 2005. Delineation of a fault zone beneath a riverbed by an electrical resistivity survey using a floating streamer cable. Exploration Geophysics 36, 50-58. doi:10.1071/EG05050
13. Loke M. and Barker R. 1995. Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics 60, 1682-1690. (Pubitemid 26459546)
14. Menke W. 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Academic Press.
15. Nyquist J.E., Freyer P.A. and Toran L. 2008. Stream bottom resistivity tomography to map ground water discharge. Ground Water 46, 561-569. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00432.x
16. Oldenborger G.A. and Routh P.S. 2009. The point-spread function measure of resolution for the 3-D electrical resistivity experiment. Geophysical Journal International 176, 405-414.
17. Oldenburg D. and Li Y. 1999. Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics 64, 403-416. (Pubitemid 29388674)
18. Park S.K. and Van G.P. 1991. Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics 56, 951-960.
19. Ridd P. V. 1994. Electric potential due to a ring electrode. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 19, 464-467.
20. Roy A. and Apparao A. 1971. Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics 36, 943-959.
21. Selker J.S., Thévenaz L., Huwald H., Mallet A., Luxemburg W., Van De Giesen N., Stejskal M., Zeman J., Westhoff M. and Parlange M.B. 2006. Distributed fiber-optic temperature sensing for hydrologic systems. Water Resources Research 42, W12202. doi:10.1029/2006WR005326
22. Spitzer K. 1998. The three-dimensional DC sensitivity for surface and subsurface sources. Geophysical Journal International 134, 736-746. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00592.x (Pubitemid 29007069)
23. Szalai S. and Szarka L. 2008. On the classification of surface geoelectric arrays. Geophysical Prospecting 56,159-175. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-2478.2007.00673.x
24. Won I.J. 1987. The geometrical factor of a marine resistivity probe with four ring electrodes. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 12, 301-303.