Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 631-637

  Giffels, Joe ^a   Vollmer, Sara H ^b   Bird, Stephanie J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data; Data integrity; Data management; Ethics in science; Research compliance; Research integrity; Research oversight; Responsible conduct of research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; PATENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 78650041983     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9243-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albin, R. (2010). Patents, innovation, and privatization-commentary on: "Data management in academic settings: an Intellectual Property perspective." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9234-2.
2. Benos, D., & Vollmer, S. (2010). Generalizing on best practices in image processing: A model for promoting research integrity-commentary on: "Avoiding twisted pixels: Ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9226-2.
3. Bird, S. J. (2010). Responsible research: What is expected?-commentary on: "Statistical power, the Belmont Report, and the ethics of clinical trials." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9248-9.
4. Cromey, D. W. (2010). Avoiding twisted pixels: Ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9201-y.
5. Dahlberg, J. E., & Davidian, N. M. (2010). Scientific ethics: How the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9208-4.
6. Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2010). The essential nature of sharing in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9239-x.
7. Frugoli, J., Etgen, A. M., & Kuhar, M. (2010). Developing and communicating responsible data management policies to trainees and colleagues. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9219-1.
8. Geller, L. N. (2010). Data management in academic settings: An Intellectual Property perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9240-4.
9. Giffels, J. J. (2010). Sharing data is a shared responsibility-commentary on: "The essential nature of sharing in science." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9230-6.
10. Gunsalus, C. K. (2010). Best practices in communicating best practices-commentary on: "Developing and communicating responsible data management policies to trainees and colleagues." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9227-1.
11. Hamrell, M. R. (2010). Raising suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9232-4.
12. Joshi, M., & Krag, S. (2010). Issues in data management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9223-5.
13. Richardson, J., & Hoffman-Kim, D. (2010). The importance of defining 'data' in data management policies-commentary on: "Issues in data management." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9231-5.
14. Spitzig, P. (2010). Clinical study reflections: Another view-commentary on: "Raising suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: detecting misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9235-1.
15. Tilden, S. J. (2010). Incarceration, restitution, and lifetime debarment: Legal consequences of scientific misconduct in the Eric Poehlman case-commentary on: "Scientific forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review." Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9228-0.
16. US DHHS Office of Research Integrity (2010). http://www. ori. dhhs. gov. Accessed 6 Oct 2010.
17. Vollmer, S. H., & Howard, G. (2010). Statistical power, the Belmont Report, and the ethics of clinical trials. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, doi: 10. 1007/s11948-010-9244-0.