Generalizing on Best Practices in Image Processing: A Model for Promoting Research Integrity: Commentary on: Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 669-673

  Benos, Dale J ^a   Vollmer, Sara H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Best practices; Ethical thinking; Ethics in science; Image processing; Misconduct; RCR

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE;

CODES OF ETHICS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PHOTOGRAPHY; SCIENCE;

EID: 78650060517     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9226-2     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Cromey, D. (2010). Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi 10. 1007/s11948-010-9201-y.
2. Matchett, N. J. (2007). Frameworks. Center for Ethical Deliberation. http://mcb. unco. edu/ced/frameworks/. Accessed 20 July 2010.
3. Parrish, D., & Noonan, B. (2009). Image manipulation as research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(2), 161-167.
4. Pearson, H. (2006). Forensic software traces tweaks to images. Nature, 439, 520-521.
5. Vollmer, S. H., & Matchett, N. J. (2009). Incorporating Ethics Into RCR Courses. Newsletter. Office of Research Integrity, 18(1), 1. http://ori. dhhs. gov/documents/newsletters/vol18_no1. pdf. Accessed 20 July 2010.